@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:Olga is thanking Ecuador for their glorious defense of an Australian citizen's rights; not having a clue concerning how it may view and abuse the rights of Ecuadorian citizens.
How do you know what I know about Ecuador & its citizens, Finn?
If you'd like to start a thread about it I'd be happy to join you in a lengthier discussion there.
But this particular thread is about Wikileaks, Julian Assaange, Bradley Manning ... & that's the subject I intend to stick to here.
And yes, I am hugely relieved that
some state has intervened (in the absence of Julian Assange's own country) ... with some very sensible proposals:
What's wrong with the Swedish prosecution interviewing Julian Assange in the UK ?.... to resolve whether there is actually a case for charges to be laid against him or not.
For heavens sake, they've changed their minds enough times about it!
And the
nature of the actual allegations.
They cleared him to leave Sweden after their initial investigations, after he'd obliged them by staying on & answering their questions. How many times does be need to be interviewed about the same allegations?
And what's wrong with seeking an undertaking that he won't be extradited to the US from Sweden if he goes there? After all, this is about allegations (not charges yet) about sexual abuse, it is NOT about his Wikileaks activities .... Right?