Perception and physical reality

It's not only biology; it's also our environment.

Quote:

No, what I meant was that our environment also influences our physical reality.

for example of what you mean specfically , just so I get the jist of what your trying to say , then

Quote:

That the environment is required for life is a given.

good

If you are not aware of how our environment impacts our reality, I'm afraid you'll have to seek your answers elsewhere.

Since what's meaningless is inadmissible, I've thought of it as a fundamental demand. I haven't really thought past that.

Meaninglessness itself is a demand of meaning. For anything to be meaningful, it has to be compared to something else... it's negative or opposite. What partakes of meaninglessness? It's the far end of the pendulum swing where the negative is absent. Like if everything in the universe was green, the word green would have no meaning.

Communicate implies unity... commune. As with Plato's reminiscence. You can't teach somebody something they don't already know.

Meaning also implies structure. The will to speak leaves the one bound to the rules required to say something meaningful. I've imagined that the will to speak created the structure of language in the first place. But maybe the structure was a translation of something deeper. If there's ony one will, perhaps there's only one structure.

The problem with disunity is transcendence...could negative one be just a change in axis direction of one itself ? just imagine a negative causal chain coming from the future nullifying out potential actions when encountering positive one running in a slightly unbalanced out of sync way...something like an inverted "spin"...a kind of matter anti-matter encounter in a "mathematical realm"...

It reminds me of a myth about the birth of awareness. It goes that the fundamental substance of All is action. Action, by it's nature seeks to act upon something. It has nothing to act upon but itself, so it is action's effect on itself that creates primal awareness. Where the one meets itself, there appear to be two opposing. Secretly, it's only one.

It goes on: that something happens at this point of meeting... awareness includes the knowledge that what created it is going to destroy it, so a reaction develops which is primal identity.

I admire your attempts to speculate mathematically on the subject of "form".
However, given that physicists currently need about eleven "dimensions" to account for what they at present are calling "the physical world" I doubt whether "pictures" (sine waves etc) even in four dimensions, are going to have much significance.

This is why I am advocating that we look at our actual acts of communication as the focus, rather than their "semantic content". As one writer put it (I forget who), worshippers in a church are "united" by their mutually resonant activity rather than the disparate and unobservable contents of their minds

The OP of this thread suggests a description of reality where awareness and physical matter are values that cannot exist independently of eachother. There can be no awareness without physical world, and there can be no physical world without awareness. According to such a view, a myth of the birth of awareness is the same as a creation myth. A theory about the origin of awareness is the same as a theory of the origin of reality.
The simplest way to express it is perhaps that both awareness (presence without form) and physical matter (form without presence) are expressions of "quantum action".

Our environment influences our reality, because it's the basis of what kind of shelter and food are available (some must struggle to survive every day, while others do not have any worries), the culture in which we are born into (includes religion, beliefs, government control, racial mix, climate, and income of the family) the language(s) that we learn, the opportunities for wealth accumulation, and the exposure we have to other cultures.

These, I believe, only touch the surface of what we can consider environment.