JoanneDorel wrote:Wal-Mart is going down big time which means we will all pay more for everything. Finally the Courts step in under federal fair labor practices.
I don't understand your "finally". Could you please explain to me why you think Wal-Mart going down is a good thing?
JoanneDorel wrote:The only question now is how do we continue to subsidize China's economy?
I don't understand this one either. Could you please explain to me why you think WalMart is subsidizing the Chinese economy, and why you think this question matters?
JoanneDorel wrote:What if Wal-Mart has to pay a fair wage to their employees will they charge more money for the goods they sell or eat the extra cost?
Again, I don't get it. As I understand it, you aren't paying any Wal-Mart employees any wage at all. Wal-Mart is at least giving them a job. And even if the wage isn't fair in your judgment, this job makes them less poor than they would be without it. Yet you, who hasn't given them
any job and doesn't pay them
anything, appear to be claiming moral superiority over Wal-Mart, who does. Why? And while you're at it, could you please explain to me how you decide whether any given wage is fair or not? I'm asking because I suspect it means "a wage is fair if it's as high as I, Joanne Dorel, feel it ought to be" -- which would raise the question why you think your feelings have any more moral force than Wal-Mart's. But I could be wrong of course.