"History" according to atheists

Mini didn't know it. She said the description of the biblical account of creation didn't resemble reality.

It doesn't. You didn't describe creation you described how stars are used. Stars have to exist before they can be used for anything.

I described the creation that God created. All you have to do is read it. So there's no use lying about it because I can see the words right there in the bible. Sorry.

That's wise since evolution can't be verified historically or biologically.

I described the creation that God created. All you have to do is read it. So there's no use lying about it because I can see the words right there in the bible. Sorry.

Sure it can. I'll even present a challenge to you: Submit your DNA for a test. If you have 23 pairs of chromosomes, then evolutionary biology is verified. If you have 24, well... you have more problems than your misinterpretation of science.

Ever get a flu shot? Every time you do, you verify evolutionary biology as well as your own hypocrisy. I'm sure you've wondered why it's a yearly thing. By the way, where did H1N1 come from? Did a benevolent creator just *POOF* and make this virus, or was it a "hey, lemme finaggle with this and make this virus not only airborne, but communicable through humans!"? If so for either question... to what purpose? Creation and design infer purpose, so where's the purpose in H1N1?

Since you like giraffes, here's a neat one: What is the design and inferred purpose in the way a giraffe births its offspring? More specifically, what's the purpose in a young and innocent baby giraffe's first experience in this big world being a five foot introduction to gravity?

Better one: What's the purpose behind having more teeth than can fit in our jaw? Wisdom teeth suck, why are they there? Anyone who screwed up that badly wouldn't have a job in their field ever again. The same goes for our eyes... what's the purpose in connecting the optic nerve in such a fashion that it causes a MASSIVE blind spot. If we were created, how could such a being screw the pooch that badly?

1) Which traits "mutated" from the "common ancestors" and which did not
2) How they mutated
3) How long it took for them to mutate
4) What traits the descendants had since he didn't know what traits the common ancestors had!

These questions demonstrate you have no idea what a mutation even is.

1) traits do not mutate, only genetic material can mutate.
2) Error in gene replication
3) Mutation occurs when offspring is formed, you're born with your mutations
4) you are the descendant, what traits do you have?

And you don't know:

1) That copulation has to happen between two animals or humans in order for any gene to mutate into a different trait (which is impossible to begin with). And since apes and humans cannot interbreed, then one cannot pass any of their genes onto the other. That's Biology 101. :rolleyes:

2) Genes cannot become the genes of another animal or human genes could turn into giraffe genes.

But that's okay, I know you can't think for yourself

That's not how evolution works you fool!

Evolution does not require interbreeding. At the very least you should understand the fundamentals of what you are attempting (and failing horrifically) to refute.

I don't think it's too much to ask that you understand how evolution works when trying to "debunk" it.







And where is it said ANYWHERE that humans turn into giraffes?

NOWHERE! Stop using this example it does not represent evolution. In fact if we found that giraffes became humans this would REFUTE evolution not support it. You know this is not what evolution implies, it's been explained multiple times, and yet you purposely misrepresent it. This is called dishonesty.









This is ironic.

Coming from a person of faith.

Evolution does not require interbreeding. At the very least you should understand the fundamentals of what you are attempting (and failing horrifically) to refute.

:rollinglaugh: Saying "mutations exist means that the story of evolution is true' is no different than saying that since little people exist, namely dwarfs and midgets, then that makes "Lord of the Rings" true. :rollinglaugh:

The story of evolution is no different than the hypothesis; "If dogs once ruled the world, then humans came from dogs." Then the rest of the story is how could dogs turn into humans? Well, their genes just mutated into human genes. :rollinglaugh:

But the problem with the story of evolution is, Darwin forgot about the word "If" and "What if" became "It happened!":rollinglaugh:

Sorry, but a conclusion can only be as hypothetical as the premise is. And since Darwin didn't describe his main characters, then he couldn't possibly know what traits they had in the first place! He thus can't know:

1) Which traits "mutated" from the "common ancestors" and which did not

2) How they mutated

3) How long it took for them to mutate

4) What traits the descendants had since he didn't know what traits the common ancestors had!

So again, if an author doesn't know his main characters, then he has no story since he can't talk about non-existent characters. And that is of course, why, no one today who believes the badly written story of evolution knows the origin of man. .

This is by far the funniest post yet!:rollinglaugh::rollinglaugh: So humans aren't the product of mating and breeding between our ancestors. Is that correct? :eek::rollinglaugh: So please tell me how you came to be. Let's see, how about:

1) Your parents wished your existence
2) Your ancestors put up a hand to the sky and children came. :rollinglaugh:
3) I know, your genes were floating around in space, formed you and bingo, you were born! :rollinglaugh:
4) By your reasoning, the genes of an ape can simply turn into the genes of a human like a quick or slow change artist. :rollinglaugh:

All you've proven is that evolutionists don't know how offspring are produced. So thank you for proving that. I'm glad i initiated a thread on the birds and the bees. Oh, I know that even children know how offspring are produced, but I always knew that evolutionists didn't. :rollinglaugh:

This is by far the funniest post yet!:rollinglaugh::rollinglaugh: So humans aren't the product of mating and breeding between our ancestors. Is that correct? :eek::rollinglaugh: So please tell me how you came to be. Let's see, how about:

1) Your parents wished your existence
2) Your ancestors put up a hand to the sky and children came. :rollinglaugh:
3) I know, your genes were floating around in space, formed you and bingo, you were born! :rollinglaugh:
4) By your reasoning, the genes of an ape can simply turn into the genes of a human like a quick or slow change artist. :rollinglaugh:

All you've proven is that evolutionists don't know how offspring are produced. So thank you for proving that. I'm glad i initiated a thread on the birds and the bees. Oh, I know that even children know how offspring are produced, but I always knew that evolutionists didn't. :rollinglaugh:

{Mini} said the description of the biblical account of creation didn't resemble reality. )

If not, why didn't God make the Boston Terrier? Its origins are younger than this country. We observed this new breed coming into being.

Since many people here claim that mating and breeding has nothing to do with evolution

Since many people here claim that mating and breeding has nothing to do with evolution,