The Anti-Christ movement

:rollinglaugh: You just argued that the bible is a pile of **** and you don't even know it ! :rollinglaugh:

They didn't come from imaginary beings. You're correct in saying my evidence doesn't state that. The evidence all points to Mankind evolving from real organisms

"Evolution is a fact." - Video voice


"Theory means fact[paraphrased]" - Video voice

"Evolution is both a theory AND a fact" - Video voice

"So no, the theory of evolution cannot be proven 100%". - Video voice.

If it cannot be proven - it is NOT a FACT. It is a belief.

New species might appear from time to time, but that does not mean they have evolved from something lesser into something greater. A mutation, (one of the things Video voice uses as an example of evolution), is not necessarily the result of evolving from one creature into another. There has been no IRREFUTABLE scientific EVIDENCE OF ONE CREATURE EVOLVING INTO ANOTHER IN THE HISTORY OF THE STUDY OF EVOLUTION. To say that a creature or plant changed or morphed does not mean it has evolved. There are some creatures, such as the caterpillar, which morph into butterflies. This is not an evolution, it is a genetic predisposition.

One thing in favor of the "Creationist" is: If we are wrong, we have nothing to lose. But if we are right, evolutionist have nothing to gain, but everything to lose.

Happy trails.

If the common ancestors aren't figments of the imaginations of men, then who are they? Describe them, name them and tell us how many there were.

New species might appear from time to time, but that does not mean they have evolved from something lesser into something greater.

There has been no IRREFUTABLE scientific EVIDENCE OF ONE CREATURE EVOLVING INTO ANOTHER IN THE HISTORY OF THE STUDY OF EVOLUTION.

One thing in favor of the "Creationist" is: If we are wrong, we have nothing to lose. But if we are right, evolutionist have nothing to gain, but everything to lose.

Amen. Since nothing superior can come from something inferior, then evolution is not only a lie,

Menstruation disproves God.

An intelligent and loving god would not have come up with a design that requires menstruation, but would have found a better solution...

Dogma is blindly believing everything scientists say even though it contradicts reality. Sorry.

Had you read/comprehended what I wrote you would have quickly noted that I was referring to Darwins THEORY, (with THEORY being typed in bold face). I would not think there a need to reiterate the word THEORY everytime I wrote of evolution in that post.

OOPS....You forgot to mention that Standard Model is a THEORY. THEORYS are not considered facts. At best they are fanciful thought. Not a proven science; not considered a possibility or probability because there are few to no links to connect them to reality. REALITY is not connected to THEORY!

Theory = Fact
Hypotheses = Idea or Guess

:thumbup:

Not quite.

Theory = Tested hypothesis


both theories and hypothesizes are concepts that interpret and explain observed facts.

Contrary to popular belief, a scientific law is NOT a proven theory, this belief is incorrect. A law is a theory that is expressed mathematically. For example, gravity is both a theory and a law.

Law of gravity: F = G(m1m2)/r2

Gravity (as theory): The natural force of attraction between any two massive bodies, which is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

You're close.

A law is an observable occurrence.

The Law of Thermodynamics, the Law of Gravity, the Law of Relativity, ect.

Theories on the other hand describe the factual mechanisms as to how they work.

For example the Law of Evolution states that all life adapts or dies

The Theory of Evolution describes how it adapts.

Most people mistakenly use theory and hypotheses interchangeably, the result being people like Carico thinking that evolution hasn't been proven because 'it's just a theory' when being 'just a theory' actually means it's been proven.