Why have people come to percieve god as good?

you're being wetodded.. i stated before that i know both sides of this argument.. and as fervently as i can argue against christianity.. i have enough knowlege of your bible that i can equally argue for it.. i stated that i was once christian.. was baptized.. and this is what happened at my baptism.. i never claimed to be perfect. but i'll take into consideration that i very well may be a god.:rollinglaugh:

Sorry, but once you meet someone, you can never deny he exists. So you've obviously never been born again of the Holy Spirit or you could never deny Christ. So all you did was pay lip service to Jesus, never understanding a word he said. :rolleyes: If you had understood him, you'd understand him now. Sorry.

Wow, you met him,...flesh and blood and everything? Post the pics bro.

Sorry, but once you meet someone, you can never deny he exists. So you've obviously never been born again of the Holy Spirit or you could never deny Christ. So all you did was pay lip service to Jesus, never understanding a word he said. :rolleyes: If you had understood him, you'd understand him now. Sorry.

Your post proves you never knew the Holy Spirit better than I could ever prove it to you. So thank you.

:eek:not only going to hell numpty.. but DESTROYED!!!!:no:!!!!!.. i am aware of something they call generational sin.. where the affects of sin.. are carried down to our children.. their children.. their children's children... i was baptized when i was younger.. and i distinctly remember them praying over me to break the bonds of the generations of sin that apparently i was suffering from.:rollinglaugh:

in case you didnt read my other post.. concerning my awakening.. i once would have called my self a child of god.. but i am no longer suffering from that delusion..

Sorry, but once you meet someone, you can never deny he exists. So you've obviously never been born again of the Holy Spirit or you could never deny Christ.

Hehe. What!?!?!? Lost me mate. why would you need to prove it to me? Surely if the holy spirit has been seen flesh and blood then there are pics?

If not then your meeting took place in your head, there's a medical term for that you know.

The unseen is far more vast than the seen. But those who only understand the narrow world of what is seen, can't see past finite objects. So I won't explain the unseen to you since you can't understand it.

Because you can't. Because your 'moment' with God/Jesus/Holy Spirit, was personal to you right?

Schizophrenia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nope. It happens to all born again Christians of which there are millions. What's delusional is making up your own imaginary story of what happened in Jerusalem during the time of Christ other than what eye-witness recount.

The unseen is far more vast than the seen.

Sweet, eyewitness accounts in Jerusalem, Lets see 'em.

Remember how this works.

You say 'It's all in the Bible Numpty'

'Ahh so it is Carico. But that is just one piece of evidence'

'Well it has lots of books contained within, they are all independant'

'True, but they were all put together 300 years after the event, do have some more substantial eyewitness accounts? There should be at least one, he was the son of God?'

Now you go away and make good on your claim.

You know where to find the eye-witness accounts...in the bible. But like all atheists as I described in my thread; "Atheist debating tactics"will simply call authors liars with no proof for their claims. Sorry, that's not based on knowledge but ignorance and hatred. So it's called slander. And slander is not a valid argument. So try again.

One piece of evidence does not constitute proof. It needs to be backed up with a hole host of other evidence.

This buddy is how science works.

So in other words, you adopt beliefs for which you have zero proof like claiming that the eye-witnesses of Christ's life were liars, and reject beliefs from people who do have eye-witness accounts. Is that correct? :rollinglaugh: If so, then you prove my thread on atheist debating tactics to be true. No wonder you make up stories about the past which can't be verified by anyone in history. :rollinglaugh::rollinglaugh: You're so funny. :rollinglaugh:

You know where to find the eye-witness accounts...in the bible.

But like all atheists as I described in my thread; "Atheist debating tactics"will simply call authors liars with no proof for their claims.

FAIL!!

Can you just point me to the post where I call anyone a liar?

I say, and read this bit slowly.

The Bible is [SIZE="7"]ONE[/SIZE]piece of evidence which supports the existance of Jesus. Now seeing as he is supposed to be the single biggest event the world has ever seen, do you not think it odd there is no other evidence to support his existsnce.

It's not about calling people liars (again show me where I have said this) It's about producing evidence.

You sit there proding the keys, say evolution is made up, yet there is thousands and thousands of documented evidence supporting it, you have [SIZE="7"]ONE[/SIZE] book.

Not difficult to see where reality is.

If so, then I trust from now on you won't try to look for evidence that the bible is wrong.

each book contains only one account, that of the author. The bible mentions such eye-witness accounts yet none can be found. This is not surprising since most people at the time were illiterate.