1
   

Holes in the Plot: The Flood of Genesis

 
 
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Nov, 2007 06:06 pm
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;44575 wrote:
*I* am willing to consider ANYTHING (except the Scientologists). I'll say right now that yes, perhaps there is a big guy out there playing a game of Sims that is our universe. Could very well be possible.

However, given things at face value, science wins. They've been right with quite a bit, ya know. They've been right with a lot of things that you guys particularly didn't like. The whole "Earth is not at the center of the Universe" was a big one back in it's time. I think people died over that, not entirely sure.

They were right with physics. They've been right with relativity. Electronics they hit spot on. Modern medicine, things we take for granted all day (the Internet), all due to advances in science. So yes, I side with the labcoats.

But now... now that science is taking apart the human body... us, you get all upset. Why? Why are you against science NOW. You've got no problem with anything science has given us or says... except this.

You're afraid they may be right.

Now, science has been wrong. Even Albert Einstein was wrong once or twice. Science admits it's wrong and moves on. But you have to PROVE science is wrong on it's home turf. If you can do that, we will concede your argument.


I don't have a problem with real science, yet the Bible tells us beware of science falsly so called. And this is were Evolution comes into the picture. As far as the Bible goes, there are a number of things spoken of in the Bible that agrees with science, and infact there are things stated before science knew about them. The Bible is not a science Book, yet its truth should guide us to agree with real science. We Christians believe that dinosaurs lived just thousands of years ago, not millions. Now Evolution has stated that dinosaurs died out 70 million years ago. Well then we have the new soft tissue problem. It was not the Christians who had to change their belief, it was the believers in Evolution who were forced to change their theory again. They use to say soft tissue would never be found in dinosaur bones because soft tissue only could last 10,000 years. Now they tell us it can last 70 million years. (What a joke.) There is getting to be so many things that fly in the face of Evolution today, that believers in it almost need to take an obstacle course. Take the discovery at El Toro Mountain in Mexico. In 1944 Waldemar Julsrud who was also the co-discoverer of the Chupicauro culture site. Was ridding his horse when he spotted a partially exposed hewn stone and ceramic objects half buried in the dirt. As it turned out, and after much time thousands of ceramic objects were discovered. This would of been one of the great discoveries of the 20th century. However the problem was, many of these ancient ceramic objects were of dinosaurs. And some of them were of dinosaurs that science had not yet discovered. So science did what it does best when their theory is at risk. They ignored the discovery. Now this is not an isolated event, there is other evidence that refutes the thinking of todays science. Yet this evidence just like what was found at El Toro Mountain is ignored as well. I will post the link below, hope it works for you.

benner wc homes for sale at bennerwc.com
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Nov, 2007 06:11 pm
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;44807 wrote:
I don't have a problem with real science, yet the Bible tells us beware of science falsly so called. And this is were Evolution comes into the picture. As far as the Bible goes, there are a number of things spoken of in the Bible that agrees with science, and infact there are things stated before science knew about them. The Bible is not a science Book, yet its truth should guide us to agree with real science. We Christians believe that dinosaurs lived just thousands of years ago, not millions. Now Evolution has stated that dinosaurs died out 70 million years ago. Well then we have the new soft tissue problem. It was not the Christians who had to change their belief, it was the believers in Evolution who were forced to change their theory again. They use to say soft tissue would never be found in dinosaur bones because soft tissue only could last 10,000 years. Now they tell us it can last 70 million years. (What a joke.) There is getting to be so many things that fly in the face of Evolution today, that believers in it almost need to take an obstacle course. Take the discovery at El Toro Mountain in Mexico. In 1944 Waldemar Julsrud who was also the co-discoverer of the Chupicauro culture site. Was ridding his horse when he spotted a partially exposed hewn stone and ceramic objects half buried in the dirt. As it turned out, and after much time thousands of ceramic objects were discovered. This would of been one of the great discoveries of the 20th century. However the problem was, many of these ancient ceramic objects were of dinosaurs. And some of them were of dinosaurs that science had not yet discovered. So science did what it does best when their theory is at risk. They ignored the discovery. Now this is not an isolated event, there is other evidence that refutes the thinking of todays science. Yet this evidence just like what was found at El Toro Mountain is ignored as well. I will post the link below, hope it works for you.

benner wc homes for sale at bennerwc.com


Well I had it right but looks like were selling homes. lol
You might just type in, THE DINOSAURS OF ACAMBARO.
The article in question was authored by Dr. Dennis Swift Ph.D.
0 Replies
 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Nov, 2007 07:34 pm
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;44807 wrote:
I don't have a problem with real science, yet the Bible tells us beware of science falsly so called. And this is were Evolution comes into the picture. As far as the Bible goes, there are a number of things spoken of in the Bible that agrees with science, and infact there are things stated before science knew about them. The Bible is not a science Book, yet its truth should guide us to agree with real science. We Christians believe that dinosaurs lived just thousands of years ago, not millions. Now Evolution has stated that dinosaurs died out 70 million years ago. Well then we have the new soft tissue problem. It was not the Christians who had to change their belief, it was the believers in Evolution who were forced to change their theory again. They use to say soft tissue would never be found in dinosaur bones because soft tissue only could last 10,000 years. Now they tell us it can last 70 million years. (What a joke.) There is getting to be so many things that fly in the face of Evolution today, that believers in it almost need to take an obstacle course. Take the discovery at El Toro Mountain in Mexico. In 1944 Waldemar Julsrud who was also the co-discoverer of the Chupicauro culture site. Was ridding his horse when he spotted a partially exposed hewn stone and ceramic objects half buried in the dirt. As it turned out, and after much time thousands of ceramic objects were discovered. This would of been one of the great discoveries of the 20th century. However the problem was, many of these ancient ceramic objects were of dinosaurs. And some of them were of dinosaurs that science had not yet discovered. So science did what it does best when their theory is at risk. They ignored the discovery. Now this is not an isolated event, there is other evidence that refutes the thinking of todays science. Yet this evidence just like what was found at El Toro Mountain is ignored as well. I will post the link below, hope it works for you.

benner wc homes for sale at bennerwc.com


So you pick and choose what is 'real science' and what isn't?
Adam Bing
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Nov, 2007 10:01 pm
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;44807 wrote:
I don't have a problem with real science, yet the Bible tells us beware of science falsly so called. And this is were Evolution comes into the picture. As far as the Bible goes, there are a number of things spoken of in the Bible that agrees with science, and infact there are things stated before science knew about them. The Bible is not a science Book, yet its truth should guide us to agree with real science. We Christians believe that dinosaurs lived just thousands of years ago, not millions. Now Evolution has stated that dinosaurs died out 70 million years ago. Well then we have the new soft tissue problem. It was not the Christians who had to change their belief, it was the believers in Evolution who were forced to change their theory again. They use to say soft tissue would never be found in dinosaur bones because soft tissue only could last 10,000 years. Now they tell us it can last 70 million years. (What a joke.) There is getting to be so many things that fly in the face of Evolution today, that believers in it almost need to take an obstacle course. Take the discovery at El Toro Mountain in Mexico. In 1944 Waldemar Julsrud who was also the co-discoverer of the Chupicauro culture site. Was ridding his horse when he spotted a partially exposed hewn stone and ceramic objects half buried in the dirt. As it turned out, and after much time thousands of ceramic objects were discovered. This would of been one of the great discoveries of the 20th century. However the problem was, many of these ancient ceramic objects were of dinosaurs. And some of them were of dinosaurs that science had not yet discovered. So science did what it does best when their theory is at risk. They ignored the discovery. Now this is not an isolated event, there is other evidence that refutes the thinking of todays science. Yet this evidence just like what was found at El Toro Mountain is ignored as well. I will post the link below, hope it works for you.

benner wc homes for sale at bennerwc.com


Question 1: When exactly did you Christians start believeing that dinosaurs lived just a thousad years ago? Until a few years ago, the fundamentalist christian belief was that DINASAURS DID NOT EXIST and that the fossils were put there by god to test our faith. When the evidence could no longer be denied, then we had this paradigm shift from the side of the fundamenalist christians to factor for all those kids who are totally fascinated by dinosaurs. Your bunch Sir, are little more than con artists.
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Nov, 2007 11:06 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;44831 wrote:
So you pick and choose what is 'real science' and what isn't?


When it comes to Evolution I do pick and choose, because I am finding far more evidence that supports the Biblical account, than the Theory of Evolution.
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Nov, 2007 11:12 pm
@Adam Bing,
Adam Bing;44867 wrote:
Question 1: When exactly did you Christians start believeing that dinosaurs lived just a thousad years ago? Until a few years ago, the fundamentalist christian belief was that DINASAURS DID NOT EXIST and that the fossils were put there by god to test our faith. When the evidence could no longer be denied, then we had this paradigm shift from the side of the fundamenalist christians to factor for all those kids who are totally fascinated by dinosaurs. Your bunch Sir, are little more than con artists.


First of all I doubt that you spoke with every Christian from that time period. Even today Christians do not agree on everything. So to pick those who did not agree with those first findings from back then, and then brand all of the Christian faith is really a stretch.
0 Replies
 
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Nov, 2007 11:55 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;44600 wrote:
also not a valid source, this site talks of conjecture, the only evidence i saw at all was of the chariot axle in the water without any sources cited at all....

the chariot axle doesn't really prove that chariots crossed the red sea....infact it is entirely possible that a ship containing chariots or chariot parts may have crashed dumping the axle into the water!

if this is the best evidence you can provide then consider this argument over!


Conjecture?
Half of Evolution is conjecture, oh but that's ok, because that's scientific conjecture.
If a ship had crashed, then they should of found the remains of such a ship.
Also the site was marked by two 18 foot granit pillars which were placed there by King Solomon. The Bible speaks of these pillars in Isaiah 19:19. And there is extra Biblical writings at the site carved in stone which mirrors the Biblical account.
Also, not far from this site they discovered the real Mt. Sinai and the split rock at Horeb. Also they have found the altar where they believe the golden calf rested on. Also, on one of the granit pillar are found the inscriptions, Egypt, death, water, pharaoh, Edom, Yahweh, and Solomon. All the evidence is there and much more, but don't expect to see the believers in Evolution rushing in to prove the Bible correct.

The only one's intrested in this evidence are Christians, so yes, the arguement is most likely over. The Bible tells us the time will come when men would rather believe a lie than the truth. And when you have such evidence like this simply being ignored, then yes, the Bible is proven correct again.

The Hebrew Red Sea Crossing (Exodus)
Mt. Sinai - The Real Mt. Sinai Rediscovered in Arabia
0 Replies
 
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Nov, 2007 02:06 am
@mako cv,


God did not work with in the physical laws when he raised Christ from the dead after three days. I don't know of any normal physical laws that could be called on to regenerate a body after three days. And this example is not just my personal opinion.

The pharaoh did not drown, his army did. And there is extra Biblical writings written in stone around where they are finding the coral incrusted army. In the Sinai they have found Sinaitic Inscriptions that read. "The wind blowing, the sea dividing into parts, they pass over" "The Hebrews flee through the sea; the sea is turned into dry land." "The waters permitted and dismissed to flow, burst rushing unawares upon the astonished men, congregated from quarters banded together to slay treacherously being lifted up with pride."
ect.

Not long ago, I saw a program by two researchers who found in Egypt a record of the plagues that came on egypt which matched the Biblical account, and there was carved in stone a picture of Egyptian chariots being covered with water. I would have to do a little more research to locate the source, but I recall the program, and I though it was very good. I did not agree with all that was stated, yet I did see the record of events that was recorded.
Adam Bing
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Nov, 2007 03:55 am
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;45017 wrote:
God did not work with in the physical laws when he raised Christ from the dead after three days. I don't know of any normal physical laws that could be called on to regenerate a body after three days. And this example is not just my personal opinion.

The pharaoh did not drown, his army did. And there is extra Biblical writings written in stone around where they are finding the coral incrusted army. In the Sinai they have found Sinaitic Inscriptions that read. "The wind blowing, the sea dividing into parts, they pass over" "The Hebrews flee through the sea; the sea is turned into dry land." "The waters permitted and dismissed to flow, burst rushing unawares upon the astonished men, congregated from quarters banded together to slay treacherously being lifted up with pride."
ect.

Not long ago, I saw a program by two researchers who found in Egypt a record of the plagues that came on egypt which matched the Biblical account, and there was carved in stone a picture of Egyptian chariots being covered with water. I would have to do a little more research to locate the source, but I recall the program, and I though it was very good. I did not agree with all that was stated, yet I did see the record of events that was recorded.


More than half your live over Mr.Campbell and this is all that you've learnt....
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Nov, 2007 05:41 am
@Adam Bing,
Adam Bing;45023 wrote:
More than half your live over Mr.Campbell and this is all that you've learnt....


Well half of my life may be over, but I believe if you had the knowledge you would of been able to write more than one sentence in responce to my post.
If what I have posted was untrue, could you not of pointed that out. And if what I posted was true, asking me it that was all I learned in my life time really would of been a mute point. If that evidence given is verfied, then that means that many details the Bible describes would be true. At least on the story of the crossing of the Red Sea. And that is a story that non believers said never happened. Yet from evidence being gathered, it appears the events really did occure.
Adam Bing
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 01:33 am
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;45027 wrote:
Well half of my life may be over, but I believe if you had the knowledge you would of been able to write more than one sentence in responce to my post.
If what I have posted was untrue, could you not of pointed that out. And if what I posted was true, asking me it that was all I learned in my life time really would of been a mute point. If that evidence given is verfied, then that means that many details the Bible describes would be true. At least on the story of the crossing of the Red Sea. And that is a story that non believers said never happened. Yet from evidence being gathered, it appears the events really did occure.


The bible may well have use as a historical document. It could very well refer to events that occured as does hstorical literature from all over the world. I will not dispute that point.

However, there is bound to be variance between the biblical story based around a histrical event and the event itself. That is natural.
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Nov, 2007 01:20 am
@Adam Bing,
Adam Bing;45110 wrote:
The bible may well have use as a historical document. It could very well refer to events that occured as does hstorical literature from all over the world. I will not dispute that point.

However, there is bound to be variance between the biblical story based around a histrical event and the event itself. That is natural.


There are variances between some Biblical stories because those who wrote such stories often did so from their personal experience. Now those seperate experiences donot imply that the historical record is inaccurate. They are just experiences from their perspective. Yet, when the prophecies are spoken of, these are not given from mans point of view, but Gods. Now back in the 1800s one Christian author stated that Christ's return must still be far ahead in the future because the Jews have not yet returned to the land of Israel, and Jerusalem has not yet been surrounded by the armies of the nations. And this author asked the question, who will bring these events to pass? Well the author did not know about Hitlers Europe, or the death camps. Yet He did know that something would have to motivate the Jews to return in large numbers to the land of Israel, and he also knew they would control Jerusalem. The Bible stated these events would happen in the latter years, and that author believed that. When you consider all the prophecies of the Bible, you often see that unforseen events bringing about their fulfillment. If the prophecies were just the invention of ancient man, then their folly should of been exposed by now. Yet, because these prophecies keep happening as the Bible describes, then you have to understand that there is something more at work here, than simple random chance.
0 Replies
 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Nov, 2007 03:11 pm
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;45006 wrote:
When it comes to Evolution I do pick and choose, because I am finding far more evidence that supports the Biblical account, than the Theory of Evolution.


really!? you must not be looking very hard, there are vast amounts of evidence, how exactly do you explain the huge amounts of fossil evidence? It seems like you are rather ignoring evolution, you cannot find any proof agaisnt evolution yet there is much much much evidence for it, evolution is almost unanimously accpeted in the scientific realm!
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 01:14 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;45289 wrote:
really!? you must not be looking very hard, there are vast amounts of evidence, how exactly do you explain the huge amounts of fossil evidence? It seems like you are rather ignoring evolution, you cannot find any proof agaisnt evolution yet there is much much much evidence for it, evolution is almost unanimously accpeted in the scientific realm!


There are no transitionals in the fossil record, if there were, you could show us a picture of one. And right now, there should be so many of them that a clear transitional would be obvious to everyone. We have lots of fossils, we just don't have any showing Evolution. Can you show us a fossil showing us legs and fins together, I mean, there should be millions of them, that's what Darwin said.
0 Replies
 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 06:41 pm
@Campbell34,
Campbell34;45006 wrote:
When it comes to Evolution I do pick and choose, because I am finding far more evidence that supports the Biblical account, than the Theory of Evolution.


So you get to pick and choose what is real science, and the experts in the field, scientists, don't know what the hell they are talking about?

face the facts, You don't know more about science than scientists do!
klyph
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 07:34 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;47258 wrote:
So you get to pick and choose what is real science, and the experts in the field, scientists, don't know what the hell they are talking about?

face the facts, You don't know more about science than scientists do!


That's really foolish to believe something that a human with unknown motivations tells you just because they went to school for a long time. "Being a scientist" doesn't mean squat.
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 07:59 pm
@Silverchild79,
Following that logic researchers of the bible like The Pope does not mean squat right? I mean here is a guy who has devoted his entire life to one thing, and he does infact have his motives as well. So priests and other men of the cloth do not mean squat either. Right?
0 Replies
 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 08:04 pm
@klyph,
klyph;47264 wrote:
That's really foolish to believe something that a human with unknown motivations tells you just because they went to school for a long time. "Being a scientist" doesn't mean squat.


I am not saying scientists know everything nor am i saying they are infallible, but i will admit that they know more of the subject than I do, and i trust them for that reason. If you are unwilling to trust the experts who know more about a subject than you then perhaps you shouldn't believe in the existance of "dark matter" after all, being a scientist doesn't mean squat.
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 10:20 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;47258 wrote:
So you get to pick and choose what is real science, and the experts in the field, scientists, don't know what the hell they are talking about?

face the facts, You don't know more about science than scientists do!


Well I know more because I have a Book that speaks the truth. Science is blind to that Book, and that gives me an advantage that science does not have. It's like I'm diving with a face mask, and science has to dive without one. Who will have a better description of the bottom? Science has time after time shown us they don't know what there talking about. That's why we have to keep rejecting their past evidence.
Campbell34
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 11:46 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;47270 wrote:
I am not saying scientists know everything nor am i saying they are infallible, but i will admit that they know more of the subject than I do, and i trust them for that reason. If you are unwilling to trust the experts who know more about a subject than you then perhaps you shouldn't believe in the existance of "dark matter" after all, being a scientist doesn't mean squat.


Well if you had trusted them 30 years ago, most of what they told us back then was proven to be wrong. And most of what they are telling us now days
will turn out to be wrong, because it is based on their imagination, and not real science. Thats why we have to look at artistic pictures of transitionals, because no real ones exist. Science knows a lot when they use real science to get there. Yet when science is reduced to guess work by the men in white coats mixed with artistic drawings. Well, thats when good science goes out the window.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 11:38:25