@Campbell34,
Campbell34;44266 wrote:Even Inca ruins have been found to contain metal braces, and they were braces to support Inca stone walls. The fact is there were many things that existed back then that few consider even today.
If you take the Noah's Ark story as literal fact you are a fool!
There are too many problems with the ark story namely:
1. one man and his sons cannot build a boat of that size in time
2. The boat would have to support it's own weight
3. despite size it would still have to float
4. the animals couldn't have all come to noah (some can't swim)
5. Noah would have to know of all unknown animals
6. The boat wouldn't be big enough to hold all of earths animals
7. Noah would have to determine gender of all animals
8. the animals would need enough food to survive the flood
9. geology doesn't support idea of global flood
10. Aniamls couldn't eat eachother durring the trip
11. none of the animals could die durring the flood
12. the animals couldn't dammage the ark (termites, woodpeckers etc.)
13. The two animals of each species would have to be interested in each other
14. How did Noah repopulate?
15. How did boat dock after flood?
16. Animals couldn't have eaten Noah
17. Noah would have returned all animals to prospective habitats
18. There wouldn't be the variety of animals if story is true
19. Ark wouldn't been able to shelter all aniamls
20. How did noah give the animals water?
etc...