@plainoldme,
Quote: This is not creative writing but essay writing. We concentrated on definition, narration, compare and contrast, and, the most important, argument.
The writing resources courses for science grads at U of Delaware and Princeton have a required writing course for incoming students not exposed to rigorous standards of research. One of the main connection is reasearch papers is "attribution" where there may be several lines of evidence or quotes from a list of citations.Knowing what is honorable attribution v plagiarism is often a little less clear in a summary paper about some principle in science or history.
In fact, we tech several "hour units" about grants application and using resources like "Science Citation Index"
Was this kids copying the focus of his argument? I mean did he substitute someones elses argument for hissown or did he merely bolster his argument with things that others have posed ? The first would be plagiarism while the second is attribution, and is actually endorsed as "Good" scientific writing.
One of my geology heroes was a guy named John Rodgers, he was a teacher of mine and was a prolific author of papers on the Appalachian Mountains. Much of his work was attribution writ humongous. Many of his works read like the NY phone directory (lotsa characters but little information per each attribution).