@Krumple,
Krumple;169395 wrote:Ah so you are just trolling alright, I get it.
Its not trolling when you post nonsense. I thought you would have figured that out by now since nobody takes you seriously.
Krumple;169395 wrote:All "empty" space is filled with the Higgs field, the Higgs field will "cluster" around any particle and impede it's progress. This generates the effects of mass.
A side effect of this field theory would be the production of "Higgs Particles". Imagine the collision between two particles, which will produce energy. This energy can also cause the Higgs field to "cluster" and give the impression of mass were there is no particle.
But I guess you have a problem with the word "theory".
I should of told you not to check wikipedia as well. I should have known better.
So now you know that in order for your precious science to make any sense they have to insert an imaginary field that magically produces mass. Even though, no evidence has ever been produced to support the existence of this field other than it must exist for everything else to be correct.
Where's my apology? You at least thank me for enlightening you a little.
I have no problem with theories, what I have a problem with are idolaters, such as yourself, thinking a theory is a fact. It is not a fact, it is only a guess. And in this particular case a pretty far fetched guess, it is the same as saying that santa claus sprinkles fairy dust on matter to give it mass. There is exactly the same amount of evidence to support each THEORY.
Just keep that in mind before you post your faith for the world to see.
Krumple;169395 wrote:Funny how you accuse someone and then ask a question about the accusation but then turn around and make the same accusation. Like you completely ignore your own advice.
Its funnier how you can you the same five words over and over in one sentence to create gibberish.
Will you ever give up? You are only embarrassing yourself.