mdvaldosta wrote:Thanks for you help thus far, could you tell me at least though would that be an edit on the index.php file or in the index.tpl file that would cause this?
It could really be either. In fact, it could be a litany of things you or I may not even dream of. However it's unlikely to be due to having made the mod changes correctly. ;-)
This is why the best response I can give you is to suggest that you check your error against the mod or to pay someone else to do so. If I were to guess at what it could be I would only be wasting our time.
BBDS wrote:Whats the latest version of this seo mod?
The mod version information is always contained within the first two posts. I update this information centrally there to prevent confusion (and questions ;-).
Quote:I`ve tried to install SEO 2.0.0 but it doesn`t work with phpBB-2.0.17,
because the code has changed. I think!?!?!?
Works just fine.
Quote:Currently i am using the keyword urls mod by webmedic
whitch also works very nice, until you didn`t have some subforums,
and a some others mod installed!?
I do not understand your question.
Quote:Anyway could someone please give me any infos of the latest version?
2nd post of this thread
See the link called "download latest version".
ibsteam wrote:1. Does it only work for the guests? Mod doesn't apply when I loged in and I see it as a problem if member will be linking to threads/posts with the original php urls and this raises duplicate content issue. What do you think?
The mod_rewrite portion only works for guests.
As to whether it is a problem, it is certainly not optimal and will be addressed in the future, but doesn't pose any real problem with being indexed in search engines.
Quote:2. Even when I'm loged out I can see php urls for the files like:
- index.php
- faq.php
- search.php
- memberlist.php
- profile.php
- etc.
Doesn't MOD cover the whole thing? If not, is there a reason?
"php" is not a problem, too many GET variables are. Most of those pages have no worthwhile content that would be hidden behind GET variables (in fact some are pages that are better to have excluded from spidering altogether) and thusly there is no legitimate reason to further rewrite those urls.
Remember that for larger sites, it's not about how deeply the code can be modded. On the larger sites I run I appreciate the overhead saved by not modifying those urls.
However, if one wishes to do so, it's easy to copy portions of the mod and extend the rewrite for those pages.
ibsteam wrote:My point was, that the members of the forum when they logged in they might link to the posts/threads using long php urls that they see (when logged in) and in this case spiders will find the original urls and crawl those pages again. Unles we disallow spiders to any php files, which I don't think was mentioned in the documentation.
Or I'm missing something?
"Duplicate content" merely downgrades the weaker ranking page out of the pair. The strongest URI wins and there's little loss* to the site.
*The only loss really is that in rare cases conflating the ranking of both URIs would improve it and in rarer cases still would this make a SERPs difference that would mean additional traffic.
Anywho, this will be addressed in a future version of this mod officially, but anyone is free to add address the session issues if they do not wish to wait.
ibsteam wrote:to make MOD working while logged in I removed conditions before the replace_for_mod_rewrite function in the page_header and page_tale files - this rewrote all the urls for guests and loged in members. Since I'm not PHP wiz, I would like to ask if this will affect my forum somehow in negative way?
Thank you.
Users who do not use cookies to log in will lose their session under some (pretty common) conditions and be unable to stay logged in.
aeiouy wrote:
Am I wrong here? If so could someone shed the light as to why I should not worry about it?
Please see my posts to the others. It's not optimal but certainly not going to cause problems to worry about.