@nicodemus,
[SIZE="3"][INDENT]
Competition...hmm...
Competition is not only engrained in the education system of the western world, but is deeply rooted in the psyche as a fundamental part of who we are. Millions of years of evolution have ensured that. Would we be better off withou a competitional mindset? Maybe. Industrialism has made many changes, among them, a reduced need to fight others for survival.
I will say, however, that Government schools in the U.S. are not faulty for encouraging competition, which they do very poorly. In fact, since the late 1960's, a collaborative approach has been instituted within american school systems, with disastrous results. Oddly enough, however, it was not the students that were discouraged from competing, but the teachers.
Because of universal public funding, and the inherent job security of teaching classes in the public school system, even if it is for low pay, many of the worst teachers have flooded the system. These adults have no interest in teaching curiousity or intellectualism in their students. Instead, they teach according to the standard government textbook, created to insure loyal and mindless cogs. No, I am not making this up.
And, as if to add insult to injury, the most competitive Private schools not only make the most money, but also have the highest standards. There has been much publicity about how Public School Students in America are at the bottom when compared to students in china and india. What there has been less publilcity about is how students from private schools are almost equal to the same.
It would seem that Competition not only increases the rate at which new ideas are produced(people want to get ahead, after all), but that the public school systems with a more collaborative approach have failed to produce active, interested learners.
Sincerely,
--Sekiko
[/INDENT][/SIZE]