I have to ask first, did you learn this through some kind of culture exchange program
As for the content:
(1) Peace, equality, justice and freedom are not univeral values, nor universally accepted values.
(2) The only way this could be non-violent would be if everyone was part of the rebllion, in which case, what would they be rebelling against? It would be more of a sudden change in opinion than a revolt.
(3) What do you consider a dogma? Isn't this new system that would be introduced, based on those several 'universal values', dogmatic. Or do you simply consider the right
belief to be adogmatic?
(4) I don't really see your point; what do you mean by viable? I certainly do not think that a global/universal revolt against whatever is likely, practical, useful or desirable.