Electrons

Ok so I have just been educated with how electrons do not actually orbit the nucleus, but exist in energy levels and in 'clouds' which are just the probability for an electron being in that given space.

And there is no way of knowing its state until measured.:perplexed:

Lets say that nothing is purely random, because I believe that a lot, so from reading terms Arjen has supplemented on the paradoxes thread, are electrons an example of an antinomy, or a dialetheia?

Seems to me that we are just not seeing an influence causing an actually well defined path in space, making this an antinomy?

The probability is for an electron being in that given space when we look. For until we look, definite position is not a property that an electon has.

And once we have looked it is undefinable until we measure it again right?

http://www.philosophyforum.com/forum/philosophy-forums/branches-philosophy/metaphysics/2168-paradox.html

What I think is happening, is at a small enough level, the flow of time breaks down and is only measurable in instances, causaciously speaking. I don't like the idea that time is in instances. Time is not absolute. It is relative and of the mind.

I've got an idea about dimension here. What if the dimensions we perceive are only stable under the macro/normal perception we have. And as we get away from the normal perception to the micro level and its opposite, then dimension breaks down, that is, the dimension we perceive; because perhaps dimension is just a construct of the mind as an organizing method of the data construed by actuality.