Reply
Fri 29 Aug, 2008 05:14 am
ANGELS AND DEMOCRACY
As we know God exists, as it is proven that God exists, then we know angels exist, but we don't know if there are independent angels with their own individual minds, their own independence, angels that are individual, independent beings, that were created by God but are independent of God. We don't know whether there are or not, but I would say that it is unlikely, knowing God's selfish planning mind, that he wants to do it all, I would say God is too mean to allow the existence of independent angels. But anyway such heavenly beings such as God and angels do exist, and to be democratic you must agree that God's power, atomic power, should be shared with all people, that all people should have God's power, atomic power. That all people should have a heavenly friend such as God or an angel.
This point follows logically from an already existing aspect of democracy, principle of democracy, that is, that all people are deemed to be equal by democracy by having the equitable distribution of the right to vote distributed to them. Therefore as all people are deemed to be equal by democracy by having the equitable distribution of the right to vote equitably distributed to them, it must logically follow that as God exists, and as God's power exist, that to be democratic God's power, atomic power, should be shared with all people, should be equitably distributed to all people.
This idea makes democratic sense, that all people should have God's power, atomic power, that all people should have a heavenly friend, either God or an angel.
Another way of thinking about this is to think of guardian angels. Some people write books about angels and say that all people have guardian angels. To be democratic would be to agree that all people do have guardian angels and to say, if one person has a guardian angel, all people have guardian angels. This idea also, that all people should have guardian angels, as it is proven that God exists, makes democratic sense.
While I don't think there are such beings as independent angels, as I think God is too mean to allow the existence of independent angels, I say that there should be independent angels. A person such as myself doesn't like God, and doesn't want to be with God, be in the presence of God, be in the company of God, either on heaven or on earth. I can say for sure that I don't like God and don't want to be with God, be in the presence of God, be in the company of God, either in heaven or on earth. This is because since I have realised for sure that God exists, and that God has shared his power with others, but never came to me in the spirit of friendship and offered to share his power with me, I have realised that God isn't a friend of mine, God was never a friend of mine, God never wanted to be a friend of mine, and God never will be a friend of mine.
But I didn't ask to be created by God as an existing human being. If I had the choice, if I was asked, do I want to be created by God as an existing human being if God never wanted to be a friend of mine, I would say, no I don't. And if I had the choice, do I want to be created as an existing human being, and live with in the universe with a God who believes in hell, eternal damnation, who says there is hell, eternal damnation, I would say, no I don't. Therefore I maintain the view that God had no right to create me as an existing human being, that God abused his power by creating me as an existing human being and then not wanting to be a friend of mine. Therefore, I don't like God and never want to be with God, be in the presence of God, be in the company of God, either in heaven or on earth.
There could be a solution to this, that God should therefore created for me an independent angel who will be a friend of mine. To be democratic you should agree to this idea. After all as others have the power and friendship of God, why shouldn't I, as an existing human being, also have the power and friendship of a heavenly being such an independent angel. To agree that I also should have the power and friendship of a heavenly being would be to be democratic.
Therefore, these points illustrate, prove, that true democracy can only be realised by the equitable distribution of God's power, atomic power, to all people. to a person such as myself who doesn't already have God's power, atomic power. And as I don't like God, then the only way that I could have God's power is by means of God's creating an independent angel for me who will be a friend of mine.
The idea of equitably distributing God's power, atomic power, to all people is a logical extension of the idea that all people are deemed to be equal by democracy be having the equitable distribution of the right to vote distributed to them. As God exists, as it is proven that God's exists, and that God's power exists, and that God has already shared his power with the state and capitalism, and people who believe in his statism and his capitalism, then to be democratic would be to agree, to say, to assert, that God's power, atomic power, should also be shared with, equitably distributed to, a person such as myself.
True democracy can only be realised by the sharing of God's power, atomic power, with all people. This idea is further developed in the following sections "True Democracy" and "The Desire For True Democracy".
Therefore, do you agree that democracy to be true democracy can only be realised by the sharing of, the equitable distribution of, God's power, and atomic power, to all people.
TRUE DEMOCRACY
As it is proven that God exists, and that God has always been politically involved, that God has shared his power with the state and capitalism, and with people who believe in statism and capitalism, then as this is so, for democracy to be true, for democracy to be true democracy, all other people such as myself, who don't' believe in God's statism and God's capitalism, who desire power independently of the state and capitalism by peaceful means, as is the true nature of the political concept of socialism, should also have a heavenly friend, an independent angel, as you can't achieve anything without a heavenly friend.
This point is a logically corollary, a logical extension, of the idea that an aspect of democracy is the equitable distribution of the vote, universal suffrage, to all people. As all people are deemed by democracy to be equal in having the equitable distribution of the vote distributed to them, it logically follows that democracy should also consist of the equitable distribution of God's power to all people, for there to be true democracy.
The same thinking would apply to people having guardian angels. If one person has a guardian angel, then to be democratic is to say that all people should have guardian angels.
The desire for true democracy must be based on the following ideas.
(a) That God's power, atomic power, should be equitably distributed to all people, that all people should have God's power, atomic power. And that if a person such as myself doesn't like God, and doesn't want to work with God, that God should then create an independent angel for such a person who will be a friend of such a person such as myself. Therefore, as I don't like God and don't want to work with God, to be democratic you must campaign for God to create for me an independent angel to be a friend of mine.
(b) It should be a principle of democracy that all people should have a heavenly friend, either God himself or an independent angel.
It is said by some people that all people have guardian angels. Therefore as this is asserted by some people, to be democratic, and knowing that God exists, is to say, to assert the idea, the principle that If one person has a guardian angel, all people should have guardian angels. Therefore to be democratic, you must campaign for the realisation of the idea that all people should have guardian angels.
People write books about angels and say that all people have guardian angels. But we know that God exists and it hasn't been explicitly clarified by God that all people do have guardian angels, and knowing God it is unlikely that people have independent guardian angels and although some people do have guardian angels it is probable that all angels are manifestations of the one and only God. And it is not clarified that all people have guardian angels, but that some people have guardian angels. But all people should have a guardian angel.
(c) And there should be such a thing as independent angels. There should be. I assert the democratic principle that there should be such a thing as independent angels. That is logically to be democratic. To think democratically is to logically extend the democratic principle that all people are deemed to be equal by democracy by the equitable distribution of having the right to vote distributed to them, to the principle that all people should be equal in having equitable distribution of God's power, atomic power distributed to them, that all people should have God's power, atomic power.
And as a person such as myself doesn't like God and can't work with God, then to be democratic is to demand the creation of an independent angel for me who will be a friend of mine. Democracy cannot be realised, cannot be true democracy unless this is so, unless this is realised, unless there is the creation of an independent angel by God for me who will be a friend of mine. Do you agree.
(d) That there should be equality of economic developments for all traditions, that all traditions should attain for themselves as traditions their ownership of the necessary amount of economic developments to self-realise themselves as traditions.
These points constitute the equitable distribution of God's power, atomic power and economic power to all people and to all traditions.
THE DESIRE FOR TRUE DEMOCRACY
The desire for true democracy is based on these ideas.
- It Would Be Easy For God To Share His Power With All People
- Democracy Should Be Based On Constructive Sensible Intelligent Political Philosophy.
- That God's Power, Atomic Power, Should Be Shared With All People Should Be A Principle Of Democracy.
- Equality Of Economic Developments For All Traditions Should Be A Principle Of Democracy.
(a) IT WOULD BE EASY FOR GOD TO SHARE HIS POWER WITH ALL PEOPLE
That as it is proven that God exists, and as you therefore know that God exists, you therefore realise that it would be easy for God to share his power with all people.
Knowing God exists, it should be a principle of democracy that God's power, atomic power, should be shared with all people. After all, as you know God exists, and you know that God created the universe, billions of galaxies, therefore you realise that it would be easy for God to share his power with all people.
(b) IT SHOULD BE A PRPINCIPLE OF DEMOCRACY THAT GOD'S POWER, ATOMIC POWER, SHOULD BE SHARED WITH ALL PEOPLE
Do you agree that it should be a principle of democracy that God's power, atomic power, should be shared with all people. After all, as you know God exists, and you know that God created the universe, billions of galaxies, therefore you realise that it would be easy for God to share his power with all people.
And as the equitable distribution of the vote, universal suffrage, to all people is already an aspect of democracy, that all people are deemed by democracy to be equal by having the equitable distribution of the right to vote distributed to them, surely then a logical extension of all people being equal in a democratic sense should be that God's power, atomic power should be shared with all people, that all people should have God's power, atomic power, that it should be heaven for everyone, that it should be heaven for all people, that all people should attain God's power, atomic power, that all people should attain heaven.
Those that put themselves up for election by the people say they believe that this is as aspect of democracy, that the equitable distribution to all people of the right to vote is an aspect of democracy and makes democratic sense, and that all people are equal in having attained the right to vote by means of the equitable distribution of the right to vote to all people.
A logical extension of this aspect of democracy therefore would obviously be, as God exists, as God's power exists, as God has shared his power with the state and capitalism, that the equitable distribution of God's power to all people should be an aspect of democracy, that all people should have God's power, atomic power, that it should be heaven for everyone, heaven for all people.
I say that it must be a principle of democracy that God's power, atomic power, should be shared with all people.
That a logical extension of a principle of democracy, an aspect of democracy, I.e. that an aspect of democracy consists of the equitable distribution of the vote to all people, and that all people are deemed by democracy to be equal the equitable distribution of the right to vote distributed to them, should be that all people should have God's power, atomic power, that the equitable distribution of God's power, atomic power, to all people should also be a principle, an aspect of democracy.
A logical extension of this principia of democracy, this aspect of democracy, that all people are deemed to be equal is having the equitable distribution of the vote distributed to them, therefore would obviously be, as God exists, as God's power exists, as God has shared his power with the state and capitalism, that the equitable distribution of God's power to all people should be an aspect of democracy, that all people should have God's power, atomic power, that it should be heaven for everyone, heaven for all people.
Surely there must be a few people who agree with me on this, that as you say that you agree with the equitable distribution of the right to vote to all people and say that that is an aspect of democracy, as all people are democratically equal in that sense, that then a logical extension of such democracy must be the desire that all people should attain God's power, atomic power.
(c) DEMOCRACY SHOULD BE BASED ON CONSTRUCTIVE SENSIBLE INTELLIGENT POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
Democracy is not about the will of the people or the will of the majority, as we have the expression 'the tyranny of the majority' and the will of the majority can be a tyranny. True Democracy should be based on constructive, sensible, intelligent democratic political philosophy, and also, in accordance with the idea that democracy should be based on constructive, sensible, intelligent political philosophy, democracy therefore says that the independent views and philosophies of individuals and minorities are important and have value.
(d) EQUALITY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS FOR ALL TRADITIONS SHOULD BE A PRINCIPLE OF DEMOCRACY
That True Democracy must consist of economic democracy, that is the sharing, distribution of economic developments among all traditions, as theorised by my idea of "equality of economic developments for all traditions."
Economic power consists of the means of production, and also consists of economic developments, the building and ownership of economic developments. Economic developments are economic structures and buildings such as houses, shops, hotels, places of worship, places of recreation, sports facilities, cinemas, movie studios, places of education, roads, railways etc.
The building and ownership of economic developments is important because individuals and traditions need to own their own economic developments to economically empower themselves and self-realise themselves. If traditions don't own their own economic developments, the necessary amount of economic developments, then the spirit of such a tradition is oppressed and alienated from having economic power.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace