0
   

Categorization in Language

 
 
Reply Wed 29 Apr, 2009 03:23 pm
I was asked to post this thread a couple days ago as an extention from a conversation in Chat.

Example of categorization diversity in language.

General English categorization of 'cat'
In english we use the general Linnean category system for biology, which he based from the already extant Indo-European folk category system of animals.
So we have as a prototype 'cat' normally house cat Felis sylvestrus. We also use subcategories of cats, wild cats, small wild cats, large cats etc... New species of cat are adopted as subcategories of cat based on their general physical and behavioral similarities with the prototype 'cat' in other words exhibits a general sense of catness.

In western mono there is no natural category of 'cat' or a category that exhibits catness as English speakers would categorize. there are 3 native species of feline in the traditional area of the Western Mono, the Bobcat (wihabichi), the Lynx (tukabichi) and the Mtn Lion (ehoka). Background info on Western Mono, it is a polysynthetic language, meaning that it is made up of categorical semantic and grammatical morphemes that combine very complexly. There is also a general animal term (Pahabichi) bear. In the native speakers mind Wiha(wild)/Tuka(eats)/Paha(tree stump)- bichi is one category or they are related species, while Ehoka is considered a completely different category, and the house cat is its own category that has a word borrowed from English (kidi' or kidi'bugu) (bugu) being the word/suffix for domesticated/pet animal. At times small scruffy haired things can be called by the -bichi suffix through metaphical extention, like hairy spiders can be called ?n?'?bichi (Scary little beast), however the bichi suffix has no direct connection in the minds of speakers as hairy or scruffy haired. Not surprisingly native speakers cannot tell me the exact meaning of the suffix bichi. It may simply be a Genus level categorization suffix as this happens on other plant and animal categories such as fruit bearing plants get a suffix -b?'.

Anyway the question I think the person who requested me to write this example wanted answered by the general population, is what does this say to you about categorization, the human mind, and its relationship with the world.

Cheers,
Russ
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,762 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Fido
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Apr, 2009 05:45 pm
@GoshisDead,
All words are concepts...
0 Replies
 
chad3006
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 May, 2009 10:23 am
@GoshisDead,
Different cultures have different value sets, so that would be reflected in that culture's categorizations. A culture that is interacting with the earth more intimately (like your example perhaps) may find it more helpful to categorize animals/plants according to their value as food, or their behavior, or their lethality (possibly the reason for the different categorization for mountain lion in your example?.)

On categorization and the mind: perhaps categories simplify language or communication. It seems to be a universal human trait to categorize things. Even if not formally, some sort of categorization process goes on the mind to aid in understanding the world/environment.

Here's the little mind experiment I performed to come up with that. I make and play guitars, so they have a particular importance to me. When someone tells me they have or have seen a guitar for sale, I immediately want more information about it, so I can categorize it in my mind. I can then better weigh the importance of this particular guitar to me. The different sub categories of guitars have different values to me, which may not be the case with the other person.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Categorization in Language
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/07/2026 at 12:55:31