I was reading and thinking and reading again and I found this beautiful conclusion, a little modified by me, I will tell u source but I want to do it latter to it doesnt effect your opinion:
Quote:If religion cannot be used on science and reasoning(which removes theology), on what then? On Morals. The basis in theology is to insecure; it better that it should be abandoned, even destroyed; faith must be put beyond the reach of realm of reason. But therefore the moral basis of religion must be absolute, not derived from questionable sense-experience or precarious inference; not corrupted by the admixture of fallible reason; it must be derived from inner self by direct perception and intuition.
So what do you thing, is it fair to conclude it to that? I really think this is the most fairest answer one can come up with.
Just have u say