1
   

Is it possible?

 
 
Reply Fri 16 May, 2008 05:04 am
Is it possible to think that the people and world around you isn't just concentrated around you, but also you around them? If I walk home from school it is hard for me to imagine what I look like from the drivers perspective, and I very easily think that he is there because I am there. But he still would be there that day at that time, even if still was at school wouldn't he?

I can't even try to imagine all the seperate lifes that are being lived on the whole globe. Is it possible to ignore my own excistance, and see my own life through the eyes of some other?


This probably don't make much sense, but I find it hard to put these thoughts of mine into words that have a meaning.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,224 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
Arjen
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 May, 2008 05:09 am
@cjames phil,
cjames wrote:
Is it possible to think that the people and world around you isn't just concentrated around you, but also you around them? If I walk home from school it is hard for me to imagine what I look like from the drivers perspective, and I very easily think that he is there because I am there. But he still would be there that day at that time, even if still was at school wouldn't he?

I can't even try to imagine all the seperate lifes that are being lived on the whole globe. Is it possible to ignore my own excistance, and see my own life through the eyes of some other?


This probably don't make much sense, but I find it hard to put these thoughts of mine into words that have a meaning.

Remember that there is a difference between what you think and what is. Thinking of everything is impossible. Allowing everything to exist is not. All you need to do is accept that these things exist. Allow it to take place so to speak. In reality everything is connected to everything. By not resisting; not denying; not thinking it is simply there.
cjames phil
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 May, 2008 05:14 am
@Arjen,
Thank you for clearing my mind ( for a little while) Very Happy
de budding
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 May, 2008 05:46 am
@cjames phil,
Arjen, isn't it still possible that it never goes beyond 'what you think'? It could still be an illusion. Smile
Didymos Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 May, 2008 07:14 am
@de budding,
Quote:
Is it possible to think that the people and world around you isn't just concentrated around you, but also you around them?


Doesn't this stand to reason? I am not the only thing that exists, and there is no reason I can see to imagine the matter I refer to as "me" to be any more important than anything else.

How could the whole of reality be concentrated around you]/i]? We often like to think the world revolves around us. This is true for everyone, and we cannot all be right - the universe cannot revolve around me, you and the dog.

[quote]But he still would be there that day at that time, even if still was at school wouldn't he?[/quote]

That is a reasonable assumption.

[QUOTE]I can't even try to imagine all the seperate lifes that are being lived on the whole globe. Is it possible to ignore my own excistance, and see my own life through the eyes of some other?[/QUOTE]

There is no way to exactly see your life as another would, but we can, and should, be sensitive to the different perspectives of other people. Instead of ignoring one's own existence, look deeply into that existence. Doing so will show you a great deal about the way other people view you and the world around them, which is what you seem to be after anyway - understanding the perspectives of others.
Khethil
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 May, 2008 08:43 am
@Didymos Thomas,
This is an important issue and an intensely-insightful question. It's posing suggests a growing and admirable sense of awareness in the mind of the questioner. Its answer inevitably leads - as all who've replied - towards a sense of perspective of our place, that being that this world and all we behold, does not place us at its center. These conclusions are healthy in breeding humility and and respect for the sheer vastness of the sea of life.

Thank you for bringing this up, we all should be so insightful as to conceive and respect that we are but a single dot amidst the sea of faces that is (has been and will be) humanity. Without this, we collectively digress into a most-despicable arrogance; the likes of which has been a watermark of humanity's darkest times.

bravo
0 Replies
 
Arjen
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 May, 2008 05:25 pm
@de budding,
de_budding wrote:
Arjen, isn't it still possible that it never goes beyond 'what you think'? It could still be an illusion. Smile


De budding, Smile

I think that if indeed things never go beyond what one thinks either one is not seperating thought from reality. If reality never goes beyond thought, is it then not reality that bends to thought? If this would be followed to its origin, is thought then the product of itself? -No!

For something must exist to be acted upon. A thinker must exist to think. For if I doubt anything, is not doubt a thing to be sure of?

~Rene Descartes
de budding
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 May, 2008 04:14 am
@Arjen,
Now we have arived at brain in the vat right?
The thought exists genuinly still, but has been intentionally submerged in a world where nothing exists. The Matrix idea.

EDIT: I read the Descartes quote again and felt like retracting my comment, but I'm not sure why so I'll wait to get burned:D.

Dan.
Arjen
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 May, 2008 05:10 am
@de budding,
I think Descartes is pointing out that the only thing we can honestly be serious about (at first) is the fact that we think. We know this because if we doubt everythinh we are still doubting so thought is a given. Therefore there must be something which "thinks"; or "is acted upon". The question then comes to mind what is acting upon "that which thinks".

I used the argument to show what things we can be sure of. If everything was an illusion (as you yourself suggest: not I) then still there would have to be something that has the illusion. Anyway, the brain in a vat thought experiments are really interesting. We could create a topic in that if you want. Smile
de budding
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 May, 2008 12:57 pm
@Arjen,
Lol, sure but you and Boagy got my head spinning at the mo, I probably gotta opt out that 'action' thread, take a day off and then we can discuss brain in a vat:D.
btw, thanks for your help on said thread, you commentary and observations have been paramount to my understanding (the little understanding I have. Razz)
boagie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 May, 2008 01:05 pm
@cjames phil,
cjames,Smile

It sounds like an analogy of when the moon use to follow me home in the evenings as a small boy. It was a little disappointing to understand that the moon was such a tart, and fellowed everyone home.Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Arjen
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 May, 2008 05:53 pm
@de budding,
de_budding wrote:
Lol, sure but you and Boagy got my head spinning at the mo, I probably gotta opt out that 'action' thread, take a day off and then we can discuss brain in a vat:D.
btw, thanks for your help on said thread, you commentary and observations have been paramount to my understanding (the little understanding I have. Razz)

And I appreciate yours; almost all of the time. Smile
0 Replies
 
nameless
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 May, 2008 05:55 pm
@cjames phil,
cjames wrote:
Is it possible to think that the people and world around you isn't just concentrated around you, but also you around them? If I walk home from school it is hard for me to imagine what I look like from the drivers perspective, and I very easily think that he is there because I am there. But he still would be there that day at that time, even if still was at school wouldn't he?

No. To define existence at any moment requires the entire universe. To define YOU at any moment requires the entire universe (of the moment). Altering any variable in the perfection of the moment (as if that could be done... it cannot) alters, to one extent or another, the entire universe (think butterfly effect).

Quote:
I can't even try to imagine all the seperate lifes that are being lived on the whole globe. Is it possible to ignore my own excistance, and see my own life through the eyes of some other?

Your existential reality can only be seen as/from 'your' Perspective.
Through empathy, though, 'you' can 'access/be' the feelings/perspective of another 'self'. After all, your universe and everyone in it has it's existence in your mind! 'Access' shouldn't be terribly difficult, understanding this...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is it possible?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/29/2025 at 10:03:12