15
   

All men are child molesters

 
 
ehBeth
 
  0  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 06:48 pm
@ebrown p,
I've decided to adopt Mm's posting approach when he gets snivelly.

Too bad if you don't like it.

boo ******* hoo
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 06:49 pm

I remember when I was a kid,
there were kids' sections in movie theaters.

I detested the discrimination and ignored them.





David
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  4  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 06:56 pm
The fact is that 90% of sexual abuse is committed, not by a stranger, but by a family member or someone the victim knows and trusts. The odds that a stranger would abuse a kid he or she met on an airplane is extremely low.

It would be more logical for British Airways to prevent fathers to sit with their daughters. Of course since an estimated 30% of sexual abuse against boys is committed by women (some researchers think that due to social stigma toward male victims, this number is grossly underreported) we should keep mothers from sitting next to their sons as well.

Maybe the policy is backwards.... children should be ONLY allowed to sit next to strangers (since the risk is so much lower).

Then again, if we make people take off their shoes, it might just make us feel better.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:00 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

mysteryman wrote:
Quote:

In line with the policy, BA cabin crew patrol the aisles before take-off checking that youngsters travelling on their own or in a different row from their parents are not next to a male stranger.


Remind me not to fly BA.


is your usual M.O. to sit next to children travelling on their own? now you need to find different airlines to use?

kinda creepy
Its not kinda creepy if u have had your seat reserved
for several months beforehand, as I think most of us probably do.
Its not like sitting down in a bus.





David
BillRM
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:01 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
If u went to college, then Y the hell can 't u speak English?
or write it?



Well my cute and more then likely gay friend, as you are showing indications of being far far too catty to be likely a straight male, my courses/degree was in engineering where the ability to do second order second degree equations matter far more then using was or were in a sentence correctly.

Or being able to solve Maxwells' equations for that matter mean far more then serve or serves for example.

The people with your skill set are useful to proof read engineering reports at one fourth or less of my income and we used to call them secretaries and they used to be mainly good looking women in the good old days instead of catty gay males.

Thank for asking however.....petty boy.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:07 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Well Green Witch and I are in total agreement you are adorable in a very catty femininity manner.

Bet you have a lot of boyfriends that care for you along with older women fans such as Green Witch.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:12 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Well Green Witch and I are in total agreement you are adorable in a very catty femininity manner.

Bet you have a lot of boyfriends that care for you along with older women fans such as Green Witch.
No, Bill, everyone hates me except u.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  2  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:23 pm
@BillRM,
You know BillRM, whenever I read your posts I get this vision of a sock puppet being manipulated by an eight year old.
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:23 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
If u went to college, then Y the hell can 't u speak English?
or write it?



Well my cute and more then likely gay friend, as you are showing indications of being far far too catty to be likely a straight male, my courses/degree was in engineering where the ability to do second order second degree equations matter far more then using was or were in a sentence correctly.

Or being able to solve Maxwells' equations for that matter mean far more then serve or serves for example.

The people with your skill set are useful to proof read engineering reports at one fourth or less of my income and we used to call them secretaries and they used to be mainly good looking women in the good old days instead of catty gay males.

Thank for asking however.....petty boy.
No, I find that hard to believe.
An engineer and certainly a MATHEMATICIAN needs to be able to think LOGICALLY.
Your poor use of grammar, failing to comprehend the underlying logic thereof
suggests that u r more likely to be an immigrant janitor than an engineer.
Your many flaws of logic in your defective grammar
suggest that u 'd screw up all the math.

Your flaws of logic drive me nuts; very annoying.
U ought to be able to get it right; its not difficult.


It did not occur to me to question your masculinity,
but now that u raise that issue, it seems to be on your mind.
I don t want to know Y.
Good luck with that.
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:34 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Calling someone "gay" is new cowards way of saying I'm not smart enough or witty enough to debate you.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:39 pm
@Green Witch,
Green Witch wrote:

Calling someone "gay" is new cowards way of saying I'm not smart
enough or witty enough to debate you.
I think that 's true.
It does not bother me; I have always been secure in my masculinity.

Its not an issue. I have treated homosexuals of both sexes with respect; no problem.





David
0 Replies
 
Seed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:39 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Not trying to pick sides, but you're the last person to talk about grammar and proper spelling of words. It's quite possible that BillRM was in a hurry when he wrote what he wrote. Yet you spell things phonetically over and over on a consistent basis. But before you proof read any ones work maybe you should spell words the way they are found in the dictionary?
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:44 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
failing to comprehend the underlying logic thereof


That's the same brush you've many times used on yourself, OmSig.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:51 pm
@Green Witch,
Quote:
You know BillRM, whenever I read your posts I get this vision of a sock puppet being manipulated by an eight year old.


And I get the picture of you as being an older lady who is a new age nut and now a lover of gay men.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:53 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Well my catty friend the proof is in the thirty-three years career and a nice upper middle income.
mysteryman
 
  4  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 07:58 pm
@ehBeth,

Excuse me, but where was I "sniveling"?

I posted an article about about what I consider a sexist policy that is only aimed at men.
If the same policy was only aimed at women, wouldnt you think it was an unfair policy?
Green Witch
 
  2  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 08:06 pm
@BillRM,
Nothing new age around here, but yeah, I do like gay men. They certainly make a cretin like you look pathetic.
Green Witch
 
  2  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 08:08 pm
@mysteryman,
MM, do you think our government is wrong to profile people from countries like Yemen and the Sudan when looking for terrorists? Or do you think they are doing this based on factual odds?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 08:16 pm
@Seed,
Seed wrote:
Not trying to pick sides, but you're the last person to talk about grammar and proper spelling of words.
Except for one rule of grammar (whose reasoning I reject):
the rule against splitting infinitive verbs on the ground that
in LATIN thay r one word, except for that,
I comply with all rules of grammar (referring to syntax).

I do so because English grammar is well grounded in competent logic.
I am loyal to logic, knowing that by its use Man rose to the top of the food chain
and got us to the Moon. Sometimes I play with grammar,
but I do not violate it (except for that one rule that I refuse to recognize).

Almost all spelling is fonetic in English. When I learned to read,
the teacher told us: "sound it out." There r a few words that r
atavistic throwbacks to earlier centuries when English was
more Germanic in its pronunciation; e.g., thoUGH.
The last 3 letters r only dead weight (wate); useless.
Accordingly, I m trying to show how the word can be recognized
with only the operative letters. This is distinct from those silent
letters that guide us in the correct pronunciation, such as the e
in Rome which tells us to use a long o.

I am trying to lead by example.
I argue that the way words r spelled in the dictionary is incorrect,
except insofar as thay r fonetic. Non-fonetic spelling does violence to sound reasoning.

Some languages r fonetic or almost purely fonetic.
Sound reasoning requires us to teach our children the best way,
the most logical way to spell.


Seed wrote:
It's quite possible that BillRM was in a hurry when he wrote what he wrote.
He always writes that way.
It gets on my nerves when he abruptly changes tense or number
in the middle of a sentence.



Seed wrote:
Yet you spell things phonetically over and over on a consistent basis.
I am trying to help reform spelling by questioning it
and showing a better way. For too many decades, I did not think
about it and I supported the old, defective paradime perpetuating it.
In retrospect, I felt guilty, complicit.



Seed wrote:
But before you proof read any ones work maybe you should spell words
the way they are found in the dictionary?
Not if I 'm trying to CHANGE the way that thay r spelled in the dictionary.

Teddy Roosevelt came close to changing it about 100 years ago,
but Congress stopped him. I 'd like to see the adoption of fully fonetic spelling in my lifetime.





David
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jan, 2010 08:16 pm
@Green Witch,
Quote:
Calling someone "gay" is new cowards way of saying I'm not smart enough or witty enough to debate you.


When a male Green Witch act gay, as in being catty for no good reason other then to be catty, when calling him out for this very gay behavior is call for.

Oh, side notes Ms. Witch what debate are you talking about in his unprovoked personal attack on little old me? Somehow, I did not see that the subject of the thread I was on deal with my many shortcomings. I was under the impression it cover the subject of being look on as a possible pedophile for the sin of being male not my spelling or grammar abilities or lack of same.

Hell in any case most men find such catty behavior patterns coming from women not all that appealing and only put up with it from time to time to get lay and it is even more sickening coming from a male we have no desire to F**k.

Yes, I am being very unfair to women as most at least in my life are adult humans who on their very worst days would not be as catty as our friend David had been here.

The internet does bring out the best and the worst in us as he would never had dare to be catty in person to me as he for some reason feel free to be in the safety of his room and computer keyboard.
 

Related Topics

british airways - Question by rajumukharji
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/02/2022 at 01:44:08