18
   

A personal relationship with God.

 
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 05:31 am
@BillRM,
Are you telling me you are basing all this on a guess ? A feeling ? Why dont I just talk to a bunch of hippies, at least they would be more polite than you.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 05:32 am
@Ionus,
You mean without the cynical abuse of power by non-believers like you, religious people could not be used ? I am waiting for your total figures...just so you dont look like one more Japanese twit with an opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had no opinion if the members of the Spanish Crown was believers or non believers nor does it matter because without the population as a whole being believers this event could not had occur.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 05:34 am
@BillRM,
Are you saying when the crown had absolute authority people were able to say I dont think I will obey the King today ?
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 05:35 am
@Ionus,
Are you telling me you are basing all this on a guess ? A feeling ? Why dont I just talk to a bunch of hippies, at least they would be more polite than you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all I am basing it on two thousands years of known human heart break cause by true believers like yourself.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 05:38 am
@BillRM,
I am a true believer ? So you have the ability to look into a persons soul too ? I was impressed with your guessing..but this is really impressive...WOW!!!
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 05:45 am
@Ionus,
Are you saying when the crown had absolute authority people were able to say I dont think I will obey the King today ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Only your silly god have absolute power no ruler have the ability to long rule if his orders go against the will of his people to any large degree.

Once more read up on history and in this case you might start with what did tend to had happen to Roman Emperors when the people became to unhappy.

Project for you is to give me the name of the Roman Emperor who were chases around in his own bed chamber and kill by his own guards.


BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 05:48 am
@Ionus,
I am a true believer ? So you have the ability to look into a persons soul too ? I was impressed with your guessing..but this is really impressive...WOW!!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just take your comments here at face value no need to look into non-existing soul.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 05:51 am
@BillRM,
Most Roman Emperors did not bother the people much, their main effect was the people of Rome who meddled in Imperial politics.
Quote:
Only your silly god have absolute power no ruler have the ability to long rule if his orders go again the will of his people to any large degree.
I suggest you read how many revolutions there were in history. Pick any country, any time...Even quite countries like England had a large number of revolts. Most ended bloodily...what happened there ?
Would you like to return to topic or are you scared of me beating you ? You know, the topic at the start of the thread...in bold letters ?
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 06:14 am
@Ionus,
I suggest you read how many revolutions there were in history. Pick any country, any time...Even quite countries like England had a large number of revolts. Most ended bloodily...what happened there ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Most ended bloodily indeed as when the king of England King Charles 1 head was cut off in 1649?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 06:19 am
@The Pentacle Queen,
see what I mean? This topic has been so geschmutzed by the pro v anti god trolls that your very point of discussion has been ignored
George
 
  2  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 07:24 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

see what I mean? This topic has been so geschmutzed by the pro v anti god trolls that your very point of discussion has been ignored

Good word, that.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  0  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 08:44 am
@farmerman,
I didn't ignore it. I respected her question and answered it as clearly and directly as regards my own personal experience (which is what she asked posters to do) as I could.
PQ asked:
Quote:
Please could anyone explain this to me, or could any Christians or Non-Christians recount their experiences of having a 'personal relationship with God', or give examples as to why such an experience may be considered false. If anyone would be willing to give any testimonies of the 'conversations' they have had with god, I would really appreciate it- is your experience of God a purely cognitive/linguistic one, or is it a feeling? If it is linguistic, what type of things do you say to God and how does he show you he has heard your prayer? If your relationship with God is emotional/spiritual, then is there any way in which you think you could describe the feelings, and explain how you know/believe that they are from God, rather than self-induced.
0 Replies
 
The Pentacle Queen
 
  2  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 09:01 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

see what I mean? This topic has been so geschmutzed by the pro v anti god trolls that your very point of discussion has been ignored


Yes yes, ionus etc: get your own thread. Wink
0 Replies
 
The Pentacle Queen
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 09:14 am
@fresco,
fresco wrote:

PQ,

From the viewpoint that "self" concepts are nodes within a network of relationships with other concepts, the impasse is inevitable because networks are not isomorphic. i.e. It is not "you" who cannot agree with the other, it is due to a difference of relational supports for ephemeral and transient "self awareness" , and these relationships mediate "personal experience". Thus we cannot talk about "false experiences" ...only "different experiences".

Note also that networks can be visualized a different levels of abstraction, one of which might involve "no-self" or "self-dissipation". At that level "God" may equate to "holistic consciousness" for some, and conversation per se is transcended.



Thank you Fresco.
So in essence, 'personal relationships with God' are an alternative way of narrating our lives?
The Pentacle Queen
 
  0  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 09:24 am
@aidan,
aidan wrote:

It's funny that you ask this now because I just had a sort of typical 'prayer conversation' with God for the first time in a long time the other day. I do believe in something outside of myself, and I am cognizant and communicating with it all the time - when I meet lovely people, see babies, experience something with another human that binds us together either in sadness or joy, view the wonders of nature, etc, etc. and the reason I believe it's outside of myself and not only within myself is because I believe it's available to everyone who wants to access it and not just me.

But I don't necessarily believe (because I don't KNOW) and don't need to believe that it's an actual being or entity of any sort. I just believe it's THE ideal. Not AN ideal - THE ideal and it represents (if not embodies) what works for people in THIS world. You know- what brings them happiness and peace, etc. And though a lot of people would probably see that as being very individual to each person, at the bottom of that there's one specific, communal need that we all share and that's love. So if we're able to be loving and feel loved, no matter what other circumstances swirl around us- that brings us some measure of peace in our lives.

In my mind God is simply that - love. So love is God. And if you're a Christian, Jesus is your example of how to spread that love.

So the other day, I was really struggling with what to do about a friend of mine who I do really love, but who I've decided I can't really help- or at least that my help is not working and in fact may be enabling, which I don't want to do.
I've been really anxious, asking myself, 'Is this the right thing to do, is this the wrong thing...' to the point that my stomach was in knots. I hate that feeling. So I just prayed and actually said, 'God, help me find the strength to do the right thing.' Because I thought the right thing was to leave him to his own devices and not support him in what he was doing, but I found it very hard to do that.
You know what - almost immediately I felt at peace with my decision to do that. I mean it was noticable - I felt so much more at peace with my decision of backing away- no guilt at all- and a certainty that it was the right thing to do which hadn't been the minute before.

Maybe it was just me accessing that best and strongest part of myself, which I call God - which is also in everyone else. But it makes a difference in my life, for sure. And it's the best and strongest part of myself- because it's what keeps me out of trouble.
And maybe it's just because I'm inculcated in the Christian religion, but I can always find peace in the teachings and my thoughts around God.

And even if it's only a placebo - it's still a wonderful placebo to have - that access to peace.


Hmm, aid. You know I normally have a lot of time for your opinion but I can't really accept this one for various reasons.

Quote:
... and the reason I believe it's outside of myself and not only within myself is because I believe it's available to everyone who wants to access it and not just me.


It may be outside of yourself, but it's still inside others, inside humanity, and consequential of our linguistic and emotional capacities. There's no need to extrapolate the view into something outside humanity.

Quote:
And even if it's only a placebo - it's still a wonderful placebo to have - that access to peace.

Well, yes I would say it is a placebo, and yes, a wonderful wonderful placebo for many people with very real emotions and very real consequences. But I can't bring myself to just believe something just because it makes me feel nice/better/stronger/happier.

Quote:
Maybe it was just me accessing that best and strongest part of myself, which I call God - which is also in everyone else. But it makes a difference in my life, for sure. And it's the best and strongest part of myself- because it's what keeps me out of trouble.
And maybe it's just because I'm inculcated in the Christian religion, but I can always find peace in the teachings and my thoughts around God.


I like this.
I think a lot of christians presume that non-believers have never had any sort of feelings or thoughts of this regard.




The Pentacle Queen
 
  2  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 09:28 am
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:

eoe wrote:
Why must there be an argument about it anyway? What's so difficult about respecting another's belief, whether you share that belief or not?

Why not argue about it? If one person believes the sky is red and the other believes the sky is green, that means that at least one of them has to be wrong. And if you care for the truth, you'll want to find out which. It has nothing to do with disrespect, just with curiosity. Religion is no different.


Yes. I think eoe is missing the point that the nature of faith is believing one set of ideals (their own) is true, and the other false. The idea that we can all just have our own truths may be acceptable to a relativist, but is antithetical to the notion of truth in it's traditional accepted form.
I'm not after 'truth' for myself, but I've a lot of curiosity into the lives and minds of people who claim that they know it.
0 Replies
 
The Pentacle Queen
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 09:35 am
@saab,
saab wrote:

Have you ever - I am sure you have - had a conversation in your head with a living person? Say preparing a discussion with your boss, your childĀ“s teacher.
You think about what you would say and what they might answer.
I think that is very normal for most of us.
Some people - especially children - have a fantasy friend with whom they have long conversations.
Some people with fantasy have discussions with dead people of their interests.
You might argue with Freud about his ideas - just to get things clear in your own head.
My great grandfather was very technical interested and he died long before I was born.
I could imagen that many authors have discussions with their figures in a novel to get that person more autentic.
When I have a difficult technical problem to solve I imagen he is there and asking me question about say Internet. Then I explain it to him in my head and while doing so things are clearer to me and I usually solve my technical problem.
Why should not a person be able to have a personal relationship with God in the same way as we do with living persons, fanatasy persons.


Hmm. This is a bit disappointing saab.

Quote:
Some people - especially children - have a fantasy friend with whom they have long conversations.


Yes, and I did, and his name was God.
I posted because I felt maybe I had been mistaken by the nature of my personal relationship with God, being so young 'n' all. Are you telling me I wasn't mistaken?

Quote:
Why should not a person be able to have a personal relationship with God in the same way as we do with living persons, fanatasy persons.


Urggggg.
I can't really separate the notions of 'fantasy persons' and 'God' in this sentence.
0 Replies
 
The Pentacle Queen
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 09:36 am
@Merry Andrew,
Merry Andrew wrote:

Quote:
I was a christian when I was 13, and although I have experiences that may appear to match this, when I 'grew out of' my faith, I deduced that any personal relationship I had perceived was actually me talking to myself.


Talking to oneself and talking to one's god are not necessarily always separate experiences. There is the concept of 'a god within', the notion that whatever supernal force guides your life is within you, not 'out there' somewhere. The Greek word is entheos which literally means 'god within.' Our English word 'enthusiasm' is directly derived from this. I recommend reading A God Within by Rene Dubos.


In this case, could you postulate maybe 'God' in the personal sense is a different mental angle?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 09:36 am
@The Pentacle Queen,
Quote:
I think a lot of christians presume that non-believers have never had any sort of feelings or thoughts of this regard.
.

The present Christian cadres should be aware that non-believers have ARRIVED at their points of view only after introspection and rather deep familiarity with the alternative.
Most of us did not start out as atheists or agnostics.
The Pentacle Queen
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Dec, 2009 09:38 am
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

For what my opinion is worth, I dont think there is a personal God. But I have several reasons for thinking a God exists that can not be communicated with by humans.


Can you elaborate on them please?
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.85 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 11:27:02