5
   

PLAME INVESTIGATION GOES ON

 
 
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 08:38 am
Dick Cheney equivocated during the lengthy FBI interview in the Plame CIA leak investigation.

http://news.aol.com/article/fbi-summary-says-dick-cheney-not/745883
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 09:44 am
Here is more on Cheney and the Plamegate coverup.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2009/110109.html
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 12:13 pm
Wow, his bitter enemies claim he equivocated! That's the death penalty isn't it?
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 12:18 pm
@Advocate,
I hope they (PTB) find something useful and sticky they can use on his old hide.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 12:35 pm
@Brandon9000,
Quote:
That's the death penalty isn't it?


One could fervently hope, if one were so inclined.

And that wouldn't come anywhere close to squaring things for all those people he has caused such enormous pain, such enormous suffering and untold deaths.

One could also fervently hope that there was a Hell, again, if one were so inclined, for that's the only place that dick would ever find that would take him.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 12:45 pm
@Brandon9000,
Wow, Brandon didn't read the article yet he felt it his duty to offer his honest opinion.

I wonder ... how low it's possible for a piece of scum to go.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 01:04 pm
@Brandon9000,
Quote:
Libby was indicted, tried and convicted for perjury, obstruction and lying to the FBI. The president commuted his 30-month prison sentence,


Why didn't you focus in on this, Brandon? Why didn't you make note of how Bush promised to deal honestly with whoever was involved?

Scotty McSuckem: "That is not the way this White House operates. The president expects everyone in his administration to adhere to the highest standards of conduct. No one would be authorized to do such a thing."

Quote:
In fact, both Bush and White House press secretary Scott McClellan have clearly indicated that if found, the leaker would be fired. But Cameron attributed to "reporters and Democrats" suggestions that senior White House adviser Karl Rove could be fired for his role in outing Plame.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1615381



You really ought not to tax those 9000, and rapidly diminishing, brain cells so much.
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 03:42 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Wow, Brandon didn't read the article yet he felt it his duty to offer his honest opinion.

I wonder ... how low it's possible for a piece of scum to go.

I read it before I posted the first time. Hyperbole aside, tell me something concrete Cheney did wrong during the FBI interview.
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 03:43 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Quote:
Libby was indicted, tried and convicted for perjury, obstruction and lying to the FBI. The president commuted his 30-month prison sentence,


Why didn't you focus in on this, Brandon? Why didn't you make note of how Bush promised to deal honestly with whoever was involved?

Scotty McSuckem: "That is not the way this White House operates. The president expects everyone in his administration to adhere to the highest standards of conduct. No one would be authorized to do such a thing."

Quote:
In fact, both Bush and White House press secretary Scott McClellan have clearly indicated that if found, the leaker would be fired. But Cameron attributed to "reporters and Democrats" suggestions that senior White House adviser Karl Rove could be fired for his role in outing Plame.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1615381



You really ought not to tax those 9000, and rapidly diminishing, brain cells so much.

All irrelevant to my post. My comment referred only to Cheney's interview with the FBI.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 03:49 pm
I'm beginning to understand just how low a piece of scum can go. It was displayed, in spades, by the past administration and it is in evidence, large, among their brown nosers.
djjd62
 
  3  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 04:01 pm
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:
Hyperbole aside, tell me something concrete Cheney did wrong during the FBI interview.


he continued to breathe
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  0  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 06:42 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

I'm beginning to understand just how low a piece of scum can go. It was displayed, in spades, by the past administration and it is in evidence, large, among their brown nosers.

In other words you can't name a single thing he actually did wrong in the interview. As I thought.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 06:45 pm
@Brandon9000,
And then, it goes and surprises me!
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 07:11 pm
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:
In other words you can't name a single thing he actually did wrong in the interview. As I thought.


as i mentioned, he continued to breathe
snood
 
  4  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 08:03 pm
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:

JTT wrote:

Wow, Brandon didn't read the article yet he felt it his duty to offer his honest opinion.

I wonder ... how low it's possible for a piece of scum to go.

I read it before I posted the first time. Hyperbole aside, tell me something concrete Cheney did wrong during the FBI interview.


Not that this will matter to you Brandon, but ...
If he really didn't remember the answers 70+ times, he's senile. If he lied, he obstructed justice. Either way, he's a scumbag who deceived us into war and outed a CIA operative for political revenge on her husband.
Brandon9000
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 08:40 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:

JTT wrote:

Wow, Brandon didn't read the article yet he felt it his duty to offer his honest opinion.

I wonder ... how low it's possible for a piece of scum to go.

I read it before I posted the first time. Hyperbole aside, tell me something concrete Cheney did wrong during the FBI interview.


Not that this will matter to you Brandon, but ...
If he really didn't remember the answers 70+ times, he's senile. If he lied, he obstructed justice. Either way, he's a scumbag who deceived us into war and outed a CIA operative for political revenge on her husband.

We're not arguing the war here and I'm not going to succumb to your tactic of changing the subject when you're losing an argument. You clearly cannot specify a single thing he did wrong in the interview. If the position advocated in this thread and by you were correct, you could specify one answer of Cheney's that strongly suggested wrongdoing. You guys are simply calling Cheney names and nothing more.
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Nov, 2009 08:45 pm
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:
You clearly cannot specify a single thing he did wrong in the interview.


are you forgetting, he continued to breathe, very wrong of him in my humble opinion
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Nov, 2009 11:48 am
@Brandon9000,
Brandon means: We're not arguing the war here and I'm not going to succumb to your tactic of introducing subjects germane to the issue at hand.

My sole intent when it comes to discussions on Bush and Cheney is to provide deflection, tangents, obfuscation, anything remotely resembling Sean Banality speech.

I am the Fox of A2K.
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Nov, 2009 03:16 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Brandon means: We're not arguing the war here and I'm not going to succumb to your tactic of introducing subjects germane to the issue at hand.

My sole intent when it comes to discussions on Bush and Cheney is to provide deflection, tangents, obfuscation, anything remotely resembling Sean Banality speech.

I am the Fox of A2K.

Apparently, since you never debate the issue itself, but prefer to "advance" your viewpoint with mockery and name calling.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Nov, 2009 03:27 pm
@Brandon9000,
Don't be so stupid, Brandon. Your sole purpose is to do just what I said. You have no interest in finding out the truth. Someone who was interested in that would allow that it would be a good idea for these folks to do what is right, to be forthcoming.

Patrick Fitzgerald's central theme, you remember him, the man charged with finding out the truth, was that there was active attempts to mislead, that WH people were "throwing sand in the umpire's eyes", those same WH people who were commanded by their boss to get to the truth.

You remember, that boss who stated, more than once, that he was interested in getting to the bottom of things and then he goes and commutes the sentence of a fellow felon.

Don't posture that you're some kind of honest, well-meaning chap. You've shown way too many times what you stand for and it sure ain't gonna get you to no heaven.

[If you have any trouble deciphering that last sentence, High Seas will help you. She's the resident grammatical/language specialist. ]
 

Related Topics

The CIA torture report - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
CIA Torture - Discussion by Brandon9000
Slow Moving Coup - Discussion by edgarblythe
Ukraine abandoned? - Question by katsung47
 
  1. Forums
  2. » PLAME INVESTIGATION GOES ON
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/08/2020 at 06:35:56