What does feminism have to do with this. You have no business judging someone else's relationship. If a man who wants to be a bread-winner finds a woman who wants to be a homemaker, whose business is it?
Feminism is a political movement. As such it has to do with bread-winning and homemaking.
This particular political movement has generated its power from Media.
There are reasons for that. The sort of independent woman who rejects homemaking as demeaning is first off in a minority. This creates indignation energy in itself. And that is transferred to activity: study, getting qualified, relocating to cities, and suchlike, and results in such women being selected by Media to fill the quota they have set themselves so as to look like they are doing their bit for equality for women because that sells stuff and gets eyeballs on ads which are easily mesmerised and can be made to want things pretty badly and know exactly how to go about getting what they want. It's the shop-window approach that paid dividends. It's designed to ensure that family income is spent on nice things such as Black and Decker workmates and antique computer desks rather than highly taxed beer and cigarettes and other things which are consumed where the sap can't be kept under constant monitoring, and that it is spent into the accounts of the companies who pay Media to expose the exellence of their product. There was too much brand loyalty in the beer and smokes market for Media's liking. Some people were known to have smoked Woodbines from 9 to 90. And I read about one of them who got killed in a car crash.
So this minority, and it's a small one, are setting the agenda to justify themselves in their choice and to gradually make the homemaker feel more and more ashamed of herself and her dreary, dowdy, inactive life as if we men are all that bothered about our women being a bit off the fashion radar. It's an insult to ordinary, everyday women everywhere, who are, they say, born every minute, that we men don't find them satisfactorily attractive. We can always shut the lights off anyway. Some men have been known to have relations with women who weren't who they thought they were, by fraud or deception or accident, and never to have known the difference. It's in Shakespeare.
And the pubs are shutting and we have to go outside for a smoke and everybody's going mad about world records and if you're any good at anything it gets crazy. And if you stroke a bottom that's all got up specifically to make it look like it's just dying to be stroked all the alarm bells go off. Even the posh have had it-- "What do you want to go hunting for when it costs so much and you know how I hate it when I think of the man I married chasing all round the countryside with those common county girls in their silly jodhpurs after a poor little furry creature and with those horrible dogs--oh oh (takes onion from pocket and bursts into tears).
Right. Humpbacked bedclothes tonight for him.
It would have been safe enough if Media had equal opportunities in respect of all the ladies and not just feminists. Feminism has an army. It has a hierarchy. A Top Brass. This blog is in the trenches.
And it played the Ace of Trumps. SEX. Bernard Shaw said that if we gave women the vote we would end up talking about ovaries all day long. I know he made some poor predictions but it's looking like he got that one right. Rape was No 1. It still is. And we're down as far as helping with the washing up now. As if there is something wrong with washing up. And they dirty the dishes on their own account. So it's only an extra plate and knife and fork which is not worth getting a pair of rubber gloves for and a pinny.
SEX- An editor's joy. It had to be the negative side of sex because the positive side is not allowed. You could hint. It sold. And they knew which women could be relied upon. Their own kind gave them high marks in exams. Now they are everywhere and they think nobody has noticed. They like us to think the joyous things Set mentioned had happened spontaneously as a matter of natural justice when in actual fact they are due to progressive technology and mechanisation. And whatever else is said it is putting women to work. Mens working week has shortened.
And they might be a good thing. Who knows. I don't. The real Top Brass might even be men. Men controlled Media when it started.
But it's logical that they should do away with men, apart maybe from a few milkers selected on the lines bloodstock breeders use, and some mechanics, just as soon as science makes it practicable. Then they wouldn't need to look good anymore and could wear baggy clothes and run to seed.
What use are most men nowadays? How many jobs are there that a woman can't do and they have a range of toys which make Mr Average look silly.
Get into that kitchen and rattle them pots and pans. Babe.