@gungasnake,
In the beginning for Creationism, there was denial, and blindness was upon the face of the deep.
Then the Creationists said let there be confusion to accompany our denial, so they wrote screeds of turgid verbiage which sounded scientific but had no substance, and they saw that it was good.
After pages of pseudo-scientific babble they concluded that they were still baffled as to how life could possibly have arisen without Intelligent Design so having arrived at the conclusion they sought, they saw that this too was good.
And lo the propaganda of self serving manipulation was laid at the feet of the masses to lead them down the path of church control, and this was really really good.