An animal that can photosynthesize!

Forums: Biology, Science, Photosynthesis
Email this Topic • Print this Page

A salamander was found to have the ability to photosynthesize. Youngersters (at least) have small bits of algae in their cells. Previously there was a clear distinction between vertebrate animals and plants. This is big news!
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/jmogerman/solar-powered_salamander.html

Imagine if we could photosynthesize! The global food shortages would no longer exist!

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 12 • Views: 7,510 • Replies: 22

No top replies

@littlek,

And they got those really cool spots that certain teenagers would find quite fashionable as accessories! Wink

What a cool story LK! Thanks for sharing. Very Happy

0 Replies

Indeed, thanks. This is a significant find

0 Replies

@littlek,

Wow!!!!!!

0 Replies

What Deb said.

0 Replies

@littlek,

That is fascinating! I especially liked this part:

Quote:

In fact, the symbiotic partners were often found bordering mitochondria, organelles responsible for generating a cell's energy. Thus, it's likely that the mitochondria were taking direct advantage of the oxygen and carbohydrate, byproducts of photosynthesis that were generated by the algae.

Mitochondria themselves probably derive from single-celled organisms that animal cells incorporated sometime in our evolutionary history. They have their own DNA and their own process of passing it on. (Mitochondrial DNA inherits from mother to child, rather than through the mixing-and-maxing process of sexual reproduction.) So in a way, we animals all got our power plants by annexing single-celled organisms into our cells. Now this salamander takes it one step farther and also annexes the solar-powered chemical plants producing the fuels.

0 Replies

@littlek,

Interesting. I had heard about Jellyfish that could do this (photosynthesize), but not any vertebrates.

I wonder how many other amphibians are configured this way.

1 Reply

@rosborne979,

Quote:

I had heard about Jellyfish that could do this (photosynthesize),

Indeed---meet the non-stinging, photosynthesising, sweetwater jellyfish of Jellyfish Lake on Palau, Micronesia. They, too, are incredibly interesting creatures.

http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll88/guthobla/A2K/JellyfishLake.jpg

There's more images where that one came from.

0 Replies

Here's a link to the source article about the spotted salamanders:

http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100730/full/news.2010.384.html

0 Replies

Thomas - but the salamander is a vertebrate.

Infra - thanks!

The importance of imagination and experimentation in science - from the article infra posted....

Quote:

Because vertebrate cells have what is known as an adaptive immune system — which destroys biological material not considered 'self' — it was thought to be impossible for a symbiont to live stably inside them. But, in this case, the salamander cells have either turned their internal immune system off, or the algae have somehow bypassed it.

"On a lark, I decided to take a long-exposure fluorescent image of a pre-hatchling salamander embryo," says Kerney. When this revealed widely scattered dots of unstained cells fluorescing in the background — an indicator that those cells might contain chlorophyll — Kerney switched to transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to take a closer look.

1 Reply

@littlek,

There's the magic of evolution for you. All it takes is one exemplar of the species with one heritable blind spot in its immune system. And---abracadabra!---a symbiont turns into an organelle.

0 Replies

Bottom-of-the-envelope calculation: If our skin had clorophyll embedded in it like the salamanders do, what percentage of our energy needs could we satisfy with solar energy?

The surface of our bodies is about two square meters, of which at most half can face the sun. Assume we're all naked, and we can call it one square meter of skin facing the sun.
On a normal day, the power of the (visible-spectrum) sunlight shining unto the Earth is something like 500 Watts per square meter.
So if all light hitting on our bodies was converted into useable energy, that would be 500 Watts times 60 seconds per minute times 60 minutes per hour times 24 hours per day, for a total of 43,200 kilojoule. or about 10,000 kilocalories.
A German dieting book I own uses the rule of thumb that you need to eat 30 kilocalories(*) per day for every kilogram of bodyweight you wish to keep. For a body of average weight, 70 kg or 155 lb say, that would be 2100 kilocalories.

So the answer is that the photosynthesic process in our skin could supply all the energy we need if its efficiency is 21% or better. That strikes me as achievable. Genetic engineers, start your sequencing engines!

------
(*) Colloquial English drops the "kilo" and just calls a kilocalorie a calorie. This usage, however common, is off by a factor of thousand.

2 Replies

I wonder why salamanders are smarter than humans?

BBB

0 Replies

BBB - smarter? I think just evolutionarily older. That's my guess anyway.

Thomas - I was thinking if we could all get, say, 20% of our energy from the sun, that our food shortage would be a lot less. Think of where the biggest shortages are - deserts with lots of sun.

1 Reply

@Thomas,

Thomas wrote:

[*] So if all light hitting on our bodies was converted into useable energy, that would be 500 Watts times 60 seconds per minute times 60 minutes per hour times 24 hours per day, for a total of 43,200 kilojoule. or about 10,000 kilocalories.

What if we assume the efficiency is similar to that of a leaf? How much would that get us?

1 Reply

@littlek,

To add to my last post: even if we were able to get 100% energy from photosynthesis, we'd still have to eat to get other nutrients. What if we got too much sun and had too many calories?

1 Reply

@rosborne979,

rosborne979 wrote:

What if we assume the efficiency is similar to that of a leaf? How much would that get us?

Wikipedia gives 25% for visible light, the part of the spectrum that my 500 Watts refer to. That's consistent with the value I remember learning in my biophysics classes. As I said, the 21% needed sound quite realistic.

... on second thought: the sun only shines 12 hours a day, so we probably couldn't quite survive on sunlight alone. We'd continue to need a beer or two every evening to get us through the night. And there's nothing wrong with that.

0 Replies

@littlek,

littlek wrote:

To add to my last post: even if we were able to get 100% energy from photosynthesis, we'd still have to eat to get other nutrients. What if we got too much sun and had too many calories?

Then I'll buy up dark caves around the world, convert them into weight-loss resorts and $$$ GET RICH QUICK!!! $$$. I'll cut you in if you want because you gave me the idea.

Good point about the other nutrients. We'd still need protein to build muscle, plus vitamins, plus minerals.

0 Replies

@Thomas,

Quote:

Bottom-of-the-envelope calculation:

Is this a direct translation, Thomas? I've always heard back of an envelope/napkin calculation

Quote:

A German dieting book I own uses the rule of thumb that you need to eat 30 kilocalories(*) per day for every kilogram of bodyweight you wish to keep. For a body of average weight, 70 kg or 155 lb say, that would be 2100 kilocalories.

...

------
(*) Colloquial English drops the "kilo" and just calls a kilocalorie a calorie. This usage, however common, is off by a factor of thousand.

I don't understand this. Does this have to do with the difference between how BrE and NaE deals with large numbers?

1 Reply

@JTT,

JTT, I meant back-of-the-envelope. I garbled it, probably because, while writing the post, I was thinking a thought involving the word "bottom line".

As to dropping the "kilo" in "kilocalories", it's a mistake in all variants of English I'm aware of. Germans make the same mistake too.Whenever people say, "I'm on a 1500-calorie diet", they're telling us they're really on a 1500-kilocalorie diet, according to the physical definition of what a calorie is. (It's the amount of energy required for heating a gram of water by one degree Celsius---or 4.2 Joule.) It's no big deal, just something to keep in mind when talking physics with interested laypeople.

1 Reply

An animal that can photosynthesize!

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know