Below viewing threshold (view)
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Wed 27 May, 2009 08:40 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



DontTreadOnMe is one my favorite pipsqueaks here on A2K.



awww, the li'l tyke is so irrepressible.
genoves
 
  -3  
Thu 28 May, 2009 02:32 am
@joefromchicago,
How the fu.k would you know what a good rundown is , Joe from Chicago? Everyone who knows you knows you went to a TTT( for those who are not conversant with quasi-legal terminology) Means Third Tier Toilet( law school).

Joe now spends most of his time trying to get dime bag crack cases at 26th and California. Those with a sharp eye can see that he changed his logo. He used to have a picture of Daley next to his name but I understand that when he begged for a job from Stroger, the Bridgeport contingent would have no part of a person who actually cheered for the CUBS.

But I am starting to worry about Joe. I think that smoking all those used up cigars tossed away at 26th and California( Stroger and Emil Jones smoke nothing but the best) has affected his writing and thinking.

Even though Joe graduated from a TTT, there is no excuse for writing a sentence like:
quote Joe
She does, however, have actual trial court experience, which will make one on the supreme court, and she also has experience as a prosecutor, which, I think, will also make her unique among her colleagues.

end of quote for Joe

What in the hell does "Which will make one on the supreme court" mean/

One WHAT. What is the referent?

Did you take legal writing at the TTT, Joe?

0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -3  
Thu 28 May, 2009 02:39 am
@Setanta,
Does that mean that he can't appoint a disabled gay lesbian?

Setanta, the senile dog LOVER, thinks that the main reason Barack Hussein Obama nominated Sotomayor is that she has his "ideological predilections".

Even my eighth grade nephew knows that he appointed her

PRIMARILY because she is LATINO woman.

and

SECONDARILY, because she has Some of the same "Ideological Predilictions".

Setanta is so naive. He does not know that even though Sotomayor is fairly liberal her record does not show her to be a doctrinaire SOCIALIST likeObama.

Obama had better pay attention to Iran and North Korea. If he does not do something soon except gasbag, he will have no chance at re-election and he will lose heavily in the House and Senate elections in 11/2010.
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -3  
Thu 28 May, 2009 02:41 am
@genoves,
I must agree that Obama made a very astute decision in naming Sotomayor as the candidate for Souter's soon to be vacated seat. In order to maximize his votes in the future, he must attempt to win over

l. the Disabled Lob by

2. GLAD

3. the left wing feminists.

4. Mexicans(Ms. Sotomayor is Puerto Rican but the Mexican lobby will produce even more votes with a Mexican candidate.

*****************************

Can Obama find a good disabled, Mexican Lesbian Jurist?

That would be a coup--Count the votes coming from backers of that nominee.

0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
nimh
 
  1  
Thu 28 May, 2009 08:58 am
@Merry Andrew,
Thanks for posting Joe's comments to Rosen's piece. Glad to see he was as unimpressed by the article as I was.
nimh
 
  1  
Thu 28 May, 2009 09:01 am
@joefromchicago,
Thanks Joe for the additional take. Particularly pleased with her commitment to employee rights.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Thu 28 May, 2009 11:11 am


Sotomayor is an angry, anti-constitution, anti-gun ownership racists
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Thu 28 May, 2009 11:14 am

We never had Souter 's vote anyway.
dyslexia
 
  1  
Thu 28 May, 2009 11:21 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:


We never had Souter 's vote anyway.
Is that we the american people or David
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Thu 28 May, 2009 02:02 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



When will dick less DTOM grow a pair ??


aww, garsh. junior learned him some new words in kindergarten. seems a little cranky though. maybe him needs a nappy.
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Thu 28 May, 2009 03:23 pm
@dyslexia,
dyslexia wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:


We never had Souter 's vote anyway.
Is that we the american people or David

Originalist Americans (not refering to the Indians) who wish
to preserve the Constitution as it was agreed;
supporters of personal freedom, laissez faire free enterprise,
and individualism. That includes David

U came BACK! I was trying to decide whether to feel guilty.





David
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Thu 28 May, 2009 03:33 pm
@DontTreadOnMe,

Typical left wing, barking moonbat rhetoric with no substance or reference to the subject at hand.

The adults here on A2K are talking about the lady PrezBO has named as the nest supreme, what are you talking about?

0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Thu 28 May, 2009 03:34 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
The decision of the court in Ricci was extremely poor. Incidentally, there were no written opinions. The court merely upheld the lower court.

It would be foolish in the extreme to judge her on that one case. Moreover, her record shows she votes conservative on the court fairly often. She is not an extremeist.
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Thu 28 May, 2009 03:36 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:

She is not an extremeist.


No, but she is an extremist.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  0  
Thu 28 May, 2009 04:10 pm
@Advocate,
She is a member of La Raza.
ebrown p
 
  1  
Thu 28 May, 2009 04:16 pm
@ebrown p,
ALIPAC president Gheen wrote:

ALIPAC is launching a national campaign today to oppose President Obama's nominee for the US Supreme Court Sonia Sotomayor because of her racist comments and her membership in a racist organization called "The Race".

"The US Supreme Court is no place for brown or Hispanic supremacists like Sonia Sotomayor," said William Gheen President of ALIPAC. "We hope the US Senate will reject this overt attempt by the Obama administration to put a woman with racist views and affiliations in a seat of power over all Americans."

dyslexia
 
  2  
Thu 28 May, 2009 04:34 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:


We never had Souter 's vote anyway.
Is that we the american people or David

Originalist Americans (not refering to the Indians) who wish
to preserve the Constitution as it was agreed;
supporters of personal freedom, laissez faire free enterprise,
and individualism. That includes David

U came BACK! I was trying to decide whether to feel guilty.





David
So dvid shud we abolish the 27 amendments?
ebrown p
 
  2  
Thu 28 May, 2009 04:45 pm
@dyslexia,
I suspect David likes the even numbered amendments.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/21/2024 at 09:18:54