@boomerang,
boomerang wrote:
Quote:I was thinking today that "English" is also used in pool playing to describe a ball that spins or archs around another ball. Perhaps that's where the English in body English comes from.
David, I've lived here so long that I no longer hear the accent but it occurs mostly around short vowel sounds. I'll have to look through some of his writing to show you what I mean and that means I'll have to dig it out so that means I won't get to it today. (Side note: when I first moved here people thought I was from Australia so I guess Texan sounds a bit Aussie.)
I 've been to Texas and Austrailia so I know
that thay do not sound alike. While walking thru a park,
I asked 2 teenage lovers for directions; as I left,
I heard the girl make fun of me for my failing to
pronounce "lake" as if it were a 5 letter word with an i in the middle of it.
Quote:
Kid's phoentic spelling is much different than yours.
"tr" sounds often translate into "ch" sounds so "truck"
becomes "chruck" when written. "ed" as in the past tense often
translates into "t" so "dressed" becomes "dresst". If you listen
closely, you'll see that they're right.
I 've noticed that mode of spelling in older writings; 1700s or 1800s "dresst".
Quote:
No offense, but I hate phoentic spelling. It's an absolute chore
to work through and so much clarity is lost.
I 'll try to curtail it somewhat, but it has come to gross me out
to spell F as if it were "ph"; I wish we all rejected that.
That was a linguistic malpractice that was inflicted on us, as kids.
Under some circumstances, in the real world, I must abandon
fonetic spelling entirely; e.g., if I 'm writing a formal letter.
The Metric System is
better than the English System
of weights (wates) and measures, because it is based on ten.
There is no question about it.
It grates on my nerves when people give me the Metric System.
For distance: I wanna know MILES, not kilometers, etc,
but that is only because of how I was trained, because of what
I was accustomed to. To me, the Metric System is very annoying,
but I know that it behooves us to adopt a demonstrably better system.
The same is true of a purely fonetic system of spelling.
It is pernicious to carry the old mistakes of spelling
(e.g. putting Ls into woud coud or shoud) from one generation to the next.
At SOME point, we have to break the chain of abuse.
I am not and I shoud not be, the final arbiter of the correct
spelling of words. Specialists, fonetic lexicografers,
will write new dictionaries, but in the meantime:
lets join in tearing down the old form of spelling
insofar as it is anti-logical -- non-fonetic.
Its the right thing to do.
(I can't say "rite" because that already means a ceremony.)
The Spanish shoud not have a monopoly on logical spelling.
--end of rant--
Quote:
I have a really hard time holding my tongue when it comes to
helping Mo with his homework. I'd much prefer that they just ask
him to learn to spell things correctly in the first place.
From this, I infer that thay do not. That 's a change.
I seem to remember that long ago, thay used to do that.
David