No, you again insist on including absurdities that you seem to want me to have said but that I didn't say. The definition of traditional marriage is a union between a man and a women without any of the qualifications you would like to include.
I've asked you what your definition of a "traditional marriage" was, whether it was more than a union between one man and one woman.
You stated that, no, that's it.
I'm not including any absurdities. I'm pointing out that according to your definition - as long as you don't add any qualifications - the marriage I've described above would qualify as a "traditional marriage".
If you disagree with that, you should probably add some qualifications to your definition.
However, again had you bothered to read and understand what I have written, I do support reasonable laws regulating what the state can require and forbid regarding the institution of marriage and stated my reasons for that too. You probably also conveniently overlooked my mentioning that I approved of the repeal of laws that could not be justified as reasonable.
You've been talking about the "traditional marriage" according to your "definition" for quite a while here. Yet, when asked for the definition that you seem to base your whole argument upon, you're content with the requirement that it be a union between one man and one woman.
If you want to add additional qualifications, go ahead and do so.
I assume that pretty soon, we would reach the point where your "traditional marriage" would be defined as "marriage in the sense we've come to understand it during the last 30 or 40 years".
Of course, I'm not claiming that that is what how you would define marriage. However, as you're being too coy to actually define "traditional marriage", yet go on and on for pages about what does and what doesn't conform to your "definition" of "traditional marriage", we're really left with guessing at what you could possibly be talking about. And with tirades of perceived insult from you, as, in spite of the lack of a definition from you, we apparently all have failed to understand your definition.