30
   

Quake activity along the San Andreas fault is picking up

 
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Thu 1 Oct, 2009 02:32 pm
@Foxfyre,
Most geology is 99.999% boredom composed of running numbers and graphs and maps. Ive only been in a few real earthquakes while working . (I was heading out of SF during the 89 quake). Ive only been near one volcano and that was about 25 mi away from Piunatubo at Clark AFB when we were trying to place flags around seismic stations so they wouldnt be buried in ash. Volcanoes arent cute, they arent even fascinating. Theyre like being in a bad car crash.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sat 3 Oct, 2009 01:26 pm
Another 5+ quake in the Lone Pine area and they had a 4.1 quake on the New Mexico/Colorado border today also.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/Maps/US10/32.42.-120.-110.gif

5.2 Ml - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 5.2 Ml
Date-Time

* 3 Oct 2009 01:15:59 UTC
* 2 Oct 2009 18:15:59 near epicenter
* 2 Oct 2009 17:15:59 standard time in your timezone

Location 36.393N 117.877W
Depth 0 km
Distances

* 11 km (7 miles) S (182 degrees) of Keeler, CA
* 16 km (10 miles) ENE (59 degrees) of Cartago, CA
* 18 km (11 miles) NE (37 degrees) of Olancha, CA
* 28 km (17 miles) SE (141 degrees) of Lone Pine, CA
* 239 km (148 miles) W (276 degrees) of Las Vegas, NV

-----------------------------------------------------------

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/Maps/US10/32.42.-110.-100.gif

Magnitude 4.1 - COLORADO
2009 October 03 18:45:31 UTC

Earthquake Details
Magnitude 4.1
Date-Time

* Saturday, October 03, 2009 at 18:45:31 UTC
* Saturday, October 03, 2009 at 12:45:31 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 37.008°N, 104.856°W
Depth 5 km (3.1 miles) set by location program
Region COLORADO
Distances

* 26 km (16 miles) SW (234°) from Cokedale, CO
* 32 km (20 miles) WSW (248°) from Starkville, CO
* 36 km (22 miles) WSW (240°) from Trinidad, CO
* 141 km (88 miles) S (189°) from Pueblo, CO
* 302 km (188 miles) S (178°) from Denver, CO

Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sat 3 Oct, 2009 01:32 pm
This is an interesting map. It shows the quakes on the East side of the continent in the last six months:

http://folkworm.ceri.memphis.edu/recenteqs/index_map.gif
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sun 4 Oct, 2009 10:46 am
@Butrflynet,


http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-owens-valley-quakes,0,6986271.story

Rash of Earthquakes Shake California's Owens Valley

KTLA News

12:38 PM PDT, October 3, 2009

LOS ANGELES -- A 4.5 earthquake rattled a ghost town near the Los Angeles Aqueduct and Owens Lake Saturday, the latest in a series of quakes in the Eastern Sierra.

The 4.5 magnitude aftershock hit at 4:50 a.m., and a trio of temblors at or above 3.0 magnitude hit later in the morning, according to automated seismographs operated by Caltech, the USGS and other universities.

The quakes were centered near Keeler, a ghost town just east of Lone Pine, a small Inyo County town straddling U.S. 395 some 200 air miles north of Los Angeles.

The Los Angeles Aqueduct, which supplies 50 percent of domestic water used within the city, wasn't damaged.

A 5.0 quake started the area rattling early Thursday morning, and a trio of quakes with magnitudes of 4.7, 4.9 and 5.2 struck within a few minutes Friday evening. Hundreds of smaller quakes have registered in the same area this week.

The area is part of the "Eastern California rift zone," where extensive and relatively-recent earth movement has triggered volcanoes, earthquakes and mountain-building within recent geological epochs.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Sun 4 Oct, 2009 10:50 am
@Butrflynet,
I also believe that there is a relationship between activity in one area and activity in another. The converse could be true as well, but would never show up in a strong statistical assessment; that is, activity one place relieves pressure in another, thus lessening the activity there.
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 7 Oct, 2009 06:54 pm
More massive earthquakes in the trench today. In a 3 hour period it started with a 5.9 then a 6.7, 7.8, 7.3, 7.1, and 5.7... all in the Vanuatu region.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/Maps/region/Australia.gif

7.8 Mw - VANUATU
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 7.8 Mw
Date-Time

* 7 Oct 2009 22:03:15 UTC
* 7 Oct 2009 22:03:15 near epicenter
* 7 Oct 2009 14:03:15 standard time in your timezone

Location 13.052S 166.186E
Depth 35 km
Distances

* 294 km (183 miles) NNW (340 degrees) of Santo (Luganville), Vanuatu
* 569 km (354 miles) NNW (336 degrees) of PORT-VILA, Vanuatu
* 2108 km (1310 miles) ESE (103 degrees) of PORT MORESBY, Papua New Guinea

-------------------------------------------------------------

http://tvnz.co.nz/world-news/pacific-tsunami-warnings-cancelled-3053939

Pacific tsunami warnings cancelled

The Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre has cancelled a tsunami warning for the southwest Pacific, including New Zealand, which it issued after two strong earthquakes off Vanuatu.

The agency earlier said a wave had been generated by the tremors but did not give any details of the size.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/vanuatu/6270814/Pacific-tsunami-warning-coastal-areas-evacuated.html

Pacific tsunami warning: coastal areas evacuated
Residents of coastal zones across the Pacific have been urged to evacuate to higher ground immmediately after two strong earthquakes struck off the coast of Vanuatu, triggering a tsunami warning for large parts of the region.


By Bonnie Malkin in Sydney
Published: 1:30AM BST 08 Oct 2009

The epicentre of the first 7.8 magnitude earthquake was located 231 miles from Vanuatu at a depth of 20 miles. Fifteen minutes laster it was followed by a strong 7.3 magintude aftershock.

Immediately following the quake, the US Geological Survey issued a tsunami warning for 11 Pacific nations including Vanuatu, the Solomon Islands, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Tuvalu, Fiji and New Caledonia. The warning was later widened to Australia, New Zealand and Indonesia.


Fearing a destructive tsunami, residents of the Vanuatu capital Port Vila fled coastal areas to higher ground.

"In Port Vila people are moving up to higher ground and all shops and offices are closed," a reporter at the Vanuatu Daily Post newspaper said.

"We've got to get out of offices that are too close to the water," added a foreign worker, who asked not to be identified.

In New Caledonia and Fiji, schools and offices located close to the coast were evacuated.

Fiji's disaster management office advised hotels to take tourists to higher ground.

In the capital Suva police and soldiers were stopping people from going into the central city area.

The Disaster Management Office raised its initial tsunami alert from moderate to high.

A resident of Luganville on the southern coast of Vanuatu's Espiritu Santo island said the quake had shaken the town, but there were no reports of damage or change in sea level.

"People were frightened and some ran out of the building onto the street because it was so strong," a Florence Cari, receptionist at the Hotel Santo told Reuters by telephone. "The sea has not changed but we don't know if something will happen."

Residents in the low lying island state of Tuvalu were also ordered to evacuate from areas close to the sea.

Australia is also on tsunami watch, with a stretch of Queensland coast placed under high alert.

A spokesman for New Zealand’s Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management said it was issuing a tsunami advisory for people not to be on beaches or boats near the coast.

The Pacific quake coincided with a 6.7 magnitude temblor, which struck south east of the Sulu archipelago in the Philippines. No damage or injuries were reported.

It comes days after an 8.3 magnitude earthquake off the coast of Samoa triggered a tsunami that killed more than 140 people on the island’s south coast and in Tonga and American Samoa.

A deadly 7.6-magnitude earthquake also hit the Indonesia island of Sumatra, destroying entire villages and buying people alive. The death toll is expected to exceed 1,000.

Vanuatu is located in the Pacific ring of fire, a zone known for intense tectonic activity.
farmerman
 
  1  
Wed 7 Oct, 2009 07:00 pm
@sumac,
It woould appear. However, the translation of seismic energy from plate to plate is dependent on many variables and the porosity and density of the media and the density of fractures along which the waves are propogated. In the Bande Ache earthquakes, a swarm of microseis did occur off Japan and ALaska several days following but they were (according to AGU) unrelated seismic events.

Theyre still working on valid seismic models and every time someone comes up with a decent one, someone else comes up with some more variables.
0 Replies
 
Sglass
 
  1  
Wed 7 Oct, 2009 07:24 pm
I think the North Pacific is ready for a big one.

Merry and I live at 4,000 feet, so I doubt if we'll be affected by a Tsumni. On the other hand we live across the street from an active volcano that from time gets indigestion and burps.

Sounds like the Ring of Fire is waking up.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 7 Oct, 2009 09:21 pm
@Butrflynet,
The above Vanuatu quakes were followed by a 7.7 in the Santa Cruz Islands which was followed by 5.4, 5.8 and 6.9 in the next two hours.

Same area in the Vanuatu region.

7.7 Mw - SANTA CRUZ ISLANDS
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 7.7 Mw
Date-Time

* 7 Oct 2009 22:18:26 UTC
* 7 Oct 2009 22:18:26 near epicenter
* 7 Oct 2009 14:18:26 standard time in your timezone

Location 12.554S 166.320E
Depth 35 km
Distances

* 343 km (213 miles) NNW (345 degrees) of Santo (Luganville), Vanuatu
* 616 km (382 miles) NNW (340 degrees) of PORT-VILA, Vanuatu
* 2114 km (1314 miles) E (101 degrees) of PORT MORESBY, Papua New Guinea
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 13 Oct, 2009 11:08 pm
This is probably on the Calavaras fault.


2009-10-14 03:27:41
3.7 Ml - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CALIF.
Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 3.7 Ml
Date-Time

* 14 Oct 2009 03:27:41 UTC
* 13 Oct 2009 20:27:41 near epicenter
* 13 Oct 2009 19:27:41 standard time in your timezone

Location 37.631N 121.875W
Depth 8 km
Distances

* 3 km (2 miles) NNE (25 degrees) of Sunol, CA
* 5 km (3 miles) S (172 degrees) of Pleasanton, CA
* 10 km (6 miles) SSE (160 degrees) of Dublin, CA
* 14 km (8 miles) NE (44 degrees) of Fremont, CA
* 32 km (20 miles) N (3 degrees) of San Jose City Hall, CA

Location Uncertainty Horizontal: 0.2 km; Vertical 0.4 km
Parameters Nph = 84; Dmin = 6.0 km; Rmss = 0.20 seconds; Gp = 28°
M-type = Ml; Version = 1
Event ID NC 71299286

Here's the intensity map based on 3100+ responses on the Did You Feel It survey.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/dyfi/events/nc/71299286/us/nc71299286_ciim.jpg



In related news:

http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_13544435

Millions expected to participate in statewide earthquake drill Thursday

Bay City News Service
Posted: 10/12/2009 09:30:45 AM PDT
Updated: 10/12/2009 09:34:14 AM PDT


Almost 7 million people are expected to participate in the Great California Shakeout earthquake drill on Thursday, according to event organizers.

At 10:15 a.m. Thursday, participants across the state will "drop, cover and hold on," the recommended action to take during an earthquake.

More than 5 million people participated in last year's Southern California ShakeOut drill, and 6.4 million have signed up so far for Thursday's statewide event.

The drill is sponsored by the California Earthquake Authority. Participants are encouraged to prepare for an earthquake, both physically and financially, ahead of the drill.

In San Francisco, the California Seismic Safety Commission will host a discussion at 9:30 a.m. Thursday. After the drill, the group will have an open meeting at 11 a.m. The event will be at the Hotel Whitcomb, 1231 Market St., San Francisco.

In San Jose, the Tech Center Museum will have events all week leading up to Thursday's drill. The museum is located at 201 S. Market St., San Jose.

For more information, visit www.shakeout.org/.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 14 Oct, 2009 10:59 am
Interesting article:

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/west/view/20091014scientists_have_learned_much_from_loma_prieta_quake/srvc=home&position=recent

Scientists have learned much from Loma Prieta quake
By Lisa M. Krieger / San Jose Mercury News | Wednesday, October 14, 2009 | http://www.bostonherald.com | West
Photo
Photo by AP (File)

SAN JOSE, Calif. " The Loma Prieta quake was not merely about destruction " it was a force of creation, as well.

With one giant shrug, Scotts Valley ascended and Los Gatos sunk. Elsewhere around the Bay Area, the rupture triggered geologic shifts that altered the landscape in less perceptible, but just as profound ways.

Loma Prieta was a dream come true for scientists, ending decades of geologic tranquility. And because it occurred in a location so rich with instrumentation, they were afforded an unusual opportunity to collect seismic data and study its mechanics.

Using data gathered during the quake and in studies performed during the past 20 years, geologists have learned much about what happened, and why. Their work has improved understanding of the seismic threat in the bay region and contributed to more effective strategies to reduce losses, such as retrofitting bridges, rebuilding freeways, replacing gas and water pipelines, reforming building codes and improving coordination of emergency response systems.

"Loma Prieta showed us that what’s important is not just how an earthquake occurs, but our ability to predict what its effects will be," said Jack Boatwright of the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park, Calif.

Although they will debate for years the detailed interpretation of recent studies, scientists from the USGS, Stanford, University of California and other institutions have made several key findings:

"The San Andreas Fault slipped in a fundamentally different way than it had in previous major earthquakes, such as the 1906 quake. Its motion included substantial lifting and sinking rather than the pure horizontal sliding motion normally seen on so-called "strike-slip" faults like the San Andreas.

Imagine the Pacific Plate leaning against the North American plate, like a ladder. In the quake, the Pacific Plate shoved over the North American Plate " causing as much as 24 inches of uplift along Soquel-San Jose Road, about one mile southwest of Summit Road, while down by the intersection with Blossom Hill Road, it dropped 4 inches.

"It’s like Scotts Valley trying to climb up a ramp over Los Gatos," said Paul Spudich of the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park.

"Although stress was relieved by the quake, it was not a typical shallow San Andreas-type rupture, as initially thought, but a far deeper event " perhaps on a different strand of fault " that stirs only every several hundred years. It taught scientists that the San Andreas Fault Zone is riddled with a much more complex web of faults, some quite submerged.

But this means that the potential for a shallow event on the San Andreas Fault in the Santa Cruz Mountains may still exist because the earthquake may not have released all of the strain stored in rocks next the fault.

Inspired in part by Loma Prieta, a team led by Ned Field of the USGS published a major 2007 forecast that concludes there is a 99 percent chance that in the next 30 years Californians will experience one or more magnitude 6.7 or greater quakes and a 46 percent chance of a catastrophic 7.5 magnitude quake.

In the Santa Cruz Mountains, there is a 0.6 percent chance of that site repeating a Loma Prieta-size event in the next five years; within the next 30 years, the team predicted a 4 percent chance of such an event.

"Only about half of the earthquake’s vast energy was focused toward the urbanized San Francisco Bay region; the other half was focused toward the rural southeast. Had things been different, shaking in the bay region would have been both longer and stronger, causing far more damage.

Fear of greater loss has inspired the expansion of a USGS-based seismic recording system in structures, which will measure construction damage during the next quake and reveal ways it can be improved.

"It led to another startling finding, as well: Ground failure can be more damaging than shaking. Rocks may fall from cliffs, steep slopes slide, and even flat ground may crack and tilt. Landslides caused $30 million in earthquake losses, damaging at least 200 residences. The monthlong closure of Highway 17 because of a landslide further isolated the badly damaged community of Santa Cruz.

As a result, there is now improved surveillance of ground motion, using dectors " essentially, GPS receivers " to identify whether land is moving.

"It demanded greater respect of a phenomenon called "liquefaction," when sandy deposits become saturated with water " leading to sinking, tilting or the destruction of buildings, gas lines and water mains.

Liquefaction at 134 locations caused $99.2 million of the total earthquake loss of $7 billion. As part of a new program between the USGS and Pacific Gas &Electric, a sophisticated mechanized Earth probe is being used to determine whether the young sand deposits ringing the bay may liquefy during strong shaking. Their findings are being used to prepare a new detailed set of liquefaction hazard maps for the bay region.

Loma Prieta was the basis of the first set of recordings of damaging levels of shaking on a wide variety of geologic materials, including soft sand and clay. These records clearly document that ground shaking is much more violent on the soft sediments around the bay margins than on bedrock.

Strong shaking that was amplified by a factor of about two by soft soils caused damage as far as 60 miles from the epicenter. This improved understanding of the shaking hazard on soft ground has led to significant changes in building codes. It also spurred the state to pass the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act of 1990, which requires purchasers of property be told that if they buy undeveloped property, they will have to do special studies to investigate potential problems. Before Loma Prieta, state maps were regional and lacked specificity.

(EDITORS: BEGIN OPTIONAL TRIM)

Because of Loma Prieta, the USGS and California Division of Mines and Geology have produced a set of statewide shaking-hazard maps based on current knowledge of more than 200 active faults. The ShakeMaps depict geographic variations in the likely maximum severity of shaking to be experienced within a 50-year period. They’re serving as a principal foundation element for the seismic provisions of a new national building code.

And although scientists still can’t predict the timing of quakes, Loma Prieta inspired them to better project their effects. In 1995, the USGS and Association of Bay Area Governments collaborated to produce maps of ground shaking intensity for several scenarios. Maps of individual cities are now accessible on the Internet (www.abag.ca.gov/bayarea/eqmaps) to show the estimated shaking intensities superimposed on streets.

Finally, it forced the expansion of fast computer-generated information, which will help emergency response officials identify locations where damage and need are likely to be greatest. For years, computers at the USGS and the University of California, Berkeley, have posted quake information for Northern California. But the demand for information overwhelmed the capacity of the site. So it has been upgraded and its capacity expanded.

Now a location map is posted on the site within a minute of a quake; its magnitude is posted within five minutes (http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs). Maps showing the pattern of shaking can be posted within tens of minutes.

(END OPTIONAL TRIM)

Ongoing research will further our understanding of Bay Area quakes and the aftermath. A deep hole drilled directly on the San Andreas Fault near the Monterey County town of Parkfield is revealing the physical and chemical processes that control earthquake generation. Global Positioning Satellites are monitoring " minute by minute " the movement of plates. And a new 3-D computer model of the upper 20 miles of the Earth’s crust is helping researchers better predict the impact of shaking; because seismic waves propagate through different rock types with differing speeds, the waves are altered as they travel, causing a wide range of damage.

Loma Prieta was not "the big one" " it was a moderately big one, and far more complex than once believed, geologists say.

"The best advice," Field said, "is to presume something is going to happen."
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 14 Oct, 2009 11:04 am
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/index.gif

Magnitude 6.3 - FOX ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
2009 October 13 20:21:54 UTC

Versión en Español

* Details
* Summary
* Maps
* Scientific & Technical
* Additional Info


Earthquake Details
Magnitude 6.3
Date-Time

* Tuesday, October 13, 2009 at 20:21:54 UTC
* Tuesday, October 13, 2009 at 12:21:54 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 52.634°N, 167.149°W
Depth 13.7 km (8.5 miles) (poorly constrained)
Region FOX ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
Distances

* 120 km (75 miles) ESE (106°) from Nikolski, AK
* 146 km (90 miles) SSW (197°) from Unalaska, AK
* 190 km (118 miles) SSW (209°) from Akutan, AK
* 1413 km (878 miles) SW (236°) from Anchorage, AK

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 8 km (5.0 miles); depth +/- 27.6 km (17.1 miles)


----------------------------------------------------------
Strong Earthquakes Shake Alaskan Aleutian Islands
World | October 14, 2009, Wednesday

Alaskan Aleutian Islands Shaken by Strong Earthquakes: Strong Earthquakes Shake Alaskan Aleutian Islands
The second 6,3 magnitude quake hit some 120 km from Nikolski off the coast at 20:21 GMT, the US Geological Survey (USGS). Photo by BGNES

Two strong earthquakes shook the Alaskan Aleutian Islands late Tuesday both measuring over 6 on the Richter scale.

The second 6,3 magnitude quake hit some 120 km from Nikolski off the coast at 20:21 GMT, the US Geological Survey (USGS) reported.

It came after a 6,2-magnitude earthquake struck the islands at 05:37 GMT Tuesday about 91 km southwest of Unalaska, a town of about 4 000 people, according to the USGS.

There were no immediate reports of injuries or damage. The chain of about 300 small islands with dozens of volcanoes sits on the Pacific ring of fire and is often subjected to seismic activity.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Thu 15 Oct, 2009 12:05 am
Looks like planet earth is joining in on the remembrances for the 20th anniversary of the Loma Prieta quake this week. This is nearly on top of that quake's location.


Earthquake Details
Magnitude 3.4
Date-Time

* Thursday, October 15, 2009 at 02:57:23 UTC
* Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 07:57:23 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 37.366°N, 121.729°W
Depth 6.6 km (4.1 miles)
Region SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CALIFORNIA
Distances

* 9 km (5 miles) E (91°) from Alum Rock, CA
* 13 km (8 miles) NE (48°) from Seven Trees, CA
* 15 km (9 miles) E (79°) from San Jose City Hall, CA
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sun 1 Nov, 2009 10:46 am
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/Maps/special/California_Nevada.gif

3.8 Ml - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 3.8 Ml
Date-Time

* 1 Nov 2009 14:55:34 UTC
* 1 Nov 2009 06:55:34 near epicenter
* 1 Nov 2009 06:55:34 standard time in your timezone

Location 36.632N 121.253W
Depth 10 km
Distances

* 15 km (9 miles) NW (319 degrees) of Pinnacles, CA
* 19 km (12 miles) SSE (161 degrees) of Tres Pinos, CA
* 22 km (14 miles) NE (51 degrees) of Gonzales, CA
* 27 km (17 miles) SSE (152 degrees) of Hollister, CA
* 97 km (60 miles) SE (144 degrees) of San Jose City Hall, CA

0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 4 Nov, 2009 10:51 am
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gDLP9AyVD0lWnL-MprPFQgn0rKPg

Pair of earthquakes rattle US state of Oregon

(AFP) " 3 hours ago

WASHINGTON " The western US state of Oregon was rattled early Wednesday by a pair of earthquakes, the US Geological Survey said.

The first temblor off Oregon's coast struck at 1238 GMT and measured 5.0 on the moment magnitude scale, followed 30 seconds later by a quake measuring 5.3.

There were no immediate reports of damage or injury from the quakes, which were centered about 200 kilometers (125 miles) west northwest of Port Orford, Oregon amd 400 kilometers (250 miles) from Portland.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/Maps/US10/37.47.-130.-120.gif
Quote:

5.3 Mw - OFF COAST OF OREGON
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 5.3 Mw
Date-Time

* 4 Nov 2009 12:38:29 UTC
* 4 Nov 2009 04:38:29 near epicenter
* 4 Nov 2009 04:38:29 standard time in your timezone

Location 43.460N 126.773W
Depth 10 km
Distances

* 195 km (121 miles) WNW (282 degrees) of Bandon, OR
* 199 km (124 miles) W (274 degrees) of Barview, OR
* 201 km (125 miles) WNW (294 degrees) of Port Orford, OR
* 283 km (176 miles) NW (313 degrees) of Crescent City, CA
* 400 km (249 miles) SW (236 degrees) of Portland, OR

To: U.S. West Coast, Alaska, and British Columbia coastal regions
From: NOAA/NWS/West Coast and Alaska Tsunami Warning Center
Subject: Tsunami Information Statement issued 11/4/2009 at 4:44AM PST

At 4:38 AM Pacific Standard Time on November 4, an earthquake with preliminary magnitude 5.0 occurred 180 miles/290 Km southwest of Eugene, Oregon.

The magnitude is such that a tsunami WILL NOT be generated. This will be the only WCATWC message issued for this event.

The location and magnitude are based on preliminary information. Further information will be issued by the United States Geological Survey or the appropriate regional seismic network.


http://www.examiner.com/x-6116-Portland-Active-Seniors-Travel-Examiner~y2009m11d4-Oregon-coast-53-earthquake-Nov-4-2009

Oregon coast 5.3 earthquake Nov. 4, 2009
November 4, 6:36 AM

A 5.3 magnitude earthquake shook the south Oregon coast this morning. The quake was 120 miles off the coast and ten miles deep in the Juan de Fuca Plate.

What makes this earthquake particularly interesting is its proximity to hundreds of earthquakes recorded here in past years. At least eight swarms of earthquake groupings have occurred since the 1980’s, likely indicating volcanic activity, not simply plate movement. Resources have been diverted to study these unusual events.

The Juan de Fuca plate slides beneath the North American plate in the Cascadia Subduction Zone off the Oregon coast. This is the source of the greatest known earthquake danger in the Pacific Northwest known to have produced a magnitude 9 earthquake in the year 1700. That earthquake triggered a tsunami which reached as far as Japan.

http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/10/previously_unknown_fault_cause.html

Previously unknown fault caused earthquake swarm off Oregon's coast
By Joe Rojas-Burke, The Oregonian
October 26, 2009, 9:02PM
usgs.subduction.jpgU.S. Geological Survey
A series of seismic faults no one knew about was the source of an unusual swarm of undersea earthquakes off the Oregon coast last spring, geologists say.

The quakes puzzled experts because they appeared to be volcanic outbursts in the middle of the Juan de Fuca plate, the deep slab of the Earth's crust underlying the ocean off Oregon. Earthquakes caused by volcanic activity usually arise along the edges of tectonic plates.

The newly discovered faults may help scientists better understand the complex system of undersea volcanic ridges and colliding tectonic plates that unleash massive earthquakes every few hundreds years in the Pacific Northwest.

From northern California to British Columbia, the Juan de Fuca plate is plunging beneath the North American plate. This so-called Cascadia subduction zone produced the volcanic peaks of the Cascade Range and it poses the greatest known earthquake danger in the Pacific Northwest. The zone produced a magnitude 9 earthquake in the year 1700 and triggered tsunami waves large enough to reach Japan.

Marine geologist Robert Dziak of Oregon State University's Hatfield Marine Science Center said that the new findings should help scientists understand how all parts of the plate system work together to cause earthquakes.

Last year's earthquake swarm began on March 30 about 140 miles southwest of Newport. Most were magnitude 3 and 4 quakes, and none were big enough to shake coastal towns. They commanded attention because of their unusual behavior. Most earthquakes within a crustal plate start with a main shock followed by lesser aftershocks.

This swarm erupted in a steady stream as if emanating from a hot spot of rising magma from beneath the crust. "That's normally what we see in volcanic and hydrothermally active regions at the edge of a plate," said William Wilcock, a marine geophysicist and professor of oceanography at the University of Washington.

Dziak and others at OSU recorded more than 1,600 earthquakes using a U.S. Navy surveillance system called SOSUS, a network of sensitive underwater microphones built during the Cold War to detect Russian submarines. By ship, OSU researchers led by Ron Greene sampled water in the earthquake zone for signs of volcanic activity.

Another team led by OSU's Susan Merle found direct evidence of seismic faults. Using sonar imaging, they uncovered sections of disturbed sediments and displaced seafloor.

The Juan de Fuca plate is caught between two much larger plates that are squeezing it. Dziak said the squeezing forces are powerful enough to deform and crack the plate to produce the faults.

From seismic recordings, Dziak said it appears as if the quake swarm spread to the southern edges of the plate and triggered volcanic activity along the Gorda Ridge, an area where rising magma is forming new crust and pushing the seafloor apart.

Tremors erupted along the Blanco Transform Fault where the Juan de Fuca plate slides against the Pacific plate, followed by thousands of quakes along the Gorda Ridge.

"We don't yet completely understand how they are related and what triggers the sequence," Dziak said.

Wilcock said the findings fit with other emerging evidence that earthquakes and volcanic eruptions separated by hundreds of miles may be linked.

"We are just starting to make observations in the ocean at a scale large enough to understand how the different parts are linked together," Wilcock said. The federally funded Ocean Observatory Initiative is building a network of instruments that within five years will be able to monitor the sea floor across the entire Juan de Fuca plate. A related project supported by federal stimulus dollars, called the Cascadia Initiative, will add seismic monitoring stations along the Cascadia subduction zone.

Understanding the behavior of small, deep-sea quakes should help scientists understand devastating subduction quakes, Wilcock said.

"Not in the sense of making immediate predictions," he said. " But it's becoming increasingly clear that because geological processes are coupled over quite long distances, events that happen on one side of the plate could have an impact on the subduction zone."

farmerman
 
  1  
Wed 4 Nov, 2009 11:16 am
@Butrflynet,
No report of a bigger swarm olr harmonics? Id be interested in how the volcanoes are doing now.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 4 Nov, 2009 11:26 am
@Butrflynet,
We didn't feel the one that supposedly happened during the past hour, and that was a 5.
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Wed 4 Nov, 2009 11:35 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
Id be interested in how the volcanoes are doing now.


Yeah, me too.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 4 Nov, 2009 03:23 pm
@farmerman,
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2010139188_apwacascadesmagmapool.html


Quote:
Study links 3 Washington volcanoes to same magma

A scientific study found evidence that three Washington volcanoes might share the same magma pool.

The Associated Press
SEATTLE "

A scientific study found evidence that three Washington volcanoes might share the same magma pool.

The study published in the magazine Nature Geoscience says Mount St. Helens, Mount Adams and Mount Rainier could tap the same molten rock up to 20 miles underground.

Other scientists dispute the study and say there is no surface evidence of a giant magma body under the south Washington Cascades.

The two-year study that began in 2006 was conducted by scientists from New Zealand and Australia measuring the electrical conductivity of underground geologic layers. One of the authors, Matt Burgess says it indicates what's going on underground.

Most scientists believe each volcano is fed by a smaller separate magma chamber.


http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2009/10/supervolcano_or_just_hot_air.html
Quote:

Supervolcano? Or just hot air? - October 26, 2009

MtStHelens.jpg

A paper published in Nature Geoscience this week is causing consternation for other geologists.

The news, already reported on earlier this year when presented at a conference, comes from Graham Hill, at GNS Science in Wellington, New Zealand, and his colleagues.

Hill is claiming that underneath Mount St Helens Mount Adams, and possibly Mount Rainier in the Cascades " a mountain range in Washington State in the US " lurks a giant magma chamber. The initial news story in New Scientist, based on the AGU meeting in June this year, suggested that this meant a supervolcano was waiting to erupt in this region.

Hill’s work, now published, is based on measurements of electrical conductivity in the rocks under the northern Cascades. This, according to Hill confirmed a widespread layer of high conductivity material under the range. The reason they infer a large molten magma chamber is because molten rock has different conductivity than solid rock. This large magma chamber could link Mt St Helens, Mt Adams and Mt Rainier, leading to the supervolcano links.

Cue ruffled feathers: the volcano blog Eruptions wasn’t pleased, nor was the Oregonian. And now the aforementioned paper based on this presentation has been published, they’re at it again.

What was the cause of their displeasure? The author of Eruptions disputes that the magma chambers under this mountain range could all be linked, and he says that the magma down there is not molten, or at least not much of it is. Judging by the comments thread at that blog, others are similarly sceptical.

In the Miami Herald Seth Moran, a volcano seismologist with the USGS Cascades Volcano Observatory in Vancouver, Washington is quoted as saying. "Other geophysical studies don't support this theory."

“Moran said the most telling evidence that the theory was wrong was the lack of any surface evidence, such as geothermal vents or hot springs, among the mountains that would indicate the presence of a super-heated underground magma pool,” the piece reads.

Ah, but the Miami Herald piece also asserts that Hill is making no claims about a supervolcano at all. And taking a look at the press release that accompanied the paper, no such bold claims are actually made. It reads: “If confirmed by additional methods, this could be one of most widespread magma-bearing areas of continental crust discovered thus far.”

Over at the Seattle Times, another geologist, George Bergantz from the University of Washington, says that this study is the best yet, and calls the study “provocative” but nevertheless something that warrants further work.

Who is right? I don't know. But I will definitley be keeping an eye out for responses to the paper.

The paper’s conclusions state that their work “raises the possibility that the entire SWCC [Southern Washington Cascades Conductor, a conductive zone known in this region] marks a single laterally extensive zone of partial melt in the mid-crust.” And ends by saying that more work is needed to prove the point. Well, at least on that point I’m sure everyone will agree.


http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jY7BvZgxmzBjqHaULI1c9Rgn3lbA

Quote:
Colombia volcano rumbles back to life

(AFP) " 2 days ago

BOGOTA, Colombia " Officials in southern Colombia have issued a code orange alert for the newly-active Galeras volcano which they said could erupt in a matter of days or weeks, according to the state-run Geological and Mining Institute.

Authorities said they are continuing to monitor the nearby Huila volcano, also on orange alert, where sizeable volcanic activity also has been detected in recent weeks.

The Galeras volcano situated near the southern border with Ecuador is Colombia's most active volcano, with five eruptions over the past two years. It began rumbling back to life on October 27, officials said.

Some 7,000 people live in the vicinity of the volcano, which rises in the Andes mountain chain to an altitude of 4,270 meters (14,029 feet).

A 1993 eruption of Galeras killed nine people, including six scientists who had descended its crater to take gas samples.

Huila, at some 5,363 meters (17,595 feet), last erupted in November 2008, killing 10 people.



I've been lurking around this site for a few weeks. You and others might find it interesting as well:

http://scienceblogs.com/eruptions/

Here's the page with their weekly volcano report:

http://scienceblogs.com/eruptions/2009/10/siusgs_weekly_volcano_activity_23.php

It only gives the highlights from the comprehensive list found here:

http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/usgs/index.cfm?wvarweek=20091021
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 4 Nov, 2009 03:25 pm
@cicerone imposter,
If you're still located in Silicon Valley, you probably would not have felt it. Too great a distance from the epicenter.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

did the earth move for you? - Discussion by ehBeth
Big quake in Haiti - Discussion by sozobe
7.9 Quake in Nepal - Discussion by Butrflynet
7.5 Major Quake - Guerrero, Mexico - Discussion by Butrflynet
Quake on Canada's East Coast - Question by Butrflynet
Myanmar - Earthquake - Question by ehBeth
7.5 Quake in Indian Ocean - Discussion by Butrflynet
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 11/04/2024 at 11:34:25