30
   

Quake activity along the San Andreas fault is picking up

 
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2014 09:21 am
@wandeljw,
M4.7 - GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA, CALIFORNIA

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 4.7
Date-Time
17 Mar 2014 13:25:36 UTC
17 Mar 2014 06:25:37 near epicenter
17 Mar 2014 07:25:36 standard time in your timezone
Location 34.133N 118.487W
Depth 8 km
Distances
9 km (5 mi) NNW of Westwood, California
10 km (6 mi) NW of Beverly Hills, California
12 km (7 mi) W of Universal City, California
12 km (7 mi) N of Santa Monica, California
562 km (348 mi) SSE of Sacramento, California
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Mon 17 Mar, 2014 04:53 pm
@Butrflynet,
Is 4.4 jolt an end to Los Angeles' 'earthquake drought'?


By Ari Bloomekatz, Rong-Gong Lin II and Matt Stevens
March 17, 2014, 11:53 a.m.
Seismologists say Monday's magnitude 4.4 temblor near Westwood could mark the beginning of the end for L.A.'s years-long "earthquake drought."

Typically, they would expect a 4.4-sized earthquake about once a year in the Los Angeles Basin, but that hasn't happened for years.
“We don’t know if this is the end of the earthquake drought we’ve had over the last few years, and we won’t know for many months,” said Caltech seismologist Egill Hauksson.

FORESHOCK? What the odds are

The magnitude 4.4 earthquake that struck near Westwood at 6:25 a.m. is the most significant shake in Southern California since a 5.5 earthquake hit Chino Hills in 2008.
Significant earthquakes were far more common in the Los Angeles Basin the 1980s and the 1990s, in which the 1987 Whittier Narrows earthquake, the 1991 Sierra Madre earthquake and the 1994 Northridge earthquake occurred.
Monday's earthquake was followed up by seven smaller temblors, with two registering as magnitude 2.5 or greater, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
The seven quakes all occurred about five to six miles northwest of Westwood, with a magnitude 2.5 temblor hitting at 10:07 a.m. Most of the aftershocks were magnitude 1.3 or smaller, according to the USGS.
Monday's quake struck the northern edge of the Santa Monica Mountains, an area that has not seen much recent seismological activity.
“The location is somewhat surprising. It’s within the Santa Monica Mountains. We have not seen seismicity in it in recent times,” Hauksson said. “It has been dormant for quite some time.”
In contrast, there are well-known faults to the south of the Santa Monica Mountains: the Santa Monica and Hollywood faults roughly along Santa Monica and Hollywood boulevards.
The largest and most dangerous earthquake fault closest to Monday’s quake is the Santa Monica fault, which could produce a magnitude 7.0 earthquake underneath Santa Monica Boulevard. The chance of Monday’s quake causing such a massive shaker on the Santa Monica fault, however, is a small one. There was a 5% chance just after the 6:25 a.m. earthquake, but that risk will fall to 1% by Tuesday morning, said U.S. Geological Survey seismologist Lucy Jones.
Also close by is the Hollywood fault, which is near Hollywood Boulevard.
The quake was felt over a large swath of Southern California but especially on the Westside and in the San Fernando Valley.
Aaron Green, 28, a post-doctorate student in chemistry, was asleep at his apartment on Landfair Avenue when he felt a shake: boom-boom, boom-boom.
"I just figured the neighbors upstairs we're gettin' to it," he said. "But it was a little more vigorous than normal. Pretty surprising, and a little scary too."
Christina Toth, 26 and Andresa Maia, 25, were among the few that were not shaken awake by the earthquake at UCLA. The two master's students were making a model for their architecture final so they were up all night.
Still, Toth said the shaking "kind of freaked us out." UCLA's architecture building is old, the students said, a fact they realized after they had fled the scene. "We looked at each other," Maia said, "and we just sort of ran outside."
Quake another win for early-warning system (8:54 a.m.)
The earthquake demonstrated the success of an early earthquake warning system being tested by scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey. The center’s offices in Pasadena received some seconds of early warning. The farther an earthquake epicenter is away, the more seconds of warning the system can provide.
“It certainly worked in terms of notifying ahead of time, before the shaking arrived,” Graves said.
According to the USGS, the epicenter was six miles from Beverly Hills, seven miles from Universal City and seven miles from Santa Monica.
In the last 10 days, there have been no earthquakes of magnitude 3.0 or greater centered nearby.
This information comes from the USGS Earthquake Notification Service.
Quake can be teachable moment (8:19 a.m.)
Nancy King, geophysicist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said: "We live in earthquake country and we can expect earthquakes frequently and the big one, one day. We don’t know when that one’s coming.”
King said she hopes Monday’s earthquake can be used as a teachable event for residents to be better prepared for earthquakes.
“We need to get ready and I think the good news about earthquakes is you can get ready,” she said, adding that residents can do things such as bolting down heavy furniture and securing bookcases that could help dramatically during a strong event.
Garcetti wants earthquake review (8:02 a.m.)
L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti confirmed the city has no reports of damage.
"Today's earthquake is a reminder that every L.A. family must be prepared with food, water and other essentials, as well as a plan," the mayor said in a statement. "While it appears the greatest impact of this temblor was a rude awakening, we are executing our post-earthquake protocols to survey our neighborhoods and critical infrastructure. I have been briefed by my science advisor for seismic safety, Dr. Lucy Jones, and will continue to monitor the situation."
Largest quake in L.A. area since 2008 (7:52 a.m.)
Robert Graves, a seismologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, told reporters that Monday’s earthquake was the most significant shake in this Southern California area since the magnitude 5.5 earthquake in Chino Hills in 2008.
Graves said there have been a couple of aftershocks already since the magnitude 4.4 earthquake struck six miles from Westwood at 6:25 a.m. Monday. Graves said there is always the small possibility that the 4.4 earthquake was only a prelude to an equal or stronger shake.
“Always the possibility that it’s a foreshock,” Graves said, adding that about 5% of earthquakes are followed by an equal or larger shake and that if it does happen, it would occur within the next several hours.
2.7 quake reported (7:34 a.m.)
A 2.7 quake, likely an aftershock, was recorded at 7:23 a.m. in the same area.
'It was a horrible feeling' (7:30 a.m.)
Olga Rosas was sitting up in her bed at her Valley Village home when her boyfriend called her on her cellphone. Then the shaking started.
“It was a horrible feeling,” she said in a telephone interview.

Epicenter near Mulholland Drive and 405 (7:06 a.m.)
The quake was centered not far from the intersection of Mulholland Drive and the 405 Freeway.
'Felt like a sudden shake' (6:58 a.m.)
California Highway Patrol Officer Monica Posada said there were no reports of any immediate problems on the freeways because of the earthquake. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and the Los Angeles County Fire Department also said there were no reports of immediate damage.
“We did our initial survey and it was felt only. No reports of any damage,” Fire Supervisor Michael Pittman said.
Stacey Dirks, the 25-year-old assistant manager at Noah’s New York Bagels in Westwood, was at work at the time and said “it just felt like a sudden shake, it was just like rapid and quick.”
No bagels fell off the shelves and “everything stayed in place,” Dirks said.
Joe Ramallo of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power said that as of 6:45 a.m. there were no reports of water main breaks or power outages immediately following the earthquake. But he said crews are conducting routine safety checks after the quake to ensure their durability.
Quake strongest on Westside, Valley (6:46 a.m.)
The quake was felt most strongly in the Valley and Westside. According to the USGS "Did You Feel It" service, people reported feeling shaking as far east as Perris and as far south as San Clemente.
The LAFD said it is in "earthquake emergency mode as crews survey our city by ground and air; there are NO reports yet of any quake related injuries or damage."
Downgraded to 4.4 (6:41 a.m.)
The USGS downgraded the quake to a 4.4 magnitude from 4.7. A spokesman for the Los Angeles Fire Department said there were no immediate reports of any damage or injuries. A spokeswoman from the Los Angeles Police Department also had no reports of damage.
Quake felt over large area (6:38 a.m.)
The quake was felt over a large area of Southern California. Metro said there might be some delays due to the temblor.
Read more about Southern California earthquakes.
The original post about this earthquake was created by information from the USGS Earthquake Notification Service and an algorithm written by Times digital editor Ken Schwencke.


http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/earthquake-47-quake-strikes-near-westwood-california-yxdnr8,0,4535905.story#ixzz2wGMekR9P

0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Fri 28 Mar, 2014 10:10 pm
M3.6 - GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA, CALIFORNIA

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 3.6
Date-Time
29 Mar 2014 03:03:39 UTC
28 Mar 2014 20:03:40 near epicenter
28 Mar 2014 21:03:39 standard time in your timezone
Location 33.923N 117.930W
Depth 6 km
Distances
1 km (0 mi) ESE of La Habra, California
2 km (1 mi) WNW of Brea, California
5 km (3 mi) N of Fullerton, California
6 km (3 mi) SSW of Rowland Heights, California
545 km (337 mi) W of Phoenix, Arizona
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Fri 28 Mar, 2014 10:29 pm
M5.3 - GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA, CALIFORNIA

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 5.3
Date-Time
29 Mar 2014 04:09:41 UTC
28 Mar 2014 21:09:42 near epicenter
28 Mar 2014 22:09:41 standard time in your timezone
Location 33.929N 117.922W
Depth 1 km
Distances
2 km (1 mi) E of La Habra, California
2 km (1 mi) WNW of Brea, California
5 km (3 mi) SSW of Rowland Heights, California
6 km (3 mi) N of Fullerton, California
544 km (337 mi) W of Phoenix, Arizona
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Fri 28 Mar, 2014 10:34 pm
http://www.trbimg.com/img-5336480d/turbine/earthquake-53-quake-strikes-near-la-habra-california-k2al0i-photo/600

By Ken Schwencke, Kim Murphy and Shelby Grad
March 28, 2014, 9:26 p.m.
A shallow magnitude 5.3 earthquake was reported Friday evening one mile from La Habra, California, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. The temblor occurred at 9:09 p.m. Pacific time at a depth of 0.6 miles.
Updated at 9:26 p.m.
In Orange, a few miles to the east of the epicenter, patrons at BJs Brewery went from boisterous conversation to tense silence. The suspended LED lights swayed. The vodka behind the bar stayed where it was. When it was over, the room erupted in applause.
Updated at 9:23 p.m.
The 5.3 magitude quake occurred a few minutes after two smaller quakes, which appear to have been foreshocks.
Updated at 9:22 p.m.
Residents in Orange County reported the quake lasted for about 10 seconds. They said they felt gradual shaking.
Updated at 9:16 p.m.
The quake was felt across a large swath of Southern California. There were no immediate reports of damage. The Los Angeles Fire Department said it is going into emergency mode and looking for signs of damage or injuries.
According to the USGS, the epicenter was one mile from Brea, California, three miles from Rowland Heights, California, three miles from Fullerton, California and 337 miles from Phoenix, Arizona.
In the past ten days, there has been one earthquake magnitude 3.0 and greater centered nearby.
This information comes from the USGS Earthquake Notification Service and this post was created by an algorithm written by the author.


http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/earthquake-53-quake-strikes-near-la-habra-california-k2al0i,0,5399191.story#ixzz2xK4ymiis
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 28 Mar, 2014 10:36 pm
@Butrflynet,
General Lee just posted about this set on FB. He's inches from La Habra.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 06:59 pm
This is looking promising.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-earthquake-prototype-early-warning-system-20140329,0,6637333.story#axzz2xK4QunUr

By Rong-Gong Lin II
March 29, 2014, 12:02 p.m.
A prototype earthquake early-warning system worked again Friday night, giving seismologists in Pasadena about a four-second heads-up before shaking was felt from the magnitude 5.1 quake that struck near La Habra.
The system is being tested by a team of scientists on a U.S. Geological Survey project to create a statewide network.
USGS seismologist Lucy Jones has said the system works because while earthquakes travel at the speed of sound, sensors that initially detect the shaking near the epicenter of a quake can send a message faster -- at the speed of light -- to warn residents farther away that the quake is coming.
The system being tested by scientists at the USGS and Caltech previously gave officials at the Pasadena center about a two-second warning ahead of a magnitude 4.4 earthquake that struck near Westwood in March.
Once developed, the system could give downtown Los Angeles 40 to 50 seconds of warning that the “Big One” was headed from the San Andreas fault, giving time for elevators to stop at the next floor and open up, firefighters to open up garage doors, high-speed trains to slow down to avoid derailment and surgeons to take the scalpel out of a patient.
A lack of funds, however, is preventing the system from being ready for prime time.
“It’s just a matter of obtaining the funding,” said USGS seismologist Robert Graves. It would cost about an estimated $80 million to get the system up and running.
FULL COVERAGE: California earthquakes
The lack of funding means that some earthquake-sensing stations aren’t maintained, so the network isn’t yet reliable enough, Jones said.
For example, the nearest seismic warning station near the 6.8 earthquake off the California’s northern coast on March 10 was out of order when that temblor hit, she said.
California lawmakers last year passed legislation that prohibits spending state General Fund money on the early-warning system, leaving the state’s Office of Emergency Services to look for other sources, both private and public, to cover costs.
Some scientists see that mandate as a setback for the project, which still requires installation of many more ground sensors across the state as well as additional money to operate the network.
INTERACTIVE: Explore large earthquakes in the Los Angeles area

Last year, the earthquake scientists received about $5 million from a federal grant to begin purchasing 100 new sensor stations for Southern California. But without funds to operate it, it’s like buying a car but not having enough money for gasoline, officials said.


http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-earthquake-prototype-early-warning-system-20140329,0,6637333.story#ixzz2xP3gUbQr
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 07:03 pm
@Butrflynet,
5.1 earthquake: Significant damage reported in some areas


By Louis Sahagun and Catherine Saillant
March 29, 2014, 1:18 p.m.
A series of temblors, punctuated by a magnitude 5.1 earthquake Friday night near La Habra, did more than just rattle nerves a few miles away in Fullerton, where residents had to deal with no water service, property damage and, in some cases, finding other accommodations.
Throughout the city, crews were working to repair broken water mains, leaking gas lines and other damage.
At least seven 8-inch water mains were broken, leaving an estimated 100 homes and businesses without water Saturday morning, officials said.
PHOTOS: 5.1 earthquake rattles L.A., Orange County
In the middle of the intersection of Gilbert Street and Rosecrans, a crew armed with shovels, earth movers and massive stainless water main clamps labored in a 12-by-20-foot hole eight feet under the pavement.
“We have five leaks as big as this one in this area alone,” worker Ed McClain said. “None of us slept a wink last night. We’ll keep going until these problems are fixed.”
Swaths of Gilbert Street had also been undermined by gushing water, leaving bowl-shaped depressions in the roadway.
Among those left high and dry was Sarah Lee, director of a nearby college preparatory business.
“Let me show you what we’re dealing with,” she said, turning the handle of the bathroom sink faucet. “Nothing.”
Lee then tapped the toilet handle and frowned: “Nothing.”
In the nearby community of Brea, which is served by the Fullerton Fire Department, a broken water main caused "moderate to heavy damage" at City Hall, said Fullerton fire Battalion Chief John Stokes.
In all, more than 70 people remained displaced at midday Saturday -- 54 of them from an apartment complex in the 2600 block of Associated Road where 20 units were red-tagged after the building suffered a cracked foundation, Stokes said.
Cracks of up to 2 inches wide could be seen extending roughly 30 feet into the property and building.
Fullerton firefighters also red-tagged six residences that had been found to be unsafe for occupancy, said Tom Schultz, the department's deputy chief of operations.
Officials had initially reported eight homes as having been red-tagged, but Schultz said that number was revised after a full survey of the city.
Most of the damaged residences are in northern Fullerton, closer to the epicenter of the magnitude 5.1 quake that struck at 9:09 p.m. near La Habra, where 38 people spent the night at a Red Cross shelter. The quake was part of a swarm of temblors that started with a magnitude 3.6 quake at 8:03 p.m.
FULL COVERAGE: California earthquakes
The quake also left its mark at dozens of homes in the vicinity of El Rancho Vista and Calle Candela in Fullerton: cracked stucco, collapsed brick walls and toppled mailboxes. The shaking also knocked over two life-size statues.
Standing next to a barrel filled to the brim with broken porcelain dishes, Denis Lesemme, a neighborhood resident since 1963, sighed and said, “Last night, after it happened, I wasn’t nervous or scared.”
“But look at me now,” he added, extended his arms to display his trembling hands. “I’ve never shaken like this before in my life."



http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-earthquake-damage-reported-20140329,0,3318303.story#ixzz2xP48Xww3
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sun 30 Mar, 2014 01:16 am
A lot of activity in Oklahoma tonight.
M4.3 - OKLAHOMA

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 4.3
Date-Time
30 Mar 2014 06:51:56 UTC
30 Mar 2014 01:51:56 near epicenter
30 Mar 2014 00:51:56 standard time in your timezone
Location 36.159N 97.552W
Depth 5 km
Distances
23 km (14 mi) N of Crescent, Oklahoma
33 km (20 mi) NNW of Guthrie, Oklahoma
39 km (24 mi) SE of Enid, Oklahoma
44 km (27 mi) W of Stillwater, Oklahoma
76 km (47 mi) N of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

M3.5 - OKLAHOMA

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 3.5
Date-Time
30 Mar 2014 06:37:44 UTC
30 Mar 2014 01:37:44 near epicenter
30 Mar 2014 00:37:44 standard time in your timezone
Location 36.145N 97.618W
Depth 4 km
Distances
21 km (13 mi) N of Crescent, Oklahoma
34 km (21 mi) NNW of Guthrie, Oklahoma
36 km (22 mi) SE of Enid, Oklahoma
50 km (31 mi) W of Stillwater, Oklahoma
75 km (46 mi) N of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

M3.5 - OKLAHOMA

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 3.5
Date-Time
30 Mar 2014 03:55:33 UTC
29 Mar 2014 22:55:34 near epicenter
29 Mar 2014 21:55:33 standard time in your timezone
Location 36.145N 97.625W
Depth 5 km
Distances
21 km (13 mi) N of Crescent, Oklahoma
34 km (21 mi) NNW of Guthrie, Oklahoma
35 km (21 mi) SE of Enid, Oklahoma
51 km (31 mi) W of Stillwater, Oklahoma
75 km (46 mi) N of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

M3.7 - OKLAHOMA

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 3.7
Date-Time
30 Mar 2014 03:08:31 UTC
29 Mar 2014 22:08:31 near epicenter
29 Mar 2014 21:08:31 standard time in your timezone
Location 35.498N 97.224W
Depth 6 km
Distances
4 km (2 mi) E of Choctaw, Oklahoma
16 km (9 mi) ENE of Midwest City, Oklahoma
20 km (12 mi) ENE of Del City, Oklahoma
26 km (16 mi) E of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
28 km (17 mi) SE of Edmond, Oklahoma
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sun 30 Mar, 2014 09:55 am
The Oklahoma earthquake swarm continues and now Yellowstone is getting into the act.

M4.8 - YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 4.8
Date-Time
30 Mar 2014 12:34:42 UTC
30 Mar 2014 06:34:42 near epicenter
30 Mar 2014 06:34:42 standard time in your timezone
Location 44.773N 110.660W
Depth 5 km
Distances
37 km (22 mi) ENE of West Yellowstone, Montana
105 km (65 mi) SSE of Bozeman, Montana
138 km (85 mi) NE of Rexburg, Idaho
178 km (110 mi) NE of Ammon, Idaho
228 km (141 mi) SSE of Helena, Montana


M4.3 - OKLAHOMA

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 4.3
Date-Time
30 Mar 2014 08:42:36 UTC
30 Mar 2014 03:42:36 near epicenter
30 Mar 2014 02:42:36 standard time in your timezone
Location 36.169N 97.587W
Depth 4 km
Distances
23 km (14 mi) N of Crescent, Oklahoma
35 km (21 mi) NNW of Guthrie, Oklahoma
36 km (22 mi) SE of Enid, Oklahoma
47 km (29 mi) W of Stillwater, Oklahoma
78 km (48 mi) N of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sun 30 Mar, 2014 10:05 am
@Butrflynet,

Oklahoma Earthquakes: Ongoing Swarm Produces State's Strongest Quakes of 2014

WICHITA, Kan. -- A 4.4 magnitude earthquake rattled central Oklahoma Sunday morning and was felt in south-central Kansas.

The U.S. Geological Survey reports the temblor was recorded at 9:09 a.m. about 13 miles north-northwest of Crescent, Okla. That's about 25 miles southeast of Enid.

It's the strongest in a series of quakes since Saturday night. Several people in south-central Kansas reported feeling the shaker before the official USGS report.

Previous story:
Two magnitude 4.3 quakes, along with several weaker ones, rattled central Oklahoma late Saturday night into Sunday morning. And residents throughout KAKEland report feeling the temblors.

The first quake, a magnitude of 3.5, was recorded just before 11 p.m. Saturday It was centered about 13 miles north of the town of Crescent. At the same location, another 3.5 occurred at 1:37 a.m. Sunday. It was followed by a 4.3 about 15 minutes later and then a 3.3 at 2 a.m.

A 3.5 and a 3.6 were recorded between 3:07 and 3:10 a.m. A second 4.3 followed at 3:42 a.m. They were also centered about 13 miles north of Crescent.

The latest in that area was a 3.2 recorded at 7:49 a.m.

But wait. There's more.

A 2.8 tremor occurred at 4:06 a.m. and a 2.7 at 4:51 a.m. Both were a few miles south and west of the others.

The KAKE newsroom has been inundated with calls since the quakes were felt in south-central Kansas. A KAKE employee reported feeling his apartment shake for a few seconds near downtown Wichita.

We have received reports from across Wichita and portions of Butler County from viewers reporting feeling the earthquake. The USGS has received reports from across Oklahoma and Kansas, including the Kansas City-area.

One Wichita resident reported feeling three tremors at her apartment near Harry and Rock Road.

"I thought nothing of tonight's until I was turning off my hall light and noticed my picture on the wall was crooked," she said in an email to KAKE News.

She then noticed a long crack in her wall, shown in the picture below.

"17 inches long by 7 inches at the bottom," she said. "This most definitely happened tonight. It's by our front door hall and we pass it countless times a day."


We're still not done yet.

Let's go back to Saturday and venture a little further south-southeast to Choctaw. That's on the eastern edge of Oklahoma City, and where at 2.7 tremor was reported at 7:36 a.m. Another of the same magnitude hit at 4:36 p.m. A 3.7 occurred at 10:08 p.m., followed a 2.6 at 12:49 a.m. Sunday.

Several earthquake reports ranging from a 2.7 to a 3.5 were scattered about central Oklahoma from Wednesday through Friday.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 1 Apr, 2014 06:53 pm
M8.2 - NEAR THE COAST OF TARAPACA, CHILE

Preliminary Earthquake Report
Magnitude 8.2
Date-Time
1 Apr 2014 23:46:45 UTC
1 Apr 2014 18:46:45 near epicenter
1 Apr 2014 17:46:45 standard time in your timezone
Location 19.630S 70.863W
Depth 10 km
Distances
99 km (61 mi) NW of Iquique, Chile
140 km (86 mi) SSW of Arica, Chile
191 km (118 mi) SSW of Tacna, Peru
225 km (139 mi) SSE of Ilo, Peru
449 km (278 mi) SW of La Paz, Bolivia
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 1 Apr, 2014 06:55 pm
@Butrflynet,

000
WEHW42 PHEB 020035
TIBHWX
HIZ001>003-005>009-012>014-016>021-023>026-020235-

TSUNAMI INFORMATION STATEMENT NUMBER 3
NWS PACIFIC TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER EWA BEACH HI
235 PM HST TUE APR 01 2014

TO - CIVIL DEFENSE IN THE STATE OF HAWAII

SUBJECT - TSUNAMI INFORMATION STATEMENT

THIS STATEMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED AT
THIS TIME. HOWEVER... THE TSUNAMI THREAT TO HAWAII IS STILL
BEING EVALUATED.

AN EARTHQUAKE HAS OCCURRED WITH THESE PRELIMINARY PARAMETERS

ORIGIN TIME - 0147 PM HST 01 APR 2014
COORDINATES - 19.8 SOUTH 70.8 WEST
LOCATION - OFF THE COAST OF NORTHERN CHILE
MAGNITUDE - 8.2 MOMENT

EVALUATION

THE PACIFIC TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER HAS ISSUED AN EXPANDING
REGIONAL TSUNAMI WARNING AND WATCH FOR PARTS OF THE PACIFIC
LOCATED CLOSER TO THE EARTHQUAKE. AN EVALUATION OF THE PACIFIC
WIDE TSUNAMI THREAT IS UNDERWAY AND THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT
HAWAII COULD BE ELEVATED TO A WATCH OR WARNING STATUS.

IF TSUNAMI WAVES IMPACT HAWAII THEIR ESTIMATED EARLIEST ARRIVAL
TIME IS

0324 AM HST WED 02 APR 2014

FURTHER STATEMENTS WILL BE ISSUED HOURLY OR SOONER AS CONDITIONS
WARRANT UNTIL THE THREAT TO HAWAII HAS PASSED.

$$
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Tue 1 Apr, 2014 06:57 pm
@Butrflynet,
Uh oh, on the Chile quake..
plus possible tsunami.
ehBeth
 
  1  
Tue 1 Apr, 2014 07:13 pm
@ossobuco,
thinking about miners in Chile

always problematic
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 1 Apr, 2014 07:21 pm
A tsunami warning was in effect for Chile, Peru and Ecuador.

Chile's National Emergency Office tweeted Tuesday night that it was asking everyone to evacuate the South American nation's coast.

A tsunami watch was issued for Colombia, Panama and Costa Rica, according to the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center.

The tsunami threat to Hawaii still was being evaluated. The U.S. National Tsunami Warning Center was working to determine the level of danger for Alaska, Washington, Oregon and California, as well as Canada's British Columbia.
"Sea level readings indicate a tsunami was generated. It may have been destructive along coasts near the epicenter and could also be a threat to more distant coasts," the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center said in its evaluation.
Tsunami waves of more than 6 feet generated by the earthquake had already washed ashore on the coast of Pisagua, Chile, said Victor Sardino with the center.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 1 Apr, 2014 08:43 pm
@ehBeth,
Doesn't sound good...

http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-chile-earthquake-tsunami-20140401,0,7630963.story



Blackouts, telephone outages and highway damage were reported in northern Chile, and tsunami warnings remained in effect after a massive earthquake struck Tuesday evening off that nation's Pacific coast.
The U.S. Geological Survey upgraded the earthquake to magnitude 8.2 shortly after it struck at 8:46 p.m. about 50 miles southwest of Cuya, about 950 miles north of the capital, Santiago.
Major damage was reported to Highway A16 north of Iquique, a major port city of about 182,000 people at the edge of Chile’s copper mining Atacama desert region.
With the exception of Iquique, the regions closest to the epicenter of the quake are remote and sparsely populated. Pisagua, about 65 miles north of Iquique, has fewer than 300 inhabitants, and the town of Arica, about 120 miles north of Iquique, has about 10,600 residents, according to recent census data. The Arica and Parinacota regions where the quake was felt strongly have a combined population of about 215,000.
The Chilean navy’s oceanographic center reported wave heights of 5 feet in Iquique, and of greater than 6 feet in Pisagua.
Much of the Chilean coast borders the oceanic Nazca plate, which is being pushed under the continental South America plate, creating a geologic hotspot responsible for the creation of the Andes Mountains.
That pressure can produce earthquakes greater than magnitude 9.0, the same class of temblor that caused the 2004 Sumatra and 2011 Japan tsunamis.
Southern Chile produced the most powerful earthquake on record, a magnitude 9.5 earthquake in 1960, which killed thousands around the city of Valdivia, and brought tsunamis to Hawaii, Japan, the Philippines and the U.S. West Coast.
Although the quake is off the northern coast, cities up and down the length of the country were put on high alert, including Talcahuano and Dichato, more than 1,100 miles south, where a magnitude 8.8 earthquake killed 524 people and destroyed 220,000 homes in 2010.
A magnitude 7.1 quake in central Chile struck 11 months later, rattling nerves following the previous year’s devastation, but caused little damage or injury.
Swarms of earthquakes off the northern Chilean coast have followed a magnitude 6.7 temblor that struck March 16 near Iquique.
“The big question is – is this magnitude 8.1 earthquake the 'big one' that we have been expecting in northern Chile, or is this a foreshock to an even bigger earthquake to come?" said Cornell University structural geologist Rick Allmendinger, who returned recently from studies at the Catholic University of the North in Antofogasta, Chile.
“As big as an 8.1 is, it probably has not released all of the stored up energy on the subduction earthquake fault in northern Chile. For the sake of all of our friends in the region, we’re hoping that there isn’t a bigger one still to come.”


http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-chile-earthquake-tsunami-20140401,0,7630963.story#ixzz2xh0paBMb
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Tue 1 Apr, 2014 09:43 pm
The Guardian is doing live updates: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/02/tsunami-warning-for-chile-sparks-evacuation-live-updates

I noticed they said that mining businesses said no damage, or words to that effect.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 1 Apr, 2014 10:00 pm
@Butrflynet,
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usc000nzvd#summary



The April 1 earthquake occurred in a region of historic seismic quiescence – termed the northern Chile or Iquique seismic gap. Historical records indicate a M 8.8 earthquake occurred within the Iquique gap in 1877, which was preceded immediately to the north by an M 8.8 earthquake in 1868.


A recent increase in seismicity rates has occurred in the vicinity of the April 1 earthquake. An M6.7 earthquake with similar faulting mechanism occurred on March 16, 2014 and was followed by 60+ earthquake of M4+, and 26 earthquakes of M5+. The March 16 earthquake was also followed by three M6.2 events on March 17, March 22, and March 23. The spatial distribution of seismicity following the March 16 event migrated spatially to the north through time, starting near 20oS and moving to ~19.5oS. The initial location of the April 1 earthquake places the event near the northern end of this seismic sequence. Other recent large plate boundary ruptures bound the possible rupture area of the April 1 event, including the 2001 M 8.4 Peru earthquake adjacent to the south coast of Peru to the north, and the 2007 M 7.7 Tocopilla, Chile and 1995 M 8.1 Antofagasta, Chile earthquakes to the south. Other nearby events along the plate boundary interface include an M 7.4 in 1967 as well as an M 7.7 in 2005 in the deeper portion of the subduction zone beneath inland Chile.


Seismotectonics of South America (Nazca Plate Region)

The South American arc extends over 7,000 km, from the Chilean margin triple junction offshore of southern Chile to its intersection with the Panama fracture zone, offshore of the southern coast of Panama in Central America. It marks the plate boundary between the subducting Nazca plate and the South America plate, where the oceanic crust and lithosphere of the Nazca plate begin their descent into the mantle beneath South America. The convergence associated with this subduction process is responsible for the uplift of the Andes Mountains, and for the active volcanic chain present along much of this deformation front. Relative to a fixed South America plate, the Nazca plate moves slightly north of eastwards at a rate varying from approximately 80 mm/yr in the south to approximately 65 mm/yr in the north. Although the rate of subduction varies little along the entire arc, there are complex changes in the geologic processes along the subduction zone that dramatically influence volcanic activity, crustal deformation, earthquake generation and occurrence all along the western edge of South America.

Most of the large earthquakes in South America are constrained to shallow depths of 0 to 70 km resulting from both crustal and interplate deformation. Crustal earthquakes result from deformation and mountain building in the overriding South America plate and generate earthquakes as deep as approximately 50 km. Interplate earthquakes occur due to slip along the dipping interface between the Nazca and the South American plates. Interplate earthquakes in this region are frequent and often large, and occur between the depths of approximately 10 and 60 km. Since 1900, numerous magnitude 8 or larger earthquakes have occurred on this subduction zone interface that were followed by devastating tsunamis, including the 1960 M9.5 earthquake in southern Chile, the largest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the world. Other notable shallow tsunami-generating earthquakes include the 1906 M8.5 earthquake near Esmeraldas, Ecuador, the 1922 M8.5 earthquake near Coquimbo, Chile, the 2001 M8.4 Arequipa, Peru earthquake, the 2007 M8.0 earthquake near Pisco, Peru, and the 2010 M8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake located just north of the 1960 event.

Large intermediate-depth earthquakes (those occurring between depths of approximately 70 and 300 km) are relatively limited in size and spatial extent in South America, and occur within the Nazca plate as a result of internal deformation within the subducting plate. These earthquakes generally cluster beneath northern Chile and southwestern Bolivia, and to a lesser extent beneath northern Peru and southern Ecuador, with depths between 110 and 130 km. Most of these earthquakes occur adjacent to the bend in the coastline between Peru and Chile. The most recent large intermediate-depth earthquake in this region was the 2005 M7.8 Tarapaca, Chile earthquake.

Earthquakes can also be generated to depths greater than 600 km as a result of continued internal deformation of the subducting Nazca plate. Deep-focus earthquakes in South America are not observed from a depth range of approximately 300 to 500 km. Instead, deep earthquakes in this region occur at depths of 500 to 650 km and are concentrated into two zones: one that runs beneath the Peru-Brazil border and another that extends from central Bolivia to central Argentina. These earthquakes generally do not exhibit large magnitudes. An exception to this was the 1994 Bolivian earthquake in northwestern Bolivia. This M8.2 earthquake occurred at a depth of 631 km, which was until recently the largest deep-focus earthquake instrumentally recorded (superseded in May 2013 by a M8.3 earthquake 610 km beneath the Sea of Okhotsk, Russia), and was felt widely throughout South and North America.

Subduction of the Nazca plate is geometrically complex and impacts the geology and seismicity of the western edge of South America. The intermediate-depth regions of the subducting Nazca plate can be segmented into five sections based on their angle of subduction beneath the South America plate. Three segments are characterized by steeply dipping subduction; the other two by near-horizontal subduction. The Nazca plate beneath northern Ecuador, southern Peru to northern Chile, and southern Chile descend into the mantle at angles of 25° to 30°. In contrast, the slab beneath southern Ecuador to central Peru, and under central Chile, is subducting at a shallow angle of approximately 10° or less. In these regions of “flat-slab” subduction, the Nazca plate moves horizontally for several hundred kilometers before continuing its descent into the mantle, and is shadowed by an extended zone of crustal seismicity in the overlying South America plate. Although the South America plate exhibits a chain of active volcanism resulting from the subduction and partial melting of the Nazca oceanic lithosphere along most of the arc, these regions of inferred shallow subduction correlate with an absence of volcanic activity.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 1 Apr, 2014 10:05 pm
@Butrflynet,
000
WEHW40 PHEB 020346
TSUHWX
HIZ001>003-005>009-012>014-016>021-023>026-020546-
/O.CAN.PHEB.TS.Y.0001.000000T0000Z-000000T0000Z/
/O.NEW.PHEB.TS.Y.0001.140402T0345Z-000000T0000Z/

TSUNAMI MESSAGE NUMBER 6
NWS PACIFIC TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER EWA BEACH HI
546 PM HST TUE APR 01 2014

TO - CIVIL DEFENSE IN THE STATE OF HAWAII

SUBJECT - TSUNAMI ADVISORY

A TSUNAMI ADVISORY IS ISSUED FOR THE STATE OF HAWAII EFFECTIVE
AT 0545 PM HST.

AN EARTHQUAKE HAS OCCURRED WITH THESE PRELIMINARY PARAMETERS

ORIGIN TIME - 0147 PM HST 01 APR 2014
COORDINATES - 19.8 SOUTH 70.8 WEST
LOCATION - OFF THE COAST OF NORTHERN CHILE
MAGNITUDE - 8.2 MOMENT

MEASUREMENTS OR REPORTS OF TSUNAMI WAVE ACTIVITY

GAUGE LOCATION LAT LON TIME AMPL PER
------------------- ----- ------ ----- --------------- -----
JUAN FERNANDEZ 33.6S 78.8W 0215Z 0.16M / 0.5FT 36MIN
SAN FELIX CL 26.3S 80.1W 0137Z 0.68M / 2.2FT 06MIN
COQUIMBO CL 30.0S 71.3W 0138Z 0.15M / 0.5FT 34MIN
CALDERA CL 27.1S 70.8W 0102Z 0.11M / 0.4FT 30MIN
CHANARAL CL 26.4S 70.6W 0133Z 0.24M / 0.8FT 28MIN
CALLAO LA-PUNTA PE 12.1S 77.2W 0158Z 0.12M / 0.4FT 38MIN
ARICA CL 18.5S 70.3W 0116Z 1.83M / 6.0FT 18MIN
MATARANI PE 17.0S 72.1W 0127Z 0.58M / 1.9FT 08MIN
PAPOSO CL 25.0S 70.5W 0125Z 0.26M / 0.9FT 22MIN
PISAGUA CL 19.6S 70.2W 0055Z 2.01M / 6.6FT 12MIN
MEJILLONES CL 23.1S 70.5W 0103Z 0.86M / 2.8FT 34MIN
TOCOPILLA CL 22.1S 70.2W 0109Z 0.42M / 1.4FT 10MIN
DART 32402 26.7S 74.0W 0044Z 0.05M / 0.2FT 44MIN
ANTOFAGASTA CL 23.7S 70.4W 0034Z 0.25M / 0.8FT 18MIN
PATACHE CL 20.8S 70.2W 0015Z 1.51M / 5.0FT 10MIN
IQUIQUE CL 20.2S 70.1W 0005Z 2.11M / 6.9FT 12MIN

LAT - LATITUDE (N-NORTH, S-SOUTH)
LON - LONGITUDE (E-EAST, W-WEST)
TIME - TIME OF THE MEASUREMENT (Z IS UTC IS GREENWICH TIME)
AMPL - TSUNAMI AMPLITUDE MEASURED RELATIVE TO NORMAL SEA LEVEL.
IT IS ...NOT... CREST-TO-TROUGH WAVE HEIGHT.
VALUES ARE GIVEN IN BOTH METERS(M) AND FEET(FT).
PER - PERIOD OF TIME IN MINUTES(MIN) FROM ONE WAVE TO THE NEXT.

NOTE - DART MEASUREMENTS ARE FROM THE DEEP OCEAN AND THEY
ARE GENERALLY MUCH SMALLER THAN WOULD BE COASTAL
MEASUREMENTS AT SIMILAR LOCATIONS.

EVALUATION

BASED ON ALL AVAILABLE DATA A MAJOR TSUNAMI IS NOT EXPECTED TO
STRIKE THE STATE OF HAWAII. HOWEVER...SEA LEVEL CHANGES AND
STRONG CURRENTS MAY OCCUR ALONG ALL COASTS THAT COULD BE A HAZARD
TO SWIMMERS AND BOATERS AS WELL AS TO PERSONS NEAR THE SHORE AT
BEACHES AND IN HARBORS AND MARINAS. THE THREAT MAY CONTINUE FOR
SEVERAL HOURS AFTER THE INITIAL WAVE ARRIVAL.

THE ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL OF THE INITIAL WAVE IS

0324 AM HST WED 02 APR 2014

FURTHER MESSAGES WILL BE ISSUED HOURLY OR SOONER AS CONDITIONS
WARRANT UNTIL THE THREAT TO HAWAII HAS PASSED.
 

Related Topics

did the earth move for you? - Discussion by ehBeth
Big quake in Haiti - Discussion by sozobe
7.9 Quake in Nepal - Discussion by Butrflynet
7.5 Major Quake - Guerrero, Mexico - Discussion by Butrflynet
Quake on Canada's East Coast - Question by Butrflynet
Myanmar - Earthquake - Question by ehBeth
7.5 Quake in Indian Ocean - Discussion by Butrflynet
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 11:07:46