30
   

Quake activity along the San Andreas fault is picking up

 
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Mon 19 Apr, 2010 12:20 pm
Interesting (long) article for reading in your leisure time:

http://247wallst.com/2010/04/19/the-390-billion-san-francisco-earthquake/

Excerpts:
Quote:

The $390 Billion San Francisco Earthquake

Posted: April 19, 2010 at 4:10 am


According to United States Geological Survey, there is a 50% chance or better of an earthquake measuring 7 or greater on the Richter scale hitting San Francisco in the next 75 years. Based on 24/7 Wall St.’s analysis of data and reports produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, USGS, Stanford University, insurance consultant RMS, and a number of other sources, we determined that the costs of an earthquake in San Francisco measuring the same size and hitting the site of the famous 1906 disaster would reach $390 billion. That is nearly 25% of the U.S. government’s deficit for the current fiscal year.



Quote:
CONSIDERED DAMAGES:

RMS estimates that the value of exposed property in the area prone to a major quake is nearly $2 trillion dollars. City planners recognize the potential disaster that may be looming, and have taken as many steps as possible to protect buildings, residences and infrastructure. While the city tries to become more earthquake-resistant, some particularly vulnerable areas remain. Among these is the wharf development along the city’s water front, which was built on landfill and older structures. Through a process known as liquefaction, in which soft ground turns to something similar to quicksand, much of the coastal area of the city would sink into the ground or collapse into the bay.

It is certain that an earthquake similar to the massive quake in ’06 would do substantial damage to the city’s four main bridges: The Golden Gate, Oakland Bay, San Mateo-Heyward, and Dumbarton bridges, as well as the thousands of smaller spans in the region. Two of the region’s three main airports " Oakland International and San Francisco international, have been built largely on land deposits, and are particularly vulnerable to liquefaction. The freshwater basin, which abuts the bay, is built with a series of levees that separate the salt water from the fresh. In all likelihood, these levees would be breached and the region would lose much of its fresh water. The main conduit for the fresh water, called the Hetch Hetchy water system, runs from Yosemite national park and crosses multiple fault lines, making its destruction nearly certain as well. Perhaps the most expensive and problematic type of infrastructure at risk of destruction is the city’s utility network, which includes the power grid, telephone lines, sewer system, and broadband connections to almost every residence and office building in the 19-county region. Other potential losses in a quake include business opportunity costs from closed offices and reduced patronage and tourism, relocation expenses, and wage losses.


Quote:
CONCLUSION: The total costs of a 7.9 earthquake occurring in the center of San Francisco are $390 billion: $150 billion for property damage, business interruption, and relocation costs; $90 billion in government aid expenditure; $60 billion to rebuild the region’s bridges; $20 billion to reconstruct the airports; $40 billion to repair the levee and reservoir system; $30 billion for replacing the utility grid.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Mon 26 Apr, 2010 05:18 pm
3.5 Ml - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 3.5 Ml
Date-Time

* 26 Apr 2010 20:14:58 UTC
* 26 Apr 2010 13:14:58 near epicenter
* 26 Apr 2010 12:14:58 standard time in your timezone

Location 36.573N 120.366W
Depth 9 km
Distances

* 9 km (5 miles) NNW (329 degrees) of Cantua Creek, CA
* 13 km (8 miles) SW (231 degrees) of Tranquillity, CA
* 16 km (10 miles) WSW (256 degrees) of San Joaquin, CA
* 48 km (30 miles) N (359 degrees) of Coalinga, CA
* 160 km (100 miles) ESE (122 degrees) of San Jose City Hall, CA

---------------------------

3.2 Ml - NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 3.2 Ml
Date-Time

* 26 Apr 2010 03:44:09 UTC
* 25 Apr 2010 20:44:09 near epicenter
* 25 Apr 2010 19:44:09 standard time in your timezone

Location 38.792N 122.766W
Depth 2 km
Distances

* 4 km (2 miles) ESE (102 degrees) of The Geysers, CA
* 6 km (4 miles) SW (218 degrees) of Cobb, CA
* 7 km (4 miles) WNW (286 degrees) of Anderson Springs, CA
* 39 km (24 miles) N (352 degrees) of Santa Rosa, CA
* 116 km (72 miles) WNW (284 degrees) of Sacramento, CA
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 27 Apr, 2010 07:23 pm
Lots of little (under 2.5) quakes in the Bay Area today...



Magnitude 3.1 - NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
2010 April 27 23:07:21 UTC

Earthquake Details
Magnitude 3.1
Date-Time

* Tuesday, April 27, 2010 at 23:07:21 UTC
* Tuesday, April 27, 2010 at 04:07:21 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 38.810°N, 122.801°W
Depth 0.1 km (~0.1 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Distances

* 1 km (1 miles) NNE (19°) from The Geysers, CA
* 7 km (5 miles) WSW (248°) from Cobb, CA
* 10 km (6 miles) WNW (293°) from Anderson Springs, CA
* 19 km (12 miles) E (86°) from Cloverdale, CA
* 41 km (26 miles) NNW (348°) from Santa Rosa, CA
* 119 km (74 miles) WNW (284°) from Sacramento, CA

-----------------------

0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sun 2 May, 2010 06:36 pm
3.3 Ml - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 3.3 Ml
Date-Time

* 2 May 2010 17:37:00 UTC
* 2 May 2010 10:37:00 near epicenter
* 2 May 2010 09:37:00 standard time in your timezone

Location 36.580N 120.372W
Depth 8 km
Distances

* 10 km (6 miles) NNW (329 degrees) of Cantua Creek, CA
* 13 km (8 miles) SW (235 degrees) of Tranquillity, CA
* 16 km (10 miles) W (259 degrees) of San Joaquin, CA
* 49 km (30 miles) N (359 degrees) of Coalinga, CA
* 159 km (99 miles) ESE (122 degrees) of San Jose City Hall, CA
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 4 May, 2010 01:25 pm
Mt. Lassen, the sleeping giant, is stirring in her sleep.

Looks like they had a mini swarm of small quakes on the 1st there. There was a swarm of over 100 small quakes in that area in the month of March and nearly just as many in January.

It is a rich geothermal area, with mud pots and vents, but overall it has been very quiet for a long time. It erupted sometime back around 1915.

Here's more info on the Cascadia subduction zone which includes Mt. Lassen, Mt. St. Helens, Shasta and about a dozen others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_subduction_zone

2.8 Mcd - LASSEN PEAK AREA, CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 2.8 Mcd
Date-Time

* 1 May 2010 18:42:34 UTC
* 1 May 2010 11:42:34 near epicenter
* 1 May 2010 10:42:34 standard time in your timezone

Location 40.463N 121.549W
Depth 4 km
Distances

* 12 km (8 miles) ESE (120 degrees) of Viola, CA
* 12 km (8 miles) N (7 degrees) of Mineral, CA
* 27 km (17 miles) E (80 degrees) of Manton, CA
* 71 km (44 miles) E (100 degrees) of Redding, CA
* 212 km (132 miles) N (358 degrees) of Sacramento, CA

--------------------------------------

Interesting description of the geology in the area from a Sierra College field trip to Mt. Lassen about 15 years ago:

http://www.sierracollege.edu/museum/fieldtrips/ft-mtlassen.htm
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Thu 6 May, 2010 06:38 pm
Magnitude 4.5 - VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION
2010 May 06 23:12:33 UTC

Earthquake Details
Magnitude 4.5
Date-Time

* Thursday, May 06, 2010 at 23:12:33 UTC
* Thursday, May 06, 2010 at 04:12:33 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 48.326°N, 127.847°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION
Distances

* 239 km (148 miles) W (270°) from Neah Bay, WA
* 260 km (162 miles) W (281°) from Forks, WA
* 263 km (164 miles) S (186°) from Port Hardy, BC, Canada
* 329 km (205 miles) W (269°) from Saanich, British Columbia, Canada
* 361 km (224 miles) WSW (255°) from Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sat 8 May, 2010 04:46 pm
Magnitude 4.3 - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
2010 May 08 19:23:06 UTC

Earthquake Details
Magnitude 4.3
Date-Time

* Saturday, May 08, 2010 at 19:23:06 UTC
* Saturday, May 08, 2010 at 12:23:06 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 35.021°N, 119.253°W
Depth 13.7 km (8.5 miles)
Region CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Distances

* 14 km (9 miles) ESE (107°) from Maricopa, CA
* 21 km (13 miles) NNW (336°) from Pine Mountain Club, CA
* 21 km (13 miles) SE (124°) from Taft, CA
* 41 km (25 miles) SW (229°) from Lamont, CA
* 42 km (26 miles) SSW (208°) from Bakersfield, CA
* 142 km (88 miles) NW (320°) from Los Angeles Civic Center, CA
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Sat 8 May, 2010 07:18 pm
We had yet another one, and felt it too!
http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/5092/picture1uy.png

0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sun 9 May, 2010 05:42 am

Earthquakes delay coastal trains

By Michele Clock, UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

Saturday, May 8, 2010 at 2:43 p.m.

The 4.8 and 4.7-magnitude earthquakes that shook the region Saturday morning have caused some train delays on the Coaster and Amtrak lines between Oceanside and San Diego.

The quakes, which struck at 11:33 a.m. and 11:46 a.m., halted a Coaster train for nearly an hour and a half as it headed south from the Solana Beach station. Two Amtrak trains on the tracks through North County were delayed up to an hour and 21 minutes.

Amtrak spokesman Marc Magliari said two more trains on the Pacific Surfliner route were expected to be delayed during the afternoon, but that train service should return to a normal schedule by the end of Saturday.

Service on the Coaster had returned to normal by about 1:15 p.m.

No damage was reported along the rail line between San Diego and the Orange County line, according to a spokesman for the North County Transit District. The district owns the lines and runs the Coaster.

The San Diego Trolley was unaffected by the earthquakes, said Metropolitan Transit System spokesman Rob Schupp.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Thu 13 May, 2010 01:47 am
5.1 Mb - OFF COAST OF OREGON
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 5.1 Mb
Date-Time

* 13 May 2010 05:35:11 UTC
* 12 May 2010 21:35:11 near epicenter
* 12 May 2010 21:35:11 standard time in your timezone

Location 42.182N 126.474W
Depth 9 km
Distances

* 171 km (106 miles) W (262 degrees) of Gold Beach, OR
* 174 km (108 miles) WSW (249 degrees) of Port Orford, OR
* 181 km (112 miles) W (275 degrees) of Brookings, OR
* 194 km (120 miles) WNW (285 degrees) of Crescent City, CA
* 482 km (300 miles) SW (221 degrees) of Portland, OR
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Fri 14 May, 2010 12:33 pm
Very interesting page about the San Andreas Fault Trail. These are just some of the images from the trail. See more at the link. Be sure to click the various tabs on the site for more info and images.

This is an interesting observation about the Loma Prieta quake and the period of activity before it occurred in 1989. I think it is very similar to what I'm seeing in two spots along the SA fault.

Quote:
In 2005, Berkeley lab geophysicist Valeri Korneev identified some seismic data that seem to correspond to the Loma Prieta earthquake. Searching through records of seismic activity that occurred in the two months before the October 17, 1989 quake, Korneev noticed an increase in the number of small-magnitude tremors about eight times above normal levels. This activity was followed by a period of relative calm in the crust around the quake’s epicenter. Perhaps this rise and decline of activity in the crust surrounding a fault could help scientists predict the location and date of large, potentially destructive temblors.



http://www.kqed.org/quest/exploration/san-andreas-fault-trail-exploration#Overview

Quote:
Most Bay Area residents have felt the earth move"quite literally. You probably know that the San Andreas Fault runs nearly the length of the state. But did you know that you can see the fault for yourself?

As you follow the lines of posts that mark the various fault breaks in the Los Trancos Open Space Preserve, you can find out what's happening when you feel that temblor underfoot. You may be surprised to see some of the effects of earthquakes in this otherwise tranquil Santa Cruz Mountain spot.



http://farm1.static.flickr.com/148/355246644_23b4258a95_m.jpg

Quote:
Standing on the Pacific Plate, you see Black Mountain (left) Mount Umunhum (center) and Loma Prieta (just right) on the North American plate. Two million years ago, boulders shifted from Loma Prieta to the Pacific plate, and moved northward inch by inch for 23 miles.


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/134/355247789_c290ad8e7d_m.jpg

Quote:
In the woods you'll see more evidence of earthquake activity. This is a reproduction of a fence line that moved five to seven feet during the 1906 earthquake. In Point Reyes, the land slipped over twice as far because it was closer to the quake's epicenter.


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/149/355248333_93775cf8d2_m.jpg

Quote:
Trees grow upward, unless something happens to knock them over. The lower part of this trunk dates from the late nineteenth century, while the vertical section dates from the early twentieth century. Apparently, the 1906 earthquake knocked the tree over, and the branches then became the new main trunks.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sat 15 May, 2010 07:02 pm
3.3 Ml - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CALIF.
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 3.3 Ml
Date-Time

* 15 May 2010 17:54:42 UTC
* 15 May 2010 10:54:42 near epicenter
* 15 May 2010 09:54:42 standard time in your timezone

Location 37.701N 121.998W
Depth 11 km
Distances

* 6 km (3 miles) ENE (62 degrees) of Fairview, CA
* 7 km (4 miles) E (92 degrees) of Castro Valley, CA
* 7 km (5 miles) SSW (213 degrees) of San Ramon, CA
* 9 km (6 miles) NE (47 degrees) of Hayward, CA
* 38 km (24 miles) ESE (102 degrees) of San Francisco City Hall, CA
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 18 May, 2010 04:07 pm
Interesting interview with retired University of Washington seismologist, Steve Malone, about volcanoes and earthquakes.

Here are some excerpts I found intriguing. First, here's the definition of a term used frequently in the interview:


Episodic Tremor and Slip (ETS)

Episodic Tremor and Slip (ETS) is the name given to a process that occurs deep below the Earth's surface, along faults that form the boundaries of tectonic plates. It involves repeated episodes of slow sliding, one plate over the other, of a few centimetres over a period of several weeks, accompanied by energetic seismic noise, called tremor. Tremor is distinctly different from the seismic signals generated by earthquakes.


http://thesunbreak.com/2010/05/13/the-northwest-is-earthquake-country-everywhere-you-look


...
As it turned out, we ended up talking across the breadth of Malone's career, covering volcanic earthquakes, megathrust quakes, and the mysterious Episodic Tremor and Slip (ETS). His interest in seismology developed in graduate school; he'd studied physics as undergraduate, but was not "keen on modern physics" and gravitated toward geology, then seismology. At first he enjoyed the outdoors aspects of the work, "particularly in the volcano world," but as his research progressed, he ended up in the office running computer models.

...

"The ETS we have here are fairly regular, every 14 and a half months or so. The next one is scheduled--if you can call it that--for sometime mid-summer, maybe mid-August. We've got some experiments we're planning to gear up and get extra equipment in the ground for. There's some extra equipment out there now, running in background mode, but when the ETS arrives we'll double the equipment, trying to look ever closer at it."

...

"Whether earthquakes are due to these large-scale tectonic forces, plate motions, or whether they're due to magma rising within the crust, it's rock breaking," emphasized Malone. "They look a little different on volcanoes, and usually you don't have such big earthquakes--the faults, or weaknesses, are concentrated in the volcano itself, but in a few cases you can get moderate-sized earthquakes." It's the why of the rock-breaking that provides material for a lifetime of study.

As a student of Pacific Northwest volcanic history, he rolled his eyes a little at Iceland's Eyjafjallajokull volcano. "Oceanic volcanoes are going off all the time, and Iceland is nothing more than an oceanic volcano which happens to be where the ocean is very shallow, like, non-existent. But it's part of the oceanic rift system, which goes down through the Atlantic, more or less in the middle. We have one off our coast here, called the Juan de Fuca Ridge, 400 or 500 kilometers off our coast, same thing: There's eruptions going on out there fairly frequently."

For Malone, the big tectonophysics excitement centers on sneaky episodes of tremor and slip (ETS), which have only been discovered in the last ten years or so: "The slip is slow, it takes place over the course of days to weeks, rather than an earthquake. An earthquake takes place over the course of seconds, tens of seconds, maybe a few minutes for the really biggest." Besides deformation in the ground, measurable via GPS, seismographic listening devices pick up an accompanying tremor that has scientists puzzled. What they do know is that slow or not, something major is going on.

The instances of ETS that the Pacific Northwest sees are mostly thanks to a major oceanic plate, the Juan de Fuca Plate, subducting under North America. Except, as Malone put it, "It's stuck. It's stuck along the Cascadia Fault Zone, which is just off our coast. Suddenly it's going to let loose, and that's when you get these megathrust earthquakes, magnitude 8 to 9 events." In the meantime, if you put out GPS instruments around western Washington, you can watch them move toward the east or northeast--those on the coast more than inland, Malone told me, as the earth is compressed in the collision between plates.

But approximately every 14 months, your instruments will move back toward the ocean. "Maybe over the course of 14 months it moves four-and-a-half centimeters toward the northeast, but then it moves back again four or five millimeters over the course of a couple weeks," said Malone.

What fascinates seismologists is that this kind of ETS event, in its slow-motion way, unleashes energy equivalent to a 6.5 magnitude quake or greater. It just does it with such nuance that no one noticed until recently. "During the height of one of these ETS events, you may have tremor going on for 24 hours a day," Malone said. "It's probably been going on for decades, centuries, but it's only in the last decade, since about 1999, where it was for seen in Japan and reported in the literature, that we started looking for it here" (because of our subduction zone quirks*).

...

Capturing the slow movements of ETS requires the use of geodetic stations, which use GPS to measure the distances between stations to within a few millimeters over hundreds of kilometers. The University of Washington partners with Central Washington University for this part. "You put them in the ground and fix them in really solid so they're only going to move when that part of the earth moves," said Malone. "Then you remeasure them over months to many years, and you see deformation. You see the earth actually changing shape, at least that part." For the upcoming ETS experience in August, Malone and his cohorts at Pacific Northwest Seismic Network are setting up what they call an Array of Arrays.

Malone taking a measurement from a portable GPS device.

Currently they have 80 instruments (eight arrays with ten stations per array) placed over a one-kiometer area, which yields "pretty good" resolution of the tremor waves. But they plan to double their listening resolution to 20 stations this time around. The portable devices are about the size of a large beer can, Malone told me. "You can carry half dozen in your backpack." They're placed mostly on forest service land or private timber company land. While the ideal is flat topography, the researchers also have to avoid human habitation, which comes with all sorts of earth-shaking impacts of its own.

...

"We don't know whether the ETS is taking away some of the energy build-up, or maybe it's just concentrating it in a different place. Maybe you're more likely to have a quake during an ETS period. But at the same time, earthquakes on the subduction zone will rip the whole thing, from northern California to southern British Columbia. And we only see the ETS-- the one we're looking at anyway--in this part."

There are, in fact, other ETS events in Oregon and into northern California, but, Malone said, they seem to have a different schedule. "They don't occur at the same time as ours, and their regularity may be different. It may be 11 months, or 22 months. If you look around, someplace on the subduction zone one of these ETS is going on at least half the time, if not more. So who's to say it's not the one in California that could trigger the megathrust earthquake, as opposed to ours."

One of the reasons he's fascinated by ETS, admitted Malone, is that he has seen seismic signals on volcanoes that are very similar to ETS. "It's called volcanic tremor, and it's a more or less continuous, low-level shaking that has to do with the motion of fluids within the volcano: maybe magma, maybe water, maybe steam, maybe gases. So the generation of tremor in volcanoes may be able to give us a clue or a hint. They're really different--sometimes we call this non-volcanic tremor, but maybe there's something about the mechanism that has similarities to volcanoes…."

...

"What we think ETS represents is actual slip on part of the locked zone," he said. "It's stuck, but some place between the seriously stuck part and that part which is much deeper, which is always slipping a little bit, somewhere in there, there must be a transition zone. And this transition zone is stuck a lot of the time, but then for a few weeks it slides, or at least part of it slides. That is the slow slip. It doesn't take place like an earthquake--it doesn't take place rapidly, KABOOM! It takes place over a period of many days, maybe as much as three weeks.

...

Right now, you can watch for ETS online, at PNSN's interactive tremor map, http://www.pnsn.org/tremor/ and I can also recommend their Recent Quakes page http://www.pnsn.org/recenteqs/latest.htm. But don't let the slow-motion stuff fool you. Big and small shakes are a way of life in the Northwest. Each year, over 1000 earthquakes with magnitude 1.0 or greater occur in Washington and Oregon, says PNSN's site, which also shares this mind-bending factoid:

Vertical motion on the Seattle Fault and faults just to the north have caused the block of earth between faults H and I on the map to drop a total of more than 12,000 feet in the last 40 million years.

...

"There are some curiosities because there have been tremor bursts or periods of it--though it's still not well documented--in Alaska. In Alaska, it's the Pacific plate descending that is pretty old, not as old as in Japan, but still way older than here. Tremor has also been seen on the San Andreas Fault, but it's very difficult to spot there--it's quite weak and rare in comparison to these warm subduction zones. It's taking place in only a few places that people have been able to detect it…barely: the central part of the San Andreas Fault, central California, an area called Parkfield. Even there it's not occurring on the breaking part of the San Andreas, it's occurring on the part of the San Andreas that's really down deep, where it's warmer. The earthquakes themselves don't propagate that deep, but there must be some slippage going on, something between totally brittle and ductile deformation."
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 18 May, 2010 07:32 pm
Ok, let's see how long it takes Calamity Jane to come tell us she felt this one!

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqscanv/FaultMaps/116-33.gif

Magnitude 5.1 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
2010 May 19 00:38:59 UTC

Earthquake Details
Magnitude 5.1
Date-Time

* Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 00:38:59 UTC
* Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at 05:38:59 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 32.653°N, 115.832°W
Depth 10.1 km (6.3 miles)
Region SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Distances

* 18 km (11 miles) ESE (122°) from Ocotillo, CA
* 20 km (13 miles) SW (221°) from Seeley, CA
* 30 km (18 miles) WSW (240°) from El Centro, CA
* 34 km (21 miles) W (270°) from Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
* 112 km (70 miles) E (83°) from Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 18 May, 2010 07:36 pm
@Butrflynet,
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/05/50-earthquake-hits-california-border-area.html

L.A. NOW
Southern California -- this just in


5.1 earthquake hits California border area [Updated]
May 18, 2010 | 5:57 pm

An earthquake estimated at magnitude 5.1 struck the California-Mexico border Tuesday afternoon, apparently another sharp aftershock from the 7.2 Mexicali temblor last month.

The new quake was reported at 5:38 p.m. 19 miles southwest of Calexico in Imperial County. There were no immediate reports of injuries or damage, but the quake was felt across the border region.

The April 4 earthquake killed two people in Mexicali and caused significant damage there. But Calexico in Imperial County was also hard-hit. It caused at least $91 million in damage in California alone.

President Obama on Friday signed a federal disaster declaration for the Calexico area.

The move makes areas with quake damage eligible for federal funding, including government agencies and nonprofit groups.

[Updated, 6:05 p.m.: Hundreds of people reported feeling the quake to the U.S. Geological Service. Many of the reports came from Imperial and San Diego counties, but residents in Irvine, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Corona and other areas also reported shaking.

A spokeswoman for the Imperial County Sheriff's Department told the Associated Press that the temblor was felt but there were no reports of damage.]
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Thu 20 May, 2010 08:34 am
3.0 Ml - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 3.0 Ml
Date-Time

* 20 May 2010 12:44:51 UTC
* 20 May 2010 05:44:51 near epicenter
* 20 May 2010 04:44:51 standard time in your timezone

Location 36.843N 121.576W
Depth 4 km
Distances

* 3 km (2 miles) W (267 degrees) of San Juan Bautista, CA
* 8 km (5 miles) SE (130 degrees) of Aromas, CA
* 9 km (6 miles) ENE (60 degrees) of Prunedale, CA
* 16 km (10 miles) W (268 degrees) of Hollister, CA
* 62 km (38 miles) SSE (153 degrees) of San Jose City Hall, CA
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Thu 20 May, 2010 06:08 pm
Magnitude 3.4 - OFF THE COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
2010 May 20 23:05:19 UTC

Earthquake Details
Magnitude 3.4
Date-Time

* Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 23:05:19 UTC
* Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 04:05:19 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 40.413°N, 125.966°W
Depth 23.9 km (14.9 miles)
Region OFF THE COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Distances

* 143 km (89 miles) W (274°) from Petrolia, CA
* 145 km (90 miles) W (263°) from Ferndale, CA
* 153 km (95 miles) WSW (257°) from Humboldt Hill, CA
* 158 km (98 miles) WSW (255°) from Eureka, CA
* 424 km (263 miles) NW (315°) from San Francisco City Hall, CA
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Fri 21 May, 2010 03:26 pm
3.0 Mcd - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 3.0 Mcd
Date-Time

* 21 May 2010 18:03:48 UTC
* 21 May 2010 11:03:48 near epicenter
* 21 May 2010 10:03:48 standard time in your timezone

Location 37.818N 118.971W
Depth 3 km
Distances

* 20 km (12 miles) N (2 degrees) of Mammoth Lakes, CA
* 20 km (13 miles) SE (140 degrees) of Lee Vining, CA
* 38 km (24 miles) NW (318 degrees) of Toms Place, CA
* 233 km (145 miles) ESE (110 degrees) of Sacramento, CA
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sat 22 May, 2010 12:06 pm
3.2 Ml - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 3.2 Ml
Date-Time

* 22 May 2010 17:06:07 UTC
* 22 May 2010 10:06:07 near epicenter
* 22 May 2010 09:06:07 standard time in your timezone

Location 37.819N 118.974W
Depth 4 km
Distances

* 20 km (12 miles) SE (140 degrees) of Lee Vining, CA
* 20 km (13 miles) N (1 degrees) of Mammoth Lakes, CA
* 39 km (24 miles) NW (318 degrees) of Toms Place, CA
* 233 km (145 miles) ESE (110 degrees) of Sacramento, CA

-----------------

5.3 Ml - BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 5.3 Ml
Date-Time

* 22 May 2010 17:30:57 UTC
* 22 May 2010 10:30:57 near epicenter
* 22 May 2010 09:30:57 standard time in your timezone

Location 32.593N 115.756W
Depth 5 km
Distances

* 23 km (14 miles) SSW (196 degrees) of Seeley, CA
* 26 km (16 miles) SW (234 degrees) of Heber, CA
* 26 km (16 miles) WSW (249 degrees) of Calexico, CA
* 28 km (17 miles) WSW (256 degrees) of Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
* 119 km (74 miles) E (86 degrees) of Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sun 23 May, 2010 09:37 am
3.1 Ml - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
Preliminary Earthquake Report Magnitude 3.1 Ml
Date-Time

* 23 May 2010 04:45:44 UTC
* 22 May 2010 21:45:44 near epicenter
* 22 May 2010 20:45:44 standard time in your timezone

Location 37.817N 118.970W
Depth 3 km
Distances

* 20 km (12 miles) N (2 degrees) of Mammoth Lakes, CA
* 21 km (13 miles) SE (140 degrees) of Lee Vining, CA
* 38 km (24 miles) NW (318 degrees) of Toms Place, CA
* 233 km (145 miles) ESE (110 degrees) of Sacramento, CA
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

did the earth move for you? - Discussion by ehBeth
Big quake in Haiti - Discussion by sozobe
7.9 Quake in Nepal - Discussion by Butrflynet
7.5 Major Quake - Guerrero, Mexico - Discussion by Butrflynet
Quake on Canada's East Coast - Question by Butrflynet
Myanmar - Earthquake - Question by ehBeth
7.5 Quake in Indian Ocean - Discussion by Butrflynet
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 09:03:30