0123456789 (numerology origins)

Forums: Numerology, Number Origins, Arabic Numbers
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Who came up with this type of numbering system?

I have heard it called Arabic and I have also heard that it was in invention of Islam.

Why does the Old Testament Bible recorded long before Islam write of measurements like "four and twenty", seventy times seven etc? These Biblical numeral reckonings seem to be a system based upon ten individual digits.

Numbers 7:88 KJV
And all the oxen for the sacrifice of the peace offerings were twenty and four bullocks, the rams sixty, the he goats sixty, the lambs of the first year sixty. This was the dedication of the altar, after that it was anointed .

Comment: Are these numbers Islamic, Arabic, Persian, Chaldaean (Babylonian) or perhaps they even came from the Hebrew boy Daniel when he was taken into Babylonian captivity. Moses perhaps found them in Egypt? Perhaps the Arabs learned them from the Greeks and the Romans tried to subvert the Gnostic idea of zero? The Roman numerals have no “zero”, or do they?

These very same numbers it seems are recorded in the Bible "long before Islam".

In the beginning God (zero) created the heavens (one) and the earth (two)...

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 3,833 • Replies: 15

No top replies

@RexRed,

The shapes are Arabic. The concept of counting probably predates the Bible.

1 Reply

@jespah,

Quote:

The shapes are Arabic. The concept of counting probably predates the Bible.

Excellent perspective, do you know where the shapes originate specifically?

http://chiotsrun.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/rain-barrel-marks.jpg

http://pro.corbis.com/images/42-17318004.jpg?size=572&uid=%7BD6F258D0-6ABE-4AE4-8767-FEB65139C573%7D

0 Replies

Zero - was 'invented/discovered' by most literate peoples. It comes to us via the Babylonic stream, but was also in MesoAmerican and Chinese and Indian counting systems. The use of decimal is not a given. Early systems used base 60 or base 20.

The numbering system we use is derived from the use of a standard decimal numbering by Arab mathematicians. They in turn had borrowed it from India, so it is Hindi-Arabic.

0 Replies

If you are thinking "Hey, those don't look anything like the numbers I use", you are right. In the ancient world, type was not a 'fixed' idea. Sentences could run left to right then reverse right to left on the next line. Letters frequently 'tipped' over or were streamlined to make it writing faster. If you look at the all the numbers in their 'primitive' form - you can see how they would evolve to a more familiar shape.

1 Reply

@Mr Stillwater,

There's a good elegant simplicity with the digits we use. Except for 5 (and you can do that, too, though many people don't), they're all one-stroke characters. But accounts are some of our earliest known writing. There are Egyptian tablets showing accounts for purchases of things like olive oil but also, sadly, slaves.

Mr. Stillwater, it's interesting that the 6 and the 7 are reversed in some of the examples you showed.

1 Reply

http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2008/01/abacus-1-ajhd.jpg

0 Replies

@jespah,

Quote:

our earliest known writing

It's true. The records that managed to be preserved are usually atypical. They are lists of kings or royal lineages, otherwise they record transactions. Incredibly useful, but lack the human touch (if you know what I mean),

We are really lucky when they are actual correspondence or items related to day-to-day living. When I was running training courses on keeping records I would always try to bring in the personal perspective. A reciept for your credit card, or for rent, or the stuff you include on your resume are intensely personal and say so much about you as a person.

1 Reply

They're only called Arabic numerals because Europeans first encountered them from Arabian sources. They come originally from the Hind . . . the Indian subcontinent.

Trust Rex to construct an entire fantasy castle from this . . . i've never known anyone who raises superstition to such a level . . .

1 Reply

@Mr Stillwater,

That's very true, Mr. S. There's something about finding family receipts from 50 years ago, money spent by people long dead, it can really tell you something about that person.

1 Reply

@jespah,

For real in one of my library jobs. Found a receipt in a book from the 1930s (? I think).
Cost of a Masonic apron? 12 pounds 5 shillings.
Taking over the world? Priceless.

1 Reply

@Mr Stillwater,

When my mother was, I think, about 10 years younger than I currently am, she was going through her mother's personal effects and found an accounting of the costs of her (my mother's, not my grandmother's) wedding, e. g. food (my grandmother did the cooking), rabbi's fee, dress, etc. Very telling.

0 Replies

@Setanta,

Set wrote:

They're only called Arabic numerals because Europeans first encountered them from Arabian sources. [/quote ]

Rex wrote:
I agree.

Set wrote:
They come originally from the Hind . . . the Indian subcontinent.

Rex wrote:
I disagree. I believe India got zero from the Chaldaeans (where India also got their “religion“) and the Chaldaeans possibly got “zero” from Daniel. Set, do you know many words of the ancient Chaldaean language? I do… “In Hebrew and Chaldean the word zera has several meanings referring to the seed of the plant.” Are you saying the English word "zero" does not come from Chaldee?

Set wrote:
Trust Rex to construct an entire fantasy castle from this . . . i've never known anyone who raises superstition to such a level . . .

Rex wrote:
You are entitled to your opinion...

0 Replies

Daniel 5:26 KJV
This is the interpretation of the thing: MENE ; God hath numbered thy kingdom, and finished it.

Comment:
There were twelve tribes of Israel, each tribe stood for a constellation in the zodiac. The zodiac being a circle or zero (seed) in the heavens surrounding the earth.

0 Replies

Also,

Zoroaster, Chaldaen, zoro = zera

Zoroaster (whether predating Abraham or influencing him) entitled himself with the name “the seed of monotheism”; or, as I interpret it, the emissary of zero.

1 Reply

@RexRed,

When we look at the biblical evidence for the lifespans of all three Hebrew patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, we see that:
1. Abraham lived to 175 (5 X 5 X 7) Isaac lived to 180 (6 X 6 X 5) Jacob lived to 147 (7 X 7 X 3) An analysis of these ages shows:
Each lifespan involves a perfect square (5, 6, then 7 in a numeric series),
the third factor also forms a series (7, 5, 3)
and in each case the sum of the factors is 17.
5+5+7=17
6+6+5=17
7+7+3=17

0 Replies

0123456789 (numerology origins)

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know