IQ: The science of intelligence

On any given day, I can take an IQ test that varies 30 or more points from a previous test, though I don't believe I have ever scored below normal. It does give you a rush to score in the genius range, but from a practical point of view, I know that I don't belong there except in perhaps one or two extremely narrowly defined areas.

I know my limitatons of being able to comprehend, embrace, and fully understand certain spatial or technical or mathematical concepts, nor do I have any compelling interest to try to learn to understand such things. In other areas, concepts are effortless and ridiculously easy for me while others whom I perceive to be of equal or superior intelligence to me simply can't seem to grasp them at all.

Perhaps the element of intelligence that IQ tests cannot measure are those unique natural gifts with which each of us are endowed?

Different tests use different scores. I'm a Mensa member (top 2% on any of a number of accepted tests) and there is no one "number" that proves a level of intelligence. Foxfyre, your general intelligence stays the same (approximately) but the scores can vary widely -- sorta like taking your temperature with a Fahrenheit thermometer and a Celsius one. The numbers are way different, but your internal temperature is the same.

Most of the Mensans I meet will admit to one thing only: "We test well!"

I find these points as secondary matters to intelligence, not primary matters, but non the less very importaint.