Some blacks are good

how'd you get so wise Firefly?

I said in my post, the ones who rape, steal, and murder ARE sub human. 17 percent of murders are done by blacks, while they represent 13% of the country. That is MURDER alone. I find it funny on most of your points of my post you choose to ignore the point where I said some blacks are good? Now, as far as the intelligence of our "black" friends.
Take a look at this.
http://www.dushkin.com/connectext/psy/ch08/raceintel.mhtml

Oh, and the Asians are smarter than whites. Go figure. Now, the unemployment rate of our black friends. Well, lets go back to 2003. I have an article talking about New York and the unemployment rate.

Only 51.8% held jobs!
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0DXK/is_13_21/ai_n6169071

I'm sorry, I was wrong about 50% of blacks not having jobs. It was 48.2% do not have a job. My mistake! Any thing else I can answer

How do you account for mixed race individuals, genius...

(define Tiger Woods for me?)














apologies to RG, but turtles snack on trolls occasionally.

I count them as half points.

I'm split more than that. then what...

Pigeonholing is for folks can't see multiple problems, or solutions.

Well, that means that members of all racial groups who do such things must be sub human as well.

And, since most crimes of that type are committed by men, the logical conclusion is that men, of all racial groups are sub human when compared to women.

That, of course, explains why men cannot learn to put the toilet seat back down, and why fart jokes appeal to adolescent males.

And it certainly proves that women are the more civilized gender and should take over the reins of power on an international scale.

This is what you said in your post.

In the scientific spirit of Primotivo, I am more than willing to back up my assertions about the sub human nature of males--based on their documented greater frequency of violent crimes when compared to women

http://social.jrank.org/pages/1253/Violent-Crime-Gender-Differences-in-Violent-Crime-Offenders.html

Is it any wonder the planet is in such bad shape--look who's been in charge?

Obviously, the problems with the male of the species are genetically based (that pesky Y chromosome), and therefore include men of all racial groups.

But, following the example of Primotivo, I must add that some men are good. Not many, but some.

Only if they don't have a Maggie chromosome.

Aww, c'mon, compared to Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan and Hitler, Maggie was a pussycat.

For sheer mindless brutality the men are tops. Being less highly evolved, and consequently more sub human than women, results in their inability to control their baser, more primitive, animalistic impulses.

Ever see how excited men get when a brawl breaks out at a sporting event? And which gender starts such brawls? I rest my case.

But, again, some men are good. There are a few exceptions...not many, but a few.

I find that virtually all you've related is true, firefly.

It'll take a good, no, a great, no a sensational women leader not to fall into the trap of being a man leader.

That clearly isn't a Sarah Palin.

Ah, but Sarah Palin, with her strong dedication to abstinence-only programs, does have the potential to lead the international Lysistrata Movement--the taming of men by withholding sexual favors.
Both Sarah, and daughter Bristol, obvious symbols of female fecundity, would be the perfect types to both tantalize the males and to demand non-aggressive, more "human" behaviors as the condition for female sexual acquiescence.

The real question to ponder is whether we need selective breeding of those "few good men"--cloning only those who display the appropriate "human" qualities and preventing the rest from engaging in any breeding.
The non-breeders could be allowed to work off their aggressiveness in sports, doing housework (scrubbing floors and vacuuming are wonderful outlets), and cooking (all that chopping and grinding). Since the males would be at home more, we would outlaw the disposable diapers that clog our landfills, and again use cotton diapers which can be rewashed and reused (all that scrubing is also a good sublimation for the male aggressive impulses).

Male energy and brawn would be harnessed, by the females, to do those things necessary to reverse global warming.
Leaving towels and clothes on bathroom and bedroom floors would become felony offenses, with no plea bargaining allowed.
Consumption of beer while watching sporting events (even those on tv) would be a privilege granted to only some men who can demonstrate appropriate "human" behaviors, including the ability to control belching.
Those men, who have demonstrated good self control ability, would be trained in advanced bargain hunting and shopping skills, to further channel their primitive hunting and competitive instincts into more civilized outlets, and to also help them them to acquire basic rudimentary economic responsibilty.

We really owe a debt of gratitude to Primotivo for pointing out to us the inherent genetic deficiencies which make certain groups less than "human", even though a small number of individuals within those groups may be good. Now that our consciousness has been raised, we need to take some action.

There's only one thing wrong with your argument, firefly. If, as you suggest, men, as a group, are sub-human, there's a logical reason for it. MEN WERE MOSTLY RAISED AND NURTURED BY WOMEN, DAMMIT!! No wonder they (we) are mostly fucked-up.

Merry Andrew, I am only logically extending Primotivo's line of reasoning regarding blacks. Primotivo has described certain behaviors of blacks as being "sub-human", and these behaviors just happen to be much more typical of men than of women, regardless of race. Ergo, men must be sub-human when compared to women.
The behaviors in question are assumed, by Primotivo, to be genetic. Therefore, your mother, and her child rearing practices, had nothing to do with those qualities--they would be due to nature, not nurture.

I shudder to think what you guys would be like if you hadn't had that strong female presence in your childhoods.

These are Primotivo's basic hypotheses and not mine. I'm just logically extending the line of reasoning ad absurdum.

And, it's not all of you men. Some of you are good. You know which ones you are..

I HAVE PROOF "THE NEGROS" ARE INFERIOR!

africa zomg has like teh, umm stoopit governments, and wars and stuff...
and they cant control theyz inflamed moniez, they beez so inferiorz to us white folkz.

i r have proofz.

/SARCASM.

I'm still sticking to my guns, firefly (how macho of me, right?). My contention that men tend to be violent because they've been raised by women is valid. I just wonder whether Primitivo has considered the corollary possibility that if black persons constitute an undesirable minority among us "humans" it's only because they were raised in a largely white society, taught by mostly white teachers and inculcated with the value system of mostly dead white men of European descent.