3
   

Circumcision gone wrong: Man Sues Doctors For Amputating Penis

 
 
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 04:34 am
Man Sues Doctors For Amputating Penis

Quote:
What part of "circumcision" was unclear? That's basically what a Kentucky man and his wife are asking of two doctors who cut off the man's penis while he was under the knife. The doctors say they discovered cancer and made an emergency decision. The man says, dude, wtf, you cut off my penis. It doesn't grow back, and it was kind of important to me.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 3 • Views: 2,335 • Replies: 15
No top replies

 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 05:02 am
@Robert Gentel,
In order to liberate the penis it was necessary to destroy it.
0 Replies
 
chai2
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 05:40 am
I need more information.

How invasive was the cancer?
What type was it?

When go under the knife every day for a routine procedure, and wake up sans utererus and ovaries.
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 06:12 am
@chai2,
chai2 wrote:

I need more information.

How invasive was the cancer?
What type was it?

When go under the knife every day for a routine procedure, and wake up sans utererus and ovaries.


Erm....the nature of the cancer is a bit immaterial.

There would have been nothing to stop the medical team from waking the poor fella and talking to him.

If "whens" are women, and women are going in for routine procedures and waking up without uterii and ovaries, then, in the absence of the discovery of a catastrophic heammorhage or infection or somesuch during surgery, they are having illegal operations unless they consented to such surgery taking place if deemed necessary.

This happening to women does not make the removal of a penis without consent ok.

sozobe
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 06:14 am
@dlowan,
Yeah... eek.

I think the guy messed up and then tried to cover for it. (Yep, cancer, I swear...)
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 06:16 am
@sozobe,
Well, that's easily determined by examining the penis.
sozobe
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 06:17 am
@dlowan,
Yeah. I read the whole article and it didn't say.
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 06:19 am
@sozobe,
Yeah.....the article loked kind of iffy to me.

The site looked kind of iffy.

(Do Americans do "iffy"?)
sozobe
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 06:23 am
@dlowan,
We invented "iffy."

In fact, I did. In 1978. A Tuesday, I believe.
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 06:25 am
@sozobe,
I was using iffy before that.

You imperialist, you!

I invented matronising too, so take that!



Confused
sozobe
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 06:27 am
@dlowan,
fluffybutt wrote:
I invented matronising too, so take that!


The word or the 'tude?
dadpad
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 06:27 am
Dapad runs naked and screaming through the room.
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 07:17 am
@sozobe,
hankyhead wrote:

fluffybutt wrote:
I invented matronising too, so take that!


The word or the 'tude?


Word.


I think it's a dead heat who invented the 'tude.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 07:18 am
@dadpad,
marsupial brain wrote:
Dapad runs naked and screaming through the room.


Why?
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 08:27 am
@dlowan,
fluffy butt wrote:

marsupial brain wrote:
Dapad runs naked and screaming through the room.


Why?


Because I am an attention whore
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 09:41 am
Since when is it necessary to have general anesthesia for a routine circumcision?

Oh wait, I see from the article that the guy is also suing the anesthesiologist.

Sounds to me like the entire operation was just an enormous cock-up.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Circumcision gone wrong: Man Sues Doctors For Amputating Penis
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/12/2020 at 04:11:22