Well, it's a controversial thing that someone wants to embed within society. Therefore it must be done to fight terrorism.
The easiest way to get something egregious accepted by the public is to tell people you are saving them from terrorists. Two years after 9/11 the excuse still works, and still carries an emotional charge that prevents people from thinking freely and independently.
Leveraging the threat of terrorism is the most powerful tool since fire or money! It's a marketting dream and a political goldmine. We need more fear, more terrorism, so we can sway public opinion about any issue under the sun. What a sales job! Our freedom has been sold to anyone who pretends to protect us.
Obviously, the ability to track any merchandise wherever it goes is a matter of national security, same as any invasion of privacy. I think far more damage has been done to society by *our reaction* to WTC than the actual WTC event itself.
---- TECHNICAL INFO ----
No power source is required. The RFID chip is the size of a grain of sand, costs $0.05, and uses the energy from the incoming radio wave to calculate and respond with a unique serial number and product description.
Some of them can be encrypted, so only an authorized reader can detect and read them -- in which case only the person who plants the chip would even know it's there.
Larger RFID's are already in widespread use:
From
http://www.darwinmag.com/read/machineshop/column.html?ArticleID=111
Quote:There are now hundreds of millions of RFID devices in circulation, and companies like the giant Proctor and Gamble want billions more.
Eleven McDonald's restaurants are running pilot programs with RFID payment wands made by Texas Instruments. [...] readers can detect tags as far as 90 feet away. RFID tags can also be detected faster, often in less than 100 milliseconds, and can store more data, up to 1MB."
More info available at two previous threads:
Jun 9 -
John Ashcroft must be salavating over new tiny ID chips
Jun 16 -
Wal-Mart Following you Home? (many references here)