1
   

U.S. probe focuses on Syria weapons

 
 
Reply Tue 16 Sep, 2003 11:35 pm
The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com
U.S. probe focuses on Syria weapons
By Bill Gertz
Published September 17, 2003

The U.S. government is investigating intelligence reports that Iraq sent weapons to Syria to hide them from U.N. inspectors and coalition troops in Iraq, a senior State Department official said yesterday.
John Bolton, the undersecretary of state for arms control, also told a House International Relations subcommittee that Syria is developing medium-range missiles with help from North Korea and Iran that could be fired in nerve gas attacks hundreds of miles from Syria's borders.
He testified in open and closed sessions that Syria continues to take hostile actions against U.S. and coalition troops in Iraq by permitting sympathizers of Saddam Hussein to enter Iraq to kill Americans.
"Syria permitted volunteers to pass into Iraq to attack and kill our service members during the war, and is still doing so," Mr. Bolton said.
"September 11, we were reminded of the need to remain steadfast in recognizing emerging threats to our security," Mr. Bolton said. "In Syria, we see expanding [weapons of mass destruction] capabilities and continued state sponsorship of terrorism."
Mr. Bolton said that "we cannot allow the world's most dangerous weapons to fall into the hands of the world's most dangerous regimes, and will work tirelessly to ensure this is not the case for Syria."
Syria has purchased nuclear goods that indicate it may use a Chinese-made reactor to build nuclear arms, he said.
Also, the Syrians are working on offensive biological weapons, he said.
Mr. Bolton stated that Syria has several hundred Scud and SS-21 short-range missiles and has built a longer-range Scud D with help from North Korea. The Scud D has a range of some 310 miles and Syria test-fired one in 2000.
Some of the missiles can be outfitted with deadly nerve gas warheads, Mr. Bolton said.
During a closed-door session, Mr. Bolton showed the committee a map highlighting the ranges of Syrian missiles and future missiles, including a version of the North Korean Nodong that has a range of 620 miles, enough to hit targets throughout the Middle East.
Syria has one of the most advanced chemical weapons programs in the Arab world that includes the nerve agent sarin and the more deadly nerve gas known as VX, Mr. Bolton said.
"Syria's missiles are mobile and can reach much of Israel from positions near their peacetime garrisons and portions of Iraq, Jordan and Turkey from launch sites well within the country," Mr. Bolton said in his prepared testimony.
"Damascus is pursuing both solid- and liquid-propellant missile programs and relies extensively on foreign assistance in these endeavors," he said.
Mr. Bolton was scheduled to present the testimony on Syrian weapons programs last month, but elements of the U.S. intelligence community blocked the testimony to avoid offending Damascus, which has established a limited liaison program with the CIA.
Mr. Bolton told the subcommittee that his testimony yesterday was approved by the U.S. intelligence and policy communities.
Asked whether he favored changing the regime of Syrian leader Bashar Assad, Mr. Bolton said "our preference is to solve these problems by peaceful and diplomatic means."
Regarding reports that Iraq hid weapons in Syria, Mr. Bolton said: "We have seen these reports, reviewed them carefully, and see them as cause for concern."
"Thus far, we have been unable to confirm that such transfers occurred," he said.
At the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said he has seen "snippets of information over time" about weapons transfers from Iraq to Syria.
"We know they buried MiG airplanes," Mr. Rumsfeld told reporters. "We know they buried a lot of things. And we know in the prior war they flew their planes into Iran, for example."
Other U.S. officials said numerous intelligence reports from a variety of sources indicate that the transfers of Iraqi weapons took place.
Some of the reports have been in recent weeks, the officials said.
However, many intelligence analysts are reluctant to make judgments on the intelligence because of the recent controversy over Iraq's purported attempts to buy uranium ore from Niger, the officials said.
Syria's government continues to deny that any weapons were transferred.
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Florida Republican and chairman of the subcommittee on the Middle East and Central Asia, which held the hearing, said the reports of Iraqi arms shipments to Iraq suggest biological or chemical weapons were sent there.
"There are disputes between agencies," she said in an interview. "No matter what the view, the answer is we really don't know the extent to which this happened. On the other hand, nobody's saying it didn't happen."
Mrs. Ros-Lehtinen said the hearing was held on legislation she is co-sponsoring that would lead to sanctions on Syria for its weapons of mass destruction programs and support for terrorism.
Rep. Gary L. Ackerman, New York Democrat, said the testimony appeared to be a warning to Syria.
"I think the administration is sending a trial balloon to the Syrians to take a look over the border and see what happens to the people who don't listen to us," Mr. Ackerman said in an interview.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 527 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Sep, 2003 11:42 pm
This is what BBB predicted
I posted a prediction early this year prior to the invasion of Iraq that I thought Saddam had sent any WMD he still had to Syria for hiding by the Ba'ath party.

---BumbleBeeBoogie
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Sep, 2003 08:36 am
Consider the source. Bolton is well known for making claims that cannot be backed up.Bolton the fibber.
Quote:
Leak of the Week: The Bolton Testimony
Judith Miller. Again.
By Jack Shafer
Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 4:22 PM PT

Suppose you had an advance copy of the testimony that Undersecretary of State John R. Bolton was scheduled to give to a House subcommittee today that details the dangers posed by Syria's unconventional weapons program. And let's suppose that you wanted to leak it to the reporter who would give it the most favorable bounce in today's papers. Would you give it to New York Times reporter Douglas Jehl, who followed a Knight Ridder story on July 18, 2003, with a critical account of how the CIA and other agencies blocked Bolton's July House appearance?

Or would you give it to Judith Miller, the New York Times reporter who has given sympathetic play time and again to leakers and defectors bearing information about weapons of mass destruction?

You needn't ask.

Writing in today's Times ("Senior U.S. Official To Level Weapons Charges Against Syria"), Miller gives Bolton and his leaked testimony a very friendly hearing. You'd never know from reading Miller that in July the intelligence agencies censored Bolton from testifying on the same subject to the same subcommittee because, according to Jehl's anonymous sources, his speech did not jibe with the CIA's less menacing findings about Syria's unconventional weapons capacity. A memo exceeding 35 pages spelled out CIA objections, Jehl wrote.

Nor was this the first time Bolton overhyped intelligence findings. In May 2002, Jehl writes, Bolton gave a speech alleging that Cuba had a biological weapons program, an opinion not supported by intelligence data. Bolton's June testimony to Congress about Syria's nuclear and biological warfare programs sounded a much louder alarm than did an April CIA report to Congress, Jehl adds. This context, which appears nowhere in Miller's story, would tell readers that Bolton is very much not an authoritative source on unconventional weapons in Syria. In fact, he's a highly biased source with a weapons agenda that the CIA finds dubious. Perhaps someone should purchase Miller's editors a gift subscription to the New York Times so they can acquaint themselves with the skeptical reporting of her colleagues.

Give Miller and her editors credit?-but not too much?-for describing the motives of the testimony leakers, who are "individuals who feel that the accusations against Syria have received insufficient attention." Whenever reporters disclose the motives and interests of their leakers and anonymous sources, they improve their copy by giving readers a needed frame of reference through which they may judge the information. Is the source a disinterested party? One of the players? A whistleblower? A pay-back artist? The floater of a trial balloon? This is a prime example of the identity of the leaker or anonymous source having more news value than anything leaked.

Miller's description of her leakers, combined with her selective portrayal of serial exaggerator Bolton and her undoubting write-up of his testimony, leads me to speculate that this leak was authorized on some official level. If calculated to drum up interest in Bolton's views on the day of his congressional performance, the leak succeeded marvelously. What would have been just a one-day story in the newspapers ("Bolton Warns of Syrian Peril") will become a two-day affair in which a preview and a review of his testimony receive wide exposure.

In the past two years, Miller has given ample evidence that she's a sucker for Iraqi defectors. Has she now become a valued member of the administration's publicity machine?
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Sep, 2003 11:06 am
Blix Says Iraq Probably Destroyed WMDs
Today: September 17, 2003 at 3:03:29 PDT
Blix Says Iraq Probably Destroyed WMDs
ASSOCIATED PRESS

SYDNEY, Australia (AP) - Former U.N. chief weapons inspector Hans Blix believes that Iraq destroyed most of its weapons of mass destruction 10 years ago, but kept up the appearance that it had them to deter a military attack.

In an interview with an Australian radio station broadcast Wednesday, Blix said it was unlikely that the U.S and British teams now searching for weapons in Iraq would find more than some "documents of interest."

"I'm certainly more and more to the conclusion that Iraq has, as they maintained, destroyed all, almost, of what they had in the summer of 1991," Blix told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.

"The more time that has passed, the more I think it's unlikely that anything will be found."

Blix indicated he thought the U.S.-led coalition had backtracked on the issue of Iraq's weapons.

"In the beginning they talked about weapons concretely, and later on they talked about weapons programs. Maybe they'll find some documents of interest," he said.

Blix, who spent three years searching for Iraqi chemical, biological and ballistic missiles as head of the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission, said Iraq might have tried to fool the United States into believing it had weapons of mass destruction over the years in order to deter attack.

"I mean, you can put up a sign on your door, 'Beware of the Dog,' without having a dog," he said from his home in Sweden.

The United States and its allies Britain and Australia invaded Iraq in May after saying Saddam Hussein's regime was developing nuclear arms as well as chemical and biological weapons.

However, a search by the U.S.-led Iraq Survey Group - which is made up of some 1,400 scientists, military and intelligence experts - has failed to uncover any weapons of mass destruction since the conflict ended.

President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair have come under increasing pressure to prove that Iraq had a weapons of mass destruction.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » U.S. probe focuses on Syria weapons
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/11/2026 at 04:38:53