0
   

art or vandalism?

 
 
OGIONIK
 
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 11:57 pm
well i have to say, i was in the graffiti scene for a long time. this is a pretty big issue inside of it. i dont spraypaint walls, for a few , umm years damn im old.

can graffiti be an art?

is it just relieving anger?

can art even be defined?

is graffiti just an offshoot of calligraphy, with less letter diversity and more egotism on a different medium?

whats the point anyway? whats not the point?

o.g. ionik one... just wondering why.............
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,107 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 12:35 am
Would it be art if they used your car for a canvas?
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 12:49 am
im not sure that pertains to the subject...


what are they doing to my car that i dont own yet?
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 12:50 am
I'm thinking that the difference between art and vandalism just might lie in whose property they might be painting. To you, I suppose that defines it as art.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 12:53 am
i dont destroy other peoples property, is it art?

i use canvas squares.
0 Replies
 
Shapeless
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 12:54 am
Re: art or vandalism?
OGIONIK wrote:
can graffiti be an art?

is it just relieving anger?


Those two things are certainly not mutually exclusive.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 01:00 am
good point, art is expression fo emotion in my opinion...


even if it is damaging others peoples property, it can still be art?

hrmm... maybe my refusal to harm property has been gimping me in expressing my artistic side.


i hope not. if someone painted my **** id beat the **** out of them.
0 Replies
 
Shapeless
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 01:29 am
OGIONIK wrote:
even if it is damaging others peoples property, it can still be art?


Sure. You'll just get sued for it, that's all.
0 Replies
 
agrote
 
  2  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 02:58 am
Some graffiti is just craft, I would say. Like calligraphy. It's a skillful action that requires practice and effort, but it doesn't make anybody look at the world differently, or give them the sort of substantial aesthetic pleasure they might get from looking at a Picasso. I think that may be the case with a lot of so-called graffiti which is done on canvas, or in other non-vandalising ways. If all the graffiti 'artist' does is imitate certain styles of writing and drawing - without doing anything new with them or adding any substance to them - then maybe he/she is a craftsman rather than an artist.

But some graffiti may be art. Maybe most of it, I don't know. Graffiti 'artists' who paint the sides of buildings certainly have a different way of looking at urban environments, and if they're able to share that perspective with the viewer when they do their work, then perhaps they really are artists.

I guess "spray paint on wall" is just a medium, like "oil on canvas" or "pencil on paper". It has the potential to be used to produce works of art or works of craft, like other mediums. With a pencil and paper you could draw Escher's Relativity (art) or you could draw Winnie the Pooh (illustration).

So I think the answer to whether graffiti is art is, "it depends." Not all graffiti is art, but it's possibile to do graffiti which is art.

Or maybe all graffiti is art, and some of it is just bad art. I'm not sure.

As for whether graffiti is vandalism, I think that's a legal matter. And I don't think it is relevant to whether graffiti is art. It maybe illegal to spray paint all over somebody's car, but that doesn't stop it being art.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 04:45 am
It looks to me like most graffiti people perfect one technique, then repeat nearly identical patterns. They might can develope into black velvet artists with a little more refining of their skill.
0 Replies
 
hanno
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 05:47 am
It's not art - and I don't say that because I disagree with the Oscar Wilde definition. The reason is simple, if you're going to expand your media beyond what is socially acceptable then you're in the same genre as liquor-store-robbers and hence out-classed and trivialized from the get-go - what's a little paint, risk, squalid turf nonsense compared to what they do? I mean, give me a pound of gold and a hammer, and although what I come up with will be shiny, Aztec gold it will not be - so should I pat myself on the back for making something shiny or kick myself in the ass for screwing up the raw materials? Same thing with graffiti, someone takes an advantage, and screws around with it instead of getting down with higher realities of the situation.

Forgive me, but this gangster script is entirely squalid - the reason is that it's civilized. It's all about the peer-group, social-order, identity, culture. It might look cool because it's anti-establishment but where does it lead? What would a world run by ballers look like if it went all the way? India. Ramafuchs 300th row of ancestors counting back would have been OGs.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 07:40 am
There are people (or, as some suspect, peoples) like Banksy who surely qualify as artists.

And then there are taggers who certainly qualify as vandals.

It really depends on what style you're talking about.

Several years ago I paid several hundreds of dollars to have a graffiti artist paint a wall in my photo studio. Tracking one down was not the easiest thing I've ever done by a longshot since the culture is pretty underground and middle aged women tend to make them scatter.

When I finally tracked one down it was amazing and impressive to watch him work; such surity with such simple tools. Fascinating.

I've noticed a lot of people advertising on craigslist for graffiti artists over the last couple of years. I eventually want to have my basement painted graffiti style.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » art or vandalism?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 06:20:12