Re: Do Hurricanes help shape the US East Coast?
rosborne979 wrote:The shape of the US coast from Florida to the Virginias looks like it might be worn down from repeaded exposure to Hurricanes.
Is there any evidence to this conjecture, or is it just a visual coincidence?
Thanks,
I found this forum while Googling for something else. I'll try to keep the facts generalized, and the geologic details to a minimum in my reply...
Ocean waves [in general] transfer energy to a depth of one-half of their wavelength (lambda). Coastlines tend to have some curvature, and the tidal basin just offshore tends to be comprised of a concave-upward surface. As a result of all of this, incoming waves experience drag on the tidal basin and shoreline and are subsequently refracted. Since we are dealing with curved features, waves rarely crash ashore in a straight line.
As waves do crash ashore, and sediment [sands, shells, etc.] are picked up and erosion occurs. Next time you are at the beach, watch how the dirty wave rolls up the beach and curves, or drifts, slightly along the beach as it falls back toward the ocean. This effect occurs all along the wave fronts that are striking at olbique angles due to the curvilinear nature of shoreline. This sequential pattern of wave front striking, rolling out, and falling back to the ocean creates a migrating sheet of sand along the beach. This erosional process is commonly referred as Longshore Drift:
On the beach-scale, wind waves do sculpt the geometry of the beach all the time. Build a seawall perpendicular to the beach and you find sand piling up on one side of it in one season. Build a dam upstream of a river that is supplying sand for the beach, and in a few years the beach starts to thin out. With a hurricane, yes the wind waves are much larger, and half-lambda will be much deeper. However, the amount of rainfall inland will generate flooding and transport of immense quantities of sediment that a hurricane would displace at the beach. Off-setting erosional processes.
At the seaboard-scale, plate tectonics is the main process at work. Referring to Fishin's image of the topography of the mid-Atlantic Basin, note the location and geometry of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. That is where sea-floor spreading has been occurring for about 250 million years or so. Mentally piece together the southeast coast of the United States to the northwest coast of the African Continent. Use the fracture traces and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge as a guide. You will see that the whole Eastern Seaboard fits quite well with Africa and parts of southern Europe:
I'll refrain from discussing the mountain building event that created the Appalachian Mountains. However, check this easy-to-follow graphic:
www.wm.edu/geology/virginia/tectonic_history.html
Now, back to hurricanes. What hurricanes will affect are areas of recent deposition in what would normally be in calm, shallow sedimentary basins. The Mississippi Delta and the Gulf of Mexico, for example. Deltas are loosely classified into two main groups: wave-dominated and tide-dominated. Some distributaries and mouth bars will be completely destroyed, let alone re-arranged. Channels clogged with sediment recently deposited by a storm surge will be forced to jump-channel [avulsion], and create a new distributary channel. This change in coastal geometry would be noticable at a pretty large scale, such as a view from an airliner cruising at an altitude of 30,000 feet.
Wordy, I know.
Hope it helps though! If there is one take-away from all this it is:
Geology is scale-dependant.[/u]