RLQuote:And so what if they don't agree?
Then Id believe that the fundamental differences that IDers have from Creationists would make a substantive schism inthe movements. After all, Behe (the IDers) agrees with mainstream science on most issues , so he could really be a problem to strict Creationists YEC's .
I believe that , youve try to hide in therather large clot of "believing" scientists and all those bogus statistics about belief as a central core of "most " of the countrywhen, after all, when viewed dispassionately, many of the believing scientists do NOTAT ALL accept the strict Biblical interpretations that you seem to preach. (Floods, Sudden Appearances, YECism, No evolution , no fossil record, no geological processes of a really old erth, no physical chemical testing methods valid, no physics (magnetism) that suggests an old dynamic earth, ) generally, you believe that most all science is fundamentally flawed in its collective abilities to dte, predict,interpret.
When significant numbers of your "monolithic" organization actually show widely different beliefs, I call that more than a "so what".
I could be wrong, but Im not.