RexRed wrote:Both processes still require a surrogate.
No, it does not. I told you, Desert Whiptail lizards don't require a male. There is no female sperm involved at all. It's just a female lizard undergoing parthogenesis.
Quote:Even though both processes are theoretically possible they still require the human to "carry" or transmit the life form.
Which would be the woman, whose womb directly acts on the developing fetus and shapes the fingerprints and footprints of the developing fetus, possibly amongst other things. If anything, the female puts far more effort into creating life than a male does, because not only does she provide an egg that has far more contents than the sperm actually provides (DNA, cytoplasm, organelles and mitochondria compared to just the DNA of the sperm), she also has to incubate the fetus in her womb, the environment of which affects the development of the fetus. She provides nutrients, her womb helps shape a fetus's fingerprints, it does far more than a single Y chromsome ever does.
Quote:This does not prove that the life essence is not commingled. Though genetic material is not transferred it is unknown how and when life is actually derived.
Rubbish. The egg is alive. The sperm is alive. All biological cells are by definition alive. If they were dead, they would be of no use to us. No life is derived, because both the things that came together to form a fetus were alive to begin with.
Quote:This is not necessarily an argument but a simple questioning of the ability science has to isolate what life really is and how it passes through biology.
No, it isn't. We can clearly see that it isn't by looking at your posts and seeing how you go from one specious argument to another. What did your original "Y chromosome is solely responsible for evolution" comment have to do with what life really is? You're fixated on the idea of the Y chromosome and are trying to, for some unfathomable reason, elevate it to levels of importance to fit in with your beliefs.
Quote:What does define life? Why do seemingly lower forms of life have heightened senses?
Higher and lower refers only to the position of a species on the "Tree of Life", Linnaeus' branched classification system. It does not refer to an species' superiority. If it is inferior, it is by defintion, either in decline or extinct.
Only Creationists believe that mankind is higher than other animals.
I'd also like to point out that your second question does not follow from your first and that it is rather confusing to put them together.
Did the dinosaurs "breath" the same air we do? Just because the physical part is in our junk DNA does not mean automatically that the life is the exact same.
Does life exist within a set of parameters or does the physical world exist due to the presence of life. Chicken or egg...
Is X the propose of Y or Y the purpose of X? Energy equals mass just as life equals the physical biology. They are echoes of creation. Light is both a wave and a particle. Light is both and egg and a seed.
Quote:A man will always be able to create a woman from using two of his X chromosomes (providing he can find a way to grow the fetus.) but a woman will be able to "alone" without the Y chromosome create women only.
You see, this is why I object to your points. You know nothing about basic biology and yet you insist on stating things authoritatively as if you know everything. Furthermore, I've told you some of the following information before, but your above paragraph shows that you have either ignored me or are just unwilling to learn.
A sperm can only transmit one X chromosome or one Y chromosome. It cannot transmit two sex chromsomes. Sperm with two sex chromosomes are by definition abnormal and do not function properly enough to fertilise an egg. In addition, a man cannot use two of his X chromosomes because, as I've told you before, a male genome more often than not, only contains one X chromosome.
This, RexRed, is basic biology.
There are males out there who have more than one X chromosome, but they are rare and because they have more than one X chromosome in their genome, they suffer from a disorder called Kleinfelter's disorder which more often than not renders the subject infertile.
A female on the other hand can create a female without the need for a Y chromosome, as I have told you before. That is because a female has two X chromosomes and no Y chromosome. The Desert Grassland Whiptail lizard,
Aspidoscelis uniparens, which I've mentioned before, manages to create female offspring without the need for a male and therefore without the need for a Y chromosome.
real life wrote:The assumption that parts of DNA are 'junk' simply because we don't know the function is a great example of the arrogance of some 'scientific ' types .
That is not arrogance. It is practical. We call it junk, because we don't know the function. Once we know the function, it ceases to be called junk.
What is arrogant, however, is claiming that because we don't know how something could have happened, some deity must be responsible. That is the Creationist and ID position, your position.