1
   

You cant change the world without bloodshed

 
 
aperson
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Jul, 2008 05:46 pm
Um... yea pretty much.
0 Replies
 
hanno
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Jul, 2008 10:23 pm
0 Replies
 
whiteviolet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jul, 2008 10:58 am
Depends what you mean by "change the world". If changing consensus views counts, which I would include in the definition, then obviously people such as the founder of charities such as Reprieve and Kids Company have changed the world.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jul, 2008 09:09 pm
i think this is generally true, but not specifically.
0 Replies
 
babsatamelia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 09:30 pm
Well now, let me think here. Hmmmm. There has been bloodshed since the beginning of time as far as I can recall from any study of history I indulged in. If it had resulted in any real or lasting change, that would be apparent already by the end of that bloodshed. Apparently bloodshed just doesn't work, which is why human beings keep on doing it. Anything that goes against the principle of survival of the fittest, of the continuing our species, that is precisely what the human creature will do. So as you can see the answer is really painfully obvious.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
DOES NOTHING EXIST??? - Question by mark noble
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/20/2019 at 12:10:52