Reply
Mon 3 Mar, 2008 08:24 am
Hello! I think that many people would agree with me that separation of Kosovo is a very-very complicated matter that might have far-reaching after-effects even though we don't want them. Be that as it may, the decision to split Kosovo apart was produced by Washington with the only intention to reconsider the Post-war Europe to the benefit of Americans themselves. The after-effects I was speaking about do not only deal with spread of Albanian mafia throughout EU but something much more complicated and difficult to settle - I mean separatist trends allover the world. Once the Kosovo case gets recognized by the world community, this automatically makes separatists in dozens of regions free of demanding sovereignty as well.
Now let us consider an individual case. On 19 March, president of Georgia Mikhail Saakashvili is going on visit to Washington. Beyond all doubt, George Bush will try to talk Saakashvili into recognition of Kosovo sovereignty (by this moment Saakashvili is still hesitating - not without reason of course). If only Saakashvili recognizes the Kosovo precedent, this means he is obliged to recognize sovereignty of Georgian break-away autonomies of Abkhazia and South Ossetia while he used to say he would never do that. So as it turns out, by doing this, the US is deliberately pushing its anti-terror war ally Georgia to a break up! Then it becomes clear that the US actually does not care about anything else except its own advantage! That's double-dealing!
Who wrote your propaganda post for you? The KGB? "Putvedev"? A Serbian mass murderer?
what are the differences and similarities between s-ossetia and kosovo? to what extent has russia meddled? for one thing s-ossetia is rather small - the population of a small city or large village.
/Kayyam