neologist wrote:What would be your standard? Consider a cue ball.
For the purpose of playing a game of 8 ball, an ordinary cue ball would be perfect, wouldn't you say?
Yet, if you were to examine the surface under a microscope, you might be inclined to say otherwise.
Then consider man's relation to God. If we had been created and programmed to complete obedience, would you consider that a perfect situation? I hear the words robot and puppet rumbling off my keyboard. Oh wait, now I see them.
If we accept the premise that God is perfect, yet is willing to allow his creatures the free will to choose disobedience, it raises a lot of issues that have yet to be resolved. I'll try to list a few;
1] Does God have the right to demand obedience from his creation?
2] Would sentient creatures serve God out of selfishness or out of love?
3] Does God have the power to complete his purpose despite the rebellion?
I assert that the 'perfect' God has the right to demand obedience. He created us; he ought to know what is best for us; and he claims to have love for us.
Both Job and Jesus, as well as others, have answered #2 on the side of love.
As far as # 3 is concerned - well, let some others stir this pot for a while.
edited
I think you've touched on a good point here.
I think you will agree with me that no one, save possibly God, would be completely perfect. But could something be perfect for their purpose?
Then again, could any being that is not completely perfect have the right to be perfect?
As for your questions.
1. Yes. A being who can be called God must have the power to do anything. But whether he would is a different question, one to which I would answer no.
2 Are you talking Pascal's Wagar selfishness. Because I think a high percentage of Christians are Christian in fear of hell. I agree some, like Jesus, Job and some loving Christians, do love Him in love.
3. What rebellion, what purpose?