1
   

“Classical metaphysical realism cannot be true”

 
 
coberst
 
Reply Tue 12 Feb, 2008 05:18 am
"Classical metaphysical realism cannot be true"

Cognitive science has introduced a new way of viewing the world and our self by declaring a new paradigm which I call the embodied mind. The primary focus is upon the fact that there is no mind/body duality but that there is indeed an integrated mind and body. The mind and body are as integrated as is the heart and the body.

The human thought process is dominated by the characteristic of our integrated body. The sensorimotor neural network is an integral part of our mind. The neural network that makes movement and perception possible is the same network that processes our thinking.

The unconscious categories that guide our human response to the world are constructed in the same way as are the categories that make it possible of other animals to survive in the world. We form categories both consciously and unconsciously.

Why do we feel that both our consciously created and unconsciously created categories fit the world?

Our consciously formed concepts fit the world, more or less, because we consciously examine the world with our senses and our reason and classify that world into these concepts we call categories.

Our unconsciously formed categories are a different matter. Our unconsciously formed categories fit our world because these basic-level categories "have evolved to form at least one important class of categories that optimally fit our bodily experiences of entities and certain extremely important differences in the natural environment".

Our perceptual system has little difficulty distinguishing between dogs and cows or rats and squirrels. Investigation of this matter makes clear that we distinguish most readily those folk versions of biological genera, i.e. those "that have evolved significantly distinct shapes so as to take advantage of different features of their environment."The differences between basic-level and non basic-level categories is based upon bodily characteristics. The basic-level categories are dependent upon gestalt perception, sensorimotor programs, and mental images. "Because of this, classical metaphysical realism cannot be true, since the properties of categories are mediated by the body rather than determined directly by a mind-independent reality"

In humans basic level categories are developed primarily based upon our bodily configuration and its interrelationship with the environment. For other animals almost all, if not all, categories are basic-level categories.

What is classical metaphysical realism?

Quotes from "Philosophy in the Flesh" by Lakoff and Johnson
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 641 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Feb, 2008 05:41 am
Yeah, right, Coberst.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Feb, 2008 01:36 pm
Coberst,

Quote:
Classical metaphysical realism cannot be true


Since Kant, of course not !

Non-duality is hardly original nor does it benefit by being plagaristically subsumed under the pretentious label "cognitive science". Read Piaget, Maturana and Wittgenstein and then perhaps you might see through Lakoff's simplistic nonsense about "categories".

(If you want to know what "classical metaphysical realism" is about read the "ontological assumptions of science thread")
0 Replies
 
coberst
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Feb, 2008 03:41 am
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Feb, 2008 09:02 am
Coberst,

Thats the same twaddle you have justed posted on other forums.

Why don't you reply to my actual challenge to your source material ?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » “Classical metaphysical realism cannot be true”
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 10:26:31