The truth about black holes

Forums: Science And Math
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Basic reality: There ain't no such ****ing thing as a "black hole":

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=wkq3oUXUrfQ

A black hole, as the video describes, is basically a necessity only to those who erroneously insist on believing that gravity holds galaxies together; nobody else needs them.

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 5,194 • Replies: 24

No top replies

What nutty rubbish are you spouting now?

0 Replies

Re: The truth about black holes

gungasnake wrote:

Basic reality: There ain't no such ****ing thing as a "black hole"

Not even the ones with hair around?

0 Replies

Pshaw. Everyone knows galaxies are held together with super glue and duct tape.

0 Replies

THE CREATION EXPLAINED SOME BRIT

0 Replies

Arrg, me maties,

Galaxies are held together by His noodly appendages.

Ramen.

0 Replies

I'm afraid you don't know what you're talking about. In 1916 Karl Schwarzschild noticed black holes in certain solutions of the General Relativity field equations. They exist if General Relativity is correct. This has nothing whatever to do with someone wanting them to exist.

0 Replies

Re: The truth about black holes

gungasnake wrote:

Basic reality: There ain't no such ****ing thing as a "black hole":

But I like Black Holes, they make so much ****ing sense.

Event Horizons make sense, accretion disks make sense, galactic cores make sense, even the basic core physics of the system just make sense. And now we have to replace the whole theory with poof the magic plasma? I don't think so.

We would have a bigger mystery on our hands if Black Holes didn't exist, because then we would have to explain why, and we couldn't do it.

0 Replies

Brandon9000 wrote:

They exist if General Relativity is correct. .....

It isn't. These are simply the kinds of things which Marcelus Wallis referred to as cold, hard, mother ****ing facts of life.

0 Replies

gungasnake you're having a senior Event horizon moment!

0 Replies

gungasnake wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:
They exist if General Relativity is correct. .....

It isn't. These are simply the kinds of things which Marcelus Wallis referred to as cold, hard, mother ****ing facts of life.

Would you care to present some evidence that General Relativity is not correct?

0 Replies

gunga wrote:

These are simply the kinds of things which Marcelus Wallis referred to as cold, hard, mother ****ing facts of life.

This sums up the ID movement's basic stand on the origins of the universe and the origins of life.

This is a variation of the explanation for the color of the sky being blue, "cause God made it that way."

There is no need to expend anymore mental and intellectual effort on the subjects.

Let's go get drunk.

0 Replies

I thought he said black ho's.......

0 Replies

farmerman wrote:

THE CREATION EXPLAINED SOME BRIT

Ha! Not just some Brit. I've never seen Ricky Gervais so funny!

0 Replies

If there is no such thing as black holes then how can we have pictures like this of black holes eating white arrows?

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0402/bhstar_chandra_big.jpg

0 Replies

No black holes? What color are they then?

0 Replies

Whatever you do, Gunga, don't google for a quasar called OJ287.

Otherwise you'll have to explain just what that object 100 million times more massive than our sun is... and what the hell could it be orbiting that's 3.5 billion times more massive than our sun? Shocked

I'd say those objects are a little on the large side to be a planet and moon.

0 Replies

I did notice one mistake in the presentation...

Electromagnetic forces are said to be 10 - 39 times more powerful than gravity; what the author clearly meant to say was 10 - 39 orders of magnitude more powerful.

0 Replies

gungasnake wrote:

I did notice one mistake in the presentation...

Electromagnetic forces are said to be 10 - 39 times more powerful than gravity; what the author clearly meant to say was 10 - 39 orders of magnitude more powerful.

What does the author mean by "more powerful than"? How is he comparing the two forces in relation to "power"?

Electromagnetic forces can be dominant at atomic levels but irrelevant at galactic distances, while gravity has infinite range.

I noticed one mistake in the presentation as well... it was presented as fact rather than fiction.

0 Replies

We have a black hole right here in Michigan. It's called Detroit.

0 Replies

The truth about black holes

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know