Re: "The disease called man"--Nietzsche
coberst wrote:Since these psychic phenomena are unconscious we must[/u] accept that we have motivation to action with a purpose for which we are unconscious (involuntary purposes).
The word "must" unfortunately, if aptly, reveals the theory of repression for what it is: something that operates as a premise rather than a conclusion and, as such, serves as a rationalization rather than an explanation of human behavior. Like most psychoanalysis, the theory of repression contains built-in mechanisms that allow it to absorb contradictions. Even If I deny that I am repressing an emotion, the theory of repression helps Freud to say that say that this denial is itself proof that I am repressing an emotion. It goes without saying that a theory which can tout contradictions as proof is no explanation at all. This is why psychoanalysis can only be applied retroactively to things that have already happened rather than offer predictions about things that will happen. Unless it can do the latter, it can't be tested; and if it can't be tested, then it is devoid of explanatory power. In a statement like
Quote:Freud's hypothesis of the repressed unconscious results from the conclusion that it is common to all humans.
the very universality of the hypothesis undermines its usefulness. One can't help but question an explanation of human behavior that is applicable to
all individuals, which is to say applicable
regardless of the individual, which is to say applicable
without regard for the individual. At that point, it ceases to be an explanation of an individual's behavior and instead becomes a rationalization of it.
Thus, Coberst, everywhere where you've used the word "discovered" (as in "Freud
discovered the importance of repression when he
discovered the meaning of the "mad" symptoms of the mentally deranged"), I would use the word "invented."