0
   

Sex with a partner is 400% better..

 
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 01:35 am
partner?
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 01:50 am
Should I say partneresse? Very Happy

(French female form of partner)..
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 06:51 am
vid-

This is what you wrote on page 3

Quote:
Well, if the blessed Mr Larkin, a famous English poet, likens the act of making love with a partner as something akin to "squealching", then I would say that he was either no good in bed and therefore failed to achieve a heightened state of orgasm, he was unlucky and just happened to pick the type of English ladies who chose to lay there like a sack of potatoes, he was unattractive to women in either looks or manner and was therefore sadly deprived of ever having a good relationship, he didn't find women attractive, preferring to either aim his attentions to any other blessed poets who were in the vicinity or stare resentfully from his closet, or he was just plain lazy and preferred to be a wanker in order to avoid any unnecessary physical exertion.


So- to get it clear I informed you that-

I hadn't said that Mr Larkin likened the act to "squelching". I had said that Mr Waugh did that in his Daily Telegraph column and he repeated it a few times in his Spectator column. And he was quoting a third party.

You then concluded from that error some alternatives, all of which you made up, regarding Mr Larkin's state of mind or being. Out of those I said that the last was the most likely. I did not say it was the explanation. I said it was the most likely of your explanations all of which derived from an error you made.

I do not know what "good in bed" means nor do I understand how whatever it does mean is related to a "heightened state of orgasm". Your problem seems to stem from the idea that sex=male orgasm combined with the idea that sex with a heterosexual partner in the presence of artificial methods of birth control is the same as sex in the absence of conveniences (a word I use advisedly) provided by modern industrial businesses. Both those ideas are not exactly what real sex is all about. In fact, theologically, and taken together, they constitute masturbation of the dominant male but with the added frisson of using another person's body which provides a power kick.

This is a very complex subject vid and your proven inability to even read my posts properly demonstrates that you simply have not done the necessary reading to properly engage with it and have resolved to set up some not so subtle hints regarding how wonderful your own sex life is and how those not agreeing with you have problems all of which you are defining and describing and doing so without the slightest knowledge of anything outside your own head which has self evidently been filled up with cliches learned from various sources probably associated with sex-aid sales talk.

All of which is self reassuring just like saying that I got "uppity" is. Which is also incorrect.

Quote:
OK? I never said that you were the one who wrote that Larkin preferred to be a wanker. I said it and you seemed to agree.


What I "seemed" to do is again a matter for you. That is also incorrect and a result of not reading properly.

Quote:
Yet you seemed to offer it as a view that should be considered, or even supported. You certainly didn't make your views known that you disagreed with this view. If you disagreed with it, why offer it at all in your post? Either you were just showing off about how bookish you were, or you admired the guy for saying it. Don't go backtracking now, spendius, as it won't help your credibility regarding this matter. Like I said before, if you attempt to blow smoke up people's asses by using these obtuse references and quotes, you can end up causing major confusion over what you actually mean. Or was/is that your intention all along? Use plain english in future, spendius, that's what I would recommend.


Regarding "squelching", I think the term quite appropriate. Had you the opportunity to read the ZIT or VIZ adult comics which are popular here you would realise that "squelching" is quite a genteel word to use in this context.

Once again it is your idea that I am "back-tracking" and, having made such an incorrect assumption, it is your idea that it has anything to do with my credibility. It is also your idea that I don't use plain English and I certainly don't recommend that any viewers take up your methods of using the language.

Quote:
There ya go again. Don't try and sidetrack this with Ulysses, which would no doubt lead on to another one of the classics and then god knows where, as it will only derail from the subject and give you another opportunity to show us how clever you are.


A brief reference to the Ulysses/Sirens story, which every educated person is familiar with, hardly constitutes "sidetracking". It goes to the very core of the matter under discussion. The very fact that it does is why it is such a famous story. When Ulysses evaded the Sirens by having himself tied to the mast and his crew's ears stopped with wax he was taking great pains to avoid the very satisfactions under discussion here and he hadn't seen a woman, let alone a Siren, in a long while. And the Sirens were reputed to offer 10,000% satisfactions.

Quote:
You know what you were trying to do. Don't go all chicken on it now, just because someone is challenging you.


Now I'm going "all chicken". Wow! You really don't belong on a science forum vid. You're just spouting self serving nonsense which you make up as you go along. I could have you running up the road if I was to run the gauntlet of the mods on this subject. You just want, like all the popular women's magazines, to monopolise the market in male sexual relief so that you can up the price as all monopoly suppliers do. It is quite understandable of course from your point of view.

Quote:
Truth hurts sometimes, eh?


Sheesh!

I am interested in the link you provided as it is now part of the thread and I am set to wondering if the mods are happy with the pushing back of the boundaries which it entails. I never thought a word like "taco" would be allowed on A2K.
0 Replies
 
vid
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 04:21 pm
Jeez, if there ever was a man who needed to clear his tubes....

Spendius, if I were not such a martyr to my lower back I'd seek you out, hold you down and straddle you with such ferocity and regularity that in no time at all, you'd be down in the kitchen happily whistling dixie each morning while you prepared my pancakes and coffee.

Now, I'm going to get ready to go out for the evening to see the New Year in with some happy, smiling faces.

Happy New Year, Spendius. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 06:35 pm
Would you actually do that vid? What you said!

Nah-- you would soon get fed up with that and have me clipping the lawn edges with nail scissors and holding the car door open for you.
0 Replies
 
vid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2008 12:00 pm
Probably true, Spendius. A man who opens doors is a catch, as it shows he's a gentleman underneath all that smoke ingrained tweed and grumpiness, but a man who clips a lawn with nail scissors would probably expect the same level of perfection from me and that would prove tiresome in the long run.
Still, sitting by your fire in jolly ol' England, with you reading verse from blessed poets while I knit you some new riding underwear does have some sort of perverse attraction.

Maybe it's the challenge of it all. All polished up and with a smile in your heart, I reckon the new you would surprise even yourself. :wink:

2008 already. Where does the time go? Nowadays, sometimes, I must admit to looking at young people and going all high windows on myself.


New years day seems to get me this way, just lately. I hope you had a good one.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2008 12:09 pm
Aren't they nice, all this politeness and good will!!

What a wonderful couple!

But will it pass the test of the pheromones?

At what level on the scale will they perform, 150%?
0 Replies
 
vid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2008 12:12 pm
Very Happy

You worry about your own prolactin, Francis. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2008 12:58 pm
That's the least of my worries... Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2008 02:35 pm
Francis wrote-

Quote:
But will it pass the test of the pheromones?


That sort of stuff is for animals and young lads who have yet to tangle with the real thing which, as Wanda said, doesn't know about until it is shown to her but after that fasten your seatbelts.

As soon as the thread title starts talking abouy MY satisfactions you are in MCP-land for sure. Like when a coin comes down heads rather than tailes.
Bold as brass.

Any level of performance is not measured in percentages anyway. It is measured in parsecs of the infinite variety. And not by our side either.

Ovidia wrote-

Quote:
.Probably true, Spendius. A man who opens doors is a catch, as it shows he's a gentleman underneath all that smoke ingrained tweed and grumpiness, but a man who clips a lawn with nail scissors would probably expect the same level of perfection from me and that would prove tiresome in the long run.


Now there you go. You only escape censure on that point by your foresight to include the word "probably". It suggests though that you have probably not met a real gentleman yet. His lot is but to do and die and not to reason why. He's doomed.

All the best literature teaches that. The other stuff is a component of the smoke and mirrors along with the husky voice and the big, round-eyed ,innocent, friendly and unblinking stare which Bill Greenwell claimed led to-

Quote:
the last, rasping gasp of the mantis's groom.


I love getting that line onto A2K. This is No 3 I think. I could tell a good story about that poem. It involves Mr Auberon Waugh, of blessed memory, chairing a poetry judging committee composed of intellectual ladies of a certain age. It was quite a battle I gather.

Quote:
Still, sitting by your fire in jolly ol' England, with you reading verse from blessed poets while I knit you some new riding underwear does have some sort of perverse attraction.


You don't seriously think I bother with fires. Gadgets control my room temperatures. I did actually read some Goethe though-

Quote:
'Tis from thy face the angels gain
their strength, but scan it no one may
Beyond all thought thy Works remain
sublime as on Creation-Day.


It is "The Sun" being addressed. It's from the prologue of Faust from which our Culture has its proper name.

I suppose wool riding underwear is a bit kinky. I daresay you might be ready for getting it off after a long ride.

Quote:
Maybe it's the challenge of it all. All polished up and with a smile in your heart, I reckon the new you would surprise even yourself.


"Polished" is not a word which sits well in Faustian art.

The gleaming surface takes away "the life and body of the substantial being", they say. It is a finished object. Static. Ancient Greek. Become. Over with, History. Dead.

Faustian art is "aery", dissolving surfaces and shades and whatnot. It's in motion. Has potential. The soul unconfined.

If I were polished I might look metallic with a diffused refulgence generated by my glowing exterior and my pure, clearly outlined surfaces from which the light would always refelect in the same way. I would be dematerialized as the eye slithered along contemplating me.

A bit like a baked-bean can with the wrapper off.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2008 03:01 pm
spendius wrote:
It is measured in parsecs of the infinite variety.


And only angstroms away from "density"?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2008 03:30 pm
A bit like when-

Quote:
The eyes of the idol in the iron head are glowing


eh?
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2008 03:51 pm
But with the truth so far off, what good will it do?
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jan, 2008 05:33 pm
somjeone said something about casual sex, thats all i ever get , i mean **** i have always had a feeling i was missing something but you know, im pretty sure this hit the nail...
0 Replies
 
blindsided
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jan, 2008 10:35 pm
.
Is it weird that I can have sex, bust a nut, and keep having sex? I might bust, keep going until I bust another, then bust another maybe. After that I don't bust any more nuts, but keep a hard-on(and can go until I get bored or thirsty). I think I should be a porn star.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/20/2022 at 03:00:27