Reply
Fri 14 Dec, 2007 11:07 pm
I want to know if anybody feels the way I do and please give me your ideas about regulated hunting. I'm not hunter, but I feel regulated hunting is the best way to save wildlife. It is trure the hunters kill wildlife, but they also help in population control. Most hunters give to nonprofit organizations to help wildlife and their habitats. Even the ones who don't donate still help: most of the hunting gear, stamps, guns, ammo; alot of the profit made is given back to the wildlife fund, not to mention liscensces and permits. Hunters know the characteristics of animals and how to camp outdoors without a lot of comforts. Hunters really care about the destruction of wildlife, because that destroys their passion.
privatly owned hunting reserves.
Regulated numbers and locations for hunters. Bred for purpose quarry.
Want to hunt? Pay the price. No more out of control and drunk rednecks no more shooting up road signs or inappropriate out of season game.
I think regulated hunting is a good thing. If we are random, we get into over-kill and roll toward diminishing species. I think we need hunting to manage over-population, but sure hope the hunters are using all of what they kill and are not just after trophies.