1
   

Regulated hunting is it the best answer for conserving wildl

 
 
Reply Fri 14 Dec, 2007 11:07 pm
I want to know if anybody feels the way I do and please give me your ideas about regulated hunting. I'm not hunter, but I feel regulated hunting is the best way to save wildlife. It is trure the hunters kill wildlife, but they also help in population control. Most hunters give to nonprofit organizations to help wildlife and their habitats. Even the ones who don't donate still help: most of the hunting gear, stamps, guns, ammo; alot of the profit made is given back to the wildlife fund, not to mention liscensces and permits. Hunters know the characteristics of animals and how to camp outdoors without a lot of comforts. Hunters really care about the destruction of wildlife, because that destroys their passion.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 557 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Dec, 2007 11:25 pm
privatly owned hunting reserves.

Regulated numbers and locations for hunters. Bred for purpose quarry.

Want to hunt? Pay the price. No more out of control and drunk rednecks no more shooting up road signs or inappropriate out of season game.
0 Replies
 
doc sue
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Dec, 2007 11:58 am
I think regulated hunting is a good thing. If we are random, we get into over-kill and roll toward diminishing species. I think we need hunting to manage over-population, but sure hope the hunters are using all of what they kill and are not just after trophies.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Regulated hunting is it the best answer for conserving wildl
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/23/2025 at 10:01:48