0
   

Cosmic Electrical Physics, Catastrophist Cosmology

 
 
Reply Fri 23 Nov, 2007 05:37 am
David Talbott and Wallace Thornhill on the electrical nature of the universe and the history of our solar system, this one is as good as it gets. In eight parts:


http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=1L9kQjKSPhE

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Om_qGORGW8Q&feature=related

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7SyuaHur5M&feature=related

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=--2qS4LwqVs&feature=related

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=-lMJs2W6IJc&feature=related

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=xYe9ZVcP5kg&feature=related

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=q06H8UwcVFQ&feature=related

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=CnUe_0QQxHM&feature=related
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 800 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Nov, 2007 06:59 am
Loonies. David Talbott's and Wallace Thornhill peddle crazy theories about thunderbolts for gullible fools.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Nov, 2007 07:42 am
contrex wrote:
Loonies. David Talbott's and Wallace Thornhill peddle crazy theories about thunderbolts for gullible fools.


Does being an idiot hurt much?
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Nov, 2007 03:14 pm
gungasnake wrote:
contrex wrote:
Loonies. David Talbott's and Wallace Thornhill peddle crazy theories about thunderbolts for gullible fools.


Does being an idiot hurt much?


You ought to know. Talbott is a nut who believes all that Velikovsky "chariots of the gods" stuff which sold so many books to fools in the 1970s. Pyramids and flying saucer stuff.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Nov, 2007 04:27 pm
In other words, it doesn't hurt YOU any...
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Nov, 2007 05:24 pm
gungasnake wrote:
In other words, it doesn't hurt YOU any...


What's that got to with anything?
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 06:48 am
Re: Cosmic Electrical Physics, Catastrophist Cosmology
gungasnake wrote:
David Talbott and Wallace Thornhill on the electrical nature of the universe and the history of our solar system, this one is as good as it gets. In eight parts:

Why do you like this type of stuff so much Gunga? It's not supported by any reasonable evidence and the presenters are generally viewed as crackpots.

Do you just like it because it's not "mainstream"? Or do you just like crackpots?
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 06:57 am
Re: Cosmic Electrical Physics, Catastrophist Cosmology
rosborne979 wrote:
gungasnake wrote:
David Talbott and Wallace Thornhill on the electrical nature of the universe and the history of our solar system, this one is as good as it gets. In eight parts:

Why do you like this type of stuff so much Gunga? It's not supported by any reasonable evidence.....


If you work hard enough at it it actually is possible to know what the **** you're talking about. But it clearly takes more time and effort than you've ever devoted to it.

The little video I mentioned has become one of youtube's hottest items over the last week or so.

In Canada, Thunderbolts was the third most frequently viewed Google video tuesday. Wordwide, the video was in the top 40 for the second time in a week. Presently it's at number 28.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 07:20 am
Re: Cosmic Electrical Physics, Catastrophist Cosmology
gungasnake wrote:
The little video I mentioned has become one of youtube's hottest items over the last week or so.

Yeh, that's because people are laughing at it. It's great comedy.

But unlike everyone else, you're not laughing, so why do you like this stuff?
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 07:32 am
Re: Cosmic Electrical Physics, Catastrophist Cosmology
gungasnake wrote:
The little video I mentioned has become one of youtube's hottest items over the last week or so.

In Canada, Thunderbolts was the third most frequently viewed Google video tuesday. Wordwide, the video was in the top 40 for the second time in a week. Presently it's at number 28.


(Rolls eyes)

That doesn't prove it's right, just that there are a lot of gullible people around. There's one born every minute, as my Dad used to say.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 08:14 am
The EU theory DOES explain the filamentary structure of the universe we observe and it eliminates the idiotic medievalisms which you otherwise read about including "dark matter(TM)", "Dark energy(TM)", "black holes(TM)", the "Big Bang(TM)" etc. etc. etc.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 08:25 am
gungasnake wrote:
The EU theory DOES explain the filamentary structure of the universe we observe and it eliminates the idiotic medievalisms which you otherwise read about including "dark matter(TM)", "Dark energy(TM)", "black holes(TM)", the "Big Bang(TM)" etc. etc. etc.

So that's your only reason for liking it, because it explains the filament structure? (even though other theories also explain the filament structure).

It almost sounds like you hate the BB more than you like the EU theory. Is the EU theory just your default position because it's something besides the BB?
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 09:47 am
Being a naturally lazy person, I welcome this new easy method of demolishing theories by typing "(TM)" after their names. So let's say goodbye to Intelligent Design(TM), Eminent Domain (TM) & The Monroe Doctrine (TM) for a start.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 09:58 am
http://cosmologystatement.org/

Signers include some of the people who run Las Alamos.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 10:06 am
contrex wrote:
Being a naturally lazy person, I welcome this new easy method of demolishing theories by typing "(TM)" after their names. So let's say goodbye to Intelligent Design(TM), Eminent Domain (TM) & The Monroe Doctrine (TM) for a start.


Being a naturally lazy person, you should be happy that "dark matter" turns out to be a bunch of bullshit. If it were real and if it were actually 95% of the universe as claimed, you'd be having to vacuum it up off your carpets five times a day.

For that matter, and I've mentioned this before...

There are roughly as many inches in a mile as there are AUs in a light year. If you let that be your scale, i.e. if you let an inch represent an astronomical unit, then our solar system is about a yard or so across, the sun is about the diameter of a human hair, the Earth an inch from that hair-diameter sun, and the nearest other star is four ****ing miles and change distant. Moreover, even in the brightest star clusters we observe, the distances between stars are not much different from that.

Now, it should be obvious to anybody with any more than the intellect God gave dogs and cats that gravity cannot hold two dust motes together from four ****ing miles away. And what the idiots who talk about "dark matter(TM)" being 95% of the universe are trying to claim is this:

Quote:

Granted gravity cannot hold two dust motes together from four miles distance; however if we put a dust mote every FIFTH of a mile (a fifth of a mile is two of those little markers you might have noticed along highways), then it all works, no problem!!!!

DOOOOOooooooooo-Whuuuupppppppp!!!!!!!!!



I like the EU theory better than I like that sort of BS.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Cosmic Electrical Physics, Catastrophist Cosmology
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/07/2024 at 10:46:42