1
   

What're the best fiction books w philsophical underpinnings?

 
 
Centroles
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Nov, 2007 09:17 pm
Chumly wrote:
Centroles wrote:
This is also why I LOVE SHORT STORIES with a philosophical message/theme.
I agree 100%, short stories and novellas "don't get no respect" as Rodney would say! I feel they may be the perfect platform for conveying ideas without bogging down.
Quote:


The perfect format to convey a single philosophy or idea.

Long novels on the other hand are the perfect platform for conveying a whole bunch of philosophies ideas and perspectives, Watchmen beign the perfect example of a book that does just that.

Any Rand and some of the older books that people here are recommending unfortunately devote the entire lenght to just one idea, theme or concept (in my opinion of course).

I grew up in the generation that gets dozens of different ideas and perspectives bombed at us at the same time from our youth, our generation can handle having a several different philiosophies and perspectives vying for our attention in the same book. I find it much more entertaining.

Some people like to see things in black and white, and dislike having two contradictory viewpoints and ideas presented at the same time (they tend to be DC fans who like the ideals that Superman and Batman achieve and represent). Others feels the opposite way (and happen to prefer Marvels flawed heros that are sometimes wrong approach).
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Nov, 2007 10:13 pm
Centroles wrote:
Chumly wrote:
Centroles wrote:
This is also why I LOVE SHORT STORIES with a philosophical message/theme.
I agree 100%, short stories and novellas "don't get no respect" as Rodney would say! I feel they may be the perfect platform for conveying ideas without bogging down.
Quote:


The perfect format to convey a single philosophy or idea.

Long novels on the other hand are the perfect platform for conveying a whole bunch of philosophies ideas and perspectives, Watchmen beign the perfect example of a book that does just that.

Any Rand and some of the older books that people here are recommending unfortunately devote the entire lenght to just one idea, theme or concept (in my opinion of course).

I grew up in the generation that gets dozens of different ideas and perspectives bombed at us at the same time from our youth, our generation can handle having a several different philiosophies and perspectives vying for our attention in the same book. I find it much more entertaining.

Some people like to see things in black and white, and dislike having two contradictory viewpoints and ideas presented at the same time (they tend to be DC fans who like the ideals that Superman and Batman achieve and represent). Others feels the opposite way (and happen to prefer Marvels flawed heros that are sometimes wrong approach).


You appear to be a member of the Short Attention Span Generation. Watchman is a graphic novel, not to be maligned as such, but it certainly falls in line with a generation that, tragically, simply does not not like to read.

Or perhaps not - Marvel and DC comic book heros are identical in their flawed ambiguity and have been that way for quite some time (20 years)

Out of curiosity, what do you perceive to be the singular philosophical concept that Ayn Rand pumps into the hundreds of pages of her novels?

Unfortunately Rand's novels are almost cliches for philosophically underscored books, but, in any case, her novels are hardly the quintessential representatives of pre-80's literature.

If you want variety, read Voyage to Arcturus (published in 1920). If you want brevity, read Metamorphosis (published in 1915).

Before you lay claim to generational superiority, explore those that went before you.

The Republic (350 BC)
Macbeth (1603)
Metamorphosis (1915)
Voyage to Arcturus (1920)
Brave New World (1939)
1984 (1949)
On The Road (1951)
Naked Lunch (1959)
Acts of Worship (1965)
The Magus (1968)
Shikasta (1979)
The Unbearable Lightness of Being (1984)
The Children of Men (1992)

Etc Etc Etc
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Nov, 2007 10:58 pm
All else aside, I will argue that both the short story and the novella have at times been unfairly "discriminated" against in favor of the full length novel by readers and critics alike.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Nov, 2007 11:02 pm
Chumly wrote:
All else aside, I will argue that both the short story and the novella have at times been unfairly "discriminated" against in favor of the full length novel by readers and critics alike.


Critics perhaps, but who cares?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Nov, 2007 11:15 pm
When it comes to the short story's commercial success/failure as found in compilations, a short story's lifespan may rely to some large measure, on the critic-editor.

Ben Bova, John W. Campbell, Jr., Terry Carr, Damon Knight........

Also, the short story and novella simply have not garnered the level of reader popularity they deserve, and to me that is indeed a true shame.

The short story and the novella are beautiful forms that demand a certain economy and focus not easily achieved.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Nov, 2007 11:32 pm
Chumly wrote:
When it comes to the short story's commercial success/failure as found in compilations, a short story's lifespan may rely to some large measure, on the critic-editor.

Ben Bova, John W. Campbell, Jr., Terry Carr, Damon Knight........

Also the short story and novella simply has not garnered the level of reader popularity they deserve, and to me that is indeed a true shame.

The short story and the novella are beautiful forms that demand a certain economy and focus not easily achieved.


So these literary forms have not received the same commercial success as the novel.

How about poetry? It's far worse off than novellas and short stories.

I'm all for great writers making tons of money for their produce, but if they don't, should they not write?

Actually, any commercially succesful writer will have no problem publishing his or her short stories or poems, and they will make money on them.

The more obscure authors/poets can still see their works published. Will they get rich as a result? Nope, but is that why they took pen to paper?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Nov, 2007 12:00 am
I'm not the greatest fan of some poetry, at least the reading of it, although I have had fun writing it.

I can understand its low popularity being a function of its inherent inaccessibility, however the same cannot be said of the short story or novella. If anything it can be argued the short story or novella have the inherent potential for a higher level of immediacy and accessibility than the full length novel.

It's my contention that the short story / novella's poorer reception overall has more to do with the better economic incentives of the full-length novel to both publisher and writer alike, and to the standardization of literary conventions, than to any other single argument.

As to you claim that commercially successful writers can write in the form of their choosing, and still be successful, you might note the somewhat circular nature of your claim, given most of them wrote full length novels to become successful in the first place, and most of them still write full length novels as a measure of their continued popularity.

I see little long term conclusive evidence to support your claim that "any commercially successful writer will have no problem publishing his or her short stories or poems, and they will make money on them" and thus one would assume maintain their continued level of commercial success with the less popular literary forms. Iffy stuff there Finneus J. Whoopie.

Most importantly however, I'll bet Centroles and others are hankering for another short story from the Golden Age of Science Fiction, and who am I to deny 'em?

I'll see what I can scrounge up from dusty bits and bytes, displaced by time and tears.............
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Nov, 2007 12:27 am
Click on the rocket and enjoy this 1956 radio play! http://ottolejeune.com/index.php/downloads/032_the_roads_must_roll/



For me Robert A. Heinlein was a consumate master with a very intriguing bio! For those perhaps seeking some depth in the original story:
Quote:
"The Roads Must Roll" is a 1940 science fiction short story by Robert A. Heinlein about wide, rapidly moving passenger platforms (like moving sidewalks, but much faster- topping out at 100mph). These roads combine the features of highways, railways and highway towns, and all goes smoothly until there is union trouble. The men who maintain the roads get around beneath them via "tumblebugs": unicycles which are motorized and gyroscopically stabilized much like the real-life Segway.

Heinlein's themes are technological change and social cohesion. The (fictional) social movement he calls functionalism (which is unrelated to the real-life sociological theory of the same name) believes that one's status and level of material reward in a society must and should depend on the functions one performs for that society.


In "The Roads Must Roll", the technicians who maintain the San Diego to Reno roadway are duped into believing that their role in maintaining the nation's transport infrastructure is more important than that of any other workers and that they should therefore be rewarded more highly than any others. To demonstrate their importance and press their claims, they stop the central 100 mph strip, causing transportation chaos and many casualties.

Larry Gaines, Chief Engineer of the roadtown, is instrumental in restoring order and bringing the villains to justice, through a combination of clear thinking, swift para-military action at the head of his uniformed cadets, and appeals to patriotism.

The story is interesting in a broader political sense, and in the context of the rest of Heinlein's writing, because it provides the relatively rare example of a libertarian author arguing against worker's unions -- here justified because the worker's union in question is in a government-run public service industry on which the broader society as a whole is dependent. The story thus retains a great deal of modern relevance, especially with regard to strikes by civic transportation and sanitation workers and the like.

The story uses the technique of the false protagonist. At first the reader is introduced to the firebrand who stirs up the workers to their radical action, and at this stage the reader can quite easily identify with him and the grievances he addresses. When Larry Gaines first appears, it seems to be just a glimpse at what the Bad Guys are doing. However, the "glimpse" goes on and on while the strikers blacken themselves in reader's eyes by callously causing the death and wounding of innocent passengers - and Gaines correspondingly wins the reader's sympathy and identification. The demagogue who seemed the hero at first is only met again at the very end, when he is already clearly identified as the arch-villain who gets his just punishment.


http://ottolejeune.com/index.php/downloads/032_the_roads_must_roll/
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 09:40 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
Most of my favorites are not new. Opus 21, by Philip Wylie, is one of my tops. We spend a weekend with the semifictional Wylie, who is an ex alcoholic, still a smoker, and awaiting a biopsy on a growth found in his throat. He has to finish editing down a magazine article or story by Monday. He encounters a scientist nephew, who fell in love with a loose girl, lost her, and now contemplates suicide; an old friend madam at a whorehouse; a minister, whom Wylie unsettles rather easily; a boorish man in a restaurant, and several other characters, all of whom conveniently fit into his philisophical, Jungian, atheistic musings. For about twenty years, I latched onto the author as an unwitting father figure for myself. I look back with great fondness, and occasionally reread some of his stuff.


yeap, I also like Wylie's "the Disapperance" and "Generation of Vipers"

but for Chumly who has rightfully elvated the works of futurist writers of the "Goldern Age" of science fiction, I have another but a decade earlier work by Olaf Stapledon.,"Star Maker."

Quote:
Widely regarded as one of the true classics of science fiction, Star Maker is a poetic and deeply philosophical work. The story details the mental journey of an unnamed narrator who is transported not only to other worlds but also other galaxies and parallel universes, until he eventually becomes part of the "cosmic mind." First published in 1937, Olaf Stapledon's descriptions of alien life are a political commentary on human life in the turbulent inter-war years. The book challenges preconceived notions of intelligence and awareness, and ultimately argues for a broadened perspective that would free us from culturally ingrained thought and our inevitable anthropomorphism. This is the first scholarly edition of a book that influenced such writers as C.S. Lewis and Arthur C. Clarke and which Jorge Luis Borges called "a prodigious novel."


Stapledon sorbed the theories Spengler proposed about culture from "The Decline of the West," and fit them into a comsic theme.

There is no more monumental book in the field of science fiction. From its pages mere throw-away passages have inspired legions of ideas for subsequent authors of the genre.

and it is as philosophical as the Upanishads.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 08:27 pm
kuvasz wrote:
There is no more monumental book in the field of science fiction.
That's quite the heartfelt accolade, sadly I don't think I've read any of his stuff.

For fans of Robert Bloch here is another radio-play from the Golden Age
Quote:
A newly-made android is capable of learning anything. He wants to learn about love but its training is taken over by a criminal who teaches him the wrong things. Very thoughtful, intelligent story by Robert Bloch. August 11, 1955


Click on the rocket! http://ottolejeune.com/index.php/downloads/comments/013_almost_human/
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 11:13 pm
Chumly wrote:
kuvasz wrote:
There is no more monumental book in the field of science fiction.
That's quite the heartfelt accolade, sadly I don't think I've read any of his stuff.

Then I envy you because the feeling you will get during your first reading is akin to the sensation a child has upon his first encounter with chocolate.

I stumbled on to Olaf Stapledon because his work was alongside Ted Sturgeon's books on the SF section of shelves in my college library. Sturgeon is my favorite science fiction writer and his "Microcosmic God" is considered the best short story in the genre.


Have a go-see about SM and its prequil "Last and First Men" which itself measures the journey of mankind through 3 plus billion years of evolution.

For fans of Robert Bloch here is another radio-play from the Golden Age
Quote:
A newly-made android is capable of learning anything. He wants to learn about love but its training is taken over by a criminal who teaches him the wrong things. Very thoughtful, intelligent story by Robert Bloch. August 11, 1955


Click on the rocket! http://ottolejeune.com/index.php/downloads/comments/013_almost_human/

BTW ALL science fiction fan needs to know about this site. It has for free download all 126 episodes of X MINUS ONE, with radio stories written by the likes of Sturgeon, Heinlein, Bliss, Bradbury and others. I have them loaded to my ipod for listening during long drives.

http://ottolejeune.com/index.php/downloads
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Dec, 2007 11:46 pm
Theodore Sturgeon was undoubtedly a master! I can understand why he would be your fave SF writer.

"Some day the Neoterics, after innumerable generations of inconceivable advancement, will take down their shield and come forth. When I think of that I feel frightened." - "Microcosmic God", 1941, Theodore Sturgeon

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -"Profiles of The Future", 1961, Arthur C. Clarke
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 10:54:38